Literature DB >> 23474090

Characterizing changes in the excitability of corticospinal projections to proximal muscles of the upper limb.

Richard G Carson1, Barry D Nelson, Alison R Buick, Timothy J Carroll, Niamh C Kennedy, Rachel Mac Cann.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There has been an explosion of interest in methods of exogenous brain stimulation that induce changes in the excitability of human cerebral cortex. The expectation is that these methods may promote recovery of function following brain injury. To assess their effects on motor output, it is typical to assess the state of corticospinal projections from primary motor cortex to muscles of the hand, via electromyographic responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation. If a range of stimulation intensities is employed, the recruitment curves (RCs) obtained can, at least for intrinsic hand muscles, be fitted by a sigmoid function. OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: To establish whether sigmoid fits provide a reliable basis upon which to characterize the input-output properties of the corticospinal pathway for muscles proximal to the hand, and to assess as an alternative the area under the (recruitment) curve (AURC).
METHODS: A comparison of the reliability of these measures, using RCs obtained for muscles that are frequently the targets of rehabilitation.
RESULTS: The AURC is an extremely reliable measure of the state of corticospinal projections to hand and forearm muscles, which has both face and concurrent validity. Construct validity is demonstrated by detection of widely distributed (across muscles) changes in corticospinal excitability induced by paired associative stimulation (PAS). CONCLUSION(S): The parameters derived from sigmoid fits are unlikely to provide an adequate means to assess the effectiveness of therapeutic regimes. The AURC can be employed to characterize corticospinal projections to a range of muscles, and gauge the efficacy of longitudinal interventions in clinical rehabilitation.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Afferent stimulation; Arm; Goodness of fit; Motor evoked potentials; Plasticity

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23474090     DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2013.01.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Stimul        ISSN: 1876-4754            Impact factor:   8.955


  33 in total

1.  Paired associative transcranial alternating current stimulation increases the excitability of corticospinal projections in humans.

Authors:  Emmet McNickle; Richard G Carson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Cross-education of muscular strength is facilitated by homeostatic plasticity.

Authors:  Ashlyn K Frazer; Jacqueline Williams; Michael Spittle; Dawson J Kidgell
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Reliability of TMS metrics in patients with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury.

Authors:  K A Potter-Baker; D P Janini; F S Frost; P Chabra; N Varnerin; D A Cunningham; V Sankarasubramanian; E B Plow
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 2.772

4.  The corticospinal responses of metronome-paced, but not self-paced strength training are similar to motor skill training.

Authors:  Michael Leung; Timo Rantalainen; Wei-Peng Teo; Dawson Kidgell
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Deleterious effects of a low amount of ethanol on LTP-like plasticity in human cortex.

Authors:  Caroline Lücke; Tonio Heidegger; Mirjam Röhner; Stefan W Toennes; Lucia Krivanekova; Florian Müller-Dahlhaus; Ulf Ziemann
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 7.853

6.  Improvements in hand function in adults with chronic tetraplegia following a multiday 10-Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation intervention combined with repetitive task practice.

Authors:  Joyce Gomes-Osman; Edelle C Field-Fote
Journal:  J Neurol Phys Ther       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.649

7.  Bilateral Contralaterally Controlled Functional Electrical Stimulation Reveals New Insights Into the Interhemispheric Competition Model in Chronic Stroke.

Authors:  David A Cunningham; Jayme S Knutson; Vishwanath Sankarasubramanian; Kelsey A Potter-Baker; Andre G Machado; Ela B Plow
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 3.919

8.  Adaptations in corticospinal excitability and inhibition are not spatially confined to the agonist muscle following strength training.

Authors:  Joel Mason; Ashlyn Frazer; Deanna M Horvath; Alan J Pearce; Janne Avela; Glyn Howatson; Dawson Kidgell
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 3.078

9.  Functional Resistance Training to Improve Knee Strength and Function After Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Case Study.

Authors:  Scott R Brown; Edward P Washabaugh; Aviroop Dutt-Mazumder; Edward M Wojtys; Riann M Palmieri-Smith; Chandramouli Krishnan
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 3.843

10.  Increased short interval intracortical inhibition in participants with previous hamstring strain injury.

Authors:  R Buhmann; G S Trajano; G K Kerr; A J Shield
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 3.078

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.