Literature DB >> 34729636

Increased short interval intracortical inhibition in participants with previous hamstring strain injury.

R Buhmann1, G S Trajano2, G K Kerr2, A J Shield2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Cortical mechanisms may contribute to weakness in participants with previous hamstring strain injury. This study aims to examine intra-cortical inhibition (SICI) and corticospinal excitability in previously injured participants.
METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, TMS was used to examine SICI, silent period, silent period: MEP ratios and area under the stimulus response curve in the biceps femoris and medial hamstrings. Comparisons were made between participants with (n = 10) and without (n = 10) previous hamstring strain injury. Motor threshold and isometric knee flexor strength were also compared between participants and the relationship between strength and SICI in control and previously injured participants was examined.
RESULTS: Isometric knee flexor strength was lower in previously injured limbs compared with control limbs (mean difference = - 41 Nm (- 26%) [95% CI = - 80 to - 2 Nm], p = 0.04, Cohen's d = - 1.27) and contralateral uninjured limbs (mean difference = - 23 Nm (- 17%), [95% CI = - 40 to - 6 Nm], p = 0.01, Cohen's d = - 0.57). Previously injured limbs exhibited smaller responses to paired pulse stimulation (i.e. greater levels of SICI) in the biceps femoris compared with control limbs (mean difference = - 19%, [95% CI = - 34 to - 5%], p = 0.007, Cohen's d = - 1.33). Isometric knee flexor strength was associated with the level of SICI recorded in the biceps femoris in previously injured participants (coefficient = 23 Nm [95% CI = 7-40 Nm], adjusted R2 = 0.31, p = 0.01). There were no differences in markers of corticospinal excitability between previously injured and control limbs (all p > 0.24, all Cohen's d < 0.40).
CONCLUSION: Athletes with previous injury in the biceps femoris exhibit increased SICI in this muscle compared with control participants. Increased SICI is related to lower levels of hamstring strength, and rehabilitation programs targeting the removal of intra-cortical inhibition should be considered.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hamstring muscles; Muscle strength; Neural inhibition; Rehabilitation; Transcranial magnetic stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34729636     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-021-04839-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  40 in total

1.  Knee flexion not hip extension strength is persistently reduced following hamstring strain injury in Australian Football athletes: Implications for Periodic Health Examinations.

Authors:  Paula C Charlton; Benjamin Raysmith; Martin Wollin; Simon Rice; Craig Purdam; Ross A Clark; Michael K Drew
Journal:  J Sci Med Sport       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 4.319

2.  Intracortical inhibition and facilitation in different representations of the human motor cortex.

Authors:  R Chen; A Tam; C Bütefisch; B Corwell; U Ziemann; J C Rothwell; L G Cohen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Fast estimation of transcranial magnetic stimulation motor threshold: is it safe?

Authors:  Friedemann Awiszus
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 8.955

4.  Investigating the effects of muscle contraction and conditioning stimulus intensity on short-interval intracortical inhibition.

Authors:  Ashlee M Hendy; Maria M Ekblom; Christopher Latella; Wei-Peng Teo
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 3.386

5.  The effect of coil type and limb dominance in the assessment of lower-limb motor cortex excitability using TMS.

Authors:  Thanuja Dharmadasa; José M Matamala; James Howells; Neil G Simon; Steve Vucic; Matthew C Kiernan
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 3.046

6.  Characterizing changes in the excitability of corticospinal projections to proximal muscles of the upper limb.

Authors:  Richard G Carson; Barry D Nelson; Alison R Buick; Timothy J Carroll; Niamh C Kennedy; Rachel Mac Cann
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2013-02-24       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 7.  The role of neuromuscular inhibition in hamstring strain injury recurrence.

Authors:  Jackson J Fyfe; David A Opar; Morgan D Williams; Anthony J Shield
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2013-02-09       Impact factor: 2.368

8.  Voluntary Activation and Reflex Responses after Hamstring Strain Injury.

Authors:  Robert Buhmann; Gabriel S Trajano; Graham Kerr; Anthony Shield
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 5.411

9.  Motor cortex activation is related to force of squeezing.

Authors:  Steven C Cramer; Robert M Weisskoff; Judith D Schaechter; Gereon Nelles; Mary Foley; Seth P Finklestein; Bruce R Rosen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 10.  The number of stimuli required to reliably assess corticomotor excitability and primary motor cortical representations using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS): a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rocco Cavaleri; Siobhan M Schabrun; Lucy S Chipchase
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2017-03-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.