Literature DB >> 25504575

Paired associative transcranial alternating current stimulation increases the excitability of corticospinal projections in humans.

Emmet McNickle1, Richard G Carson.   

Abstract

Many types of non-invasive brain stimulation alter corticospinal excitability (CSE). Paired associative stimulation (PAS) has attracted particular attention as its effects ostensibly adhere to Hebbian principles of neural plasticity. In prototypical form, a single electrical stimulus is directed to a peripheral nerve in close temporal contiguity with transcranial magnetic stimulation delivered to the contralateral primary motor cortex (M1). Repeated pairing of the two discrete stimulus events (i.e. association) over an extended period either increases or decreases the excitability of corticospinal projections from M1, contingent on the interstimulus interval. We studied a novel form of associative stimulation, consisting of brief trains of peripheral afferent stimulation paired with short bursts of high frequency (≥80 Hz) transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) over contralateral M1. Elevations in the excitability of corticospinal projections to the forearm were observed for a range of tACS frequency (80, 140 and 250 Hz), current (1, 2 and 3 mA) and duration (500 and 1000 ms) parameters. The effects were at least as reliable as those brought about by PAS or transcranial direct current stimulation. When paired with tACS, muscle tendon vibration also induced elevations of CSE. No such changes were brought about by the tACS or peripheral afferent stimulation alone. In demonstrating that associative effects are expressed when the timing of the peripheral and cortical events is not precisely circumscribed, these findings suggest that multiple cellular pathways may contribute to a long term potentiation-type response. Their relative contributions will differ depending on the nature of the induction protocol that is used.
© 2014 The Authors. The Journal of Physiology © 2014 The Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25504575      PMCID: PMC4386964          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2014.280453

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  59 in total

1.  Timing-based LTP and LTD at vertical inputs to layer II/III pyramidal cells in rat barrel cortex.

Authors:  D E Feldman
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Prolonged peripheral nerve stimulation induces persistent changes in excitability of human motor cortex.

Authors:  C Shona Charlton; Michael C Ridding; Philip D Thompson; Timothy S Miles
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  2003-04-15       Impact factor: 3.181

3.  Modulation of associative human motor cortical plasticity by attention.

Authors:  Katja Stefan; Matthias Wycislo; Joseph Classen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-01-14       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Close to threshold transcranial electrical stimulation preferentially activates inhibitory networks before switching to excitation with higher intensities.

Authors:  Vera Moliadze; Deniz Atalay; Andrea Antal; Walter Paulus
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 8.955

5.  Comparatively weak after-effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) on cortical excitability in humans.

Authors:  Andrea Antal; Klára Boros; Csaba Poreisz; Leila Chaieb; Daniella Terney; Walter Paulus
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2007-12-03       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 6.  Modelling non-invasive brain stimulation in cognitive neuroscience.

Authors:  Carlo Miniussi; Justin A Harris; Manuela Ruzzoli
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 8.989

7.  Induction of persistent changes in the organisation of the human motor cortex.

Authors:  Darrin R McKay; Michael C Ridding; Philip D Thompson; Timothy S Miles
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-01-26       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Mechanisms of motor-evoked potential facilitation following prolonged dual peripheral and central stimulation in humans.

Authors:  M C Ridding; J L Taylor
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2001-12-01       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS).

Authors:  Andrea Antal; Walter Paulus
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  A common polymorphism in the brain-derived neurotrophic factor gene (BDNF) modulates human cortical plasticity and the response to rTMS.

Authors:  Binith Cheeran; Penelope Talelli; Francesco Mori; Giacomo Koch; Antonio Suppa; Mark Edwards; Henry Houlden; Kailash Bhatia; Richard Greenwood; John C Rothwell
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2008-10-09       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  7 in total

1.  Stimulation is never quite as simple as it seems.

Authors:  Charlotte J Stagg
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Associative plasticity in the human motor cortex is enhanced by concurrently targeting separate muscle representations with excitatory and inhibitory protocols.

Authors:  Marc R Kamke; Abbey S Nydam; Martin V Sale; Jason B Mattingley
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Higher-order power harmonics of pulsed electrical stimulation modulates corticospinal contribution of peripheral nerve stimulation.

Authors:  Chiun-Fan Chen; Marom Bikson; Li-Wei Chou; Chunlei Shan; Niranjan Khadka; Wen-Shiang Chen; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Shaping the Effects of Associative Brain Stimulation by Contractions of the Opposite Limb.

Authors:  Richard G Carson; Michelle L Rankin
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-11-19

Review 5.  Transcranial brain stimulation: closing the loop between brain and stimulation.

Authors:  Anke Karabanov; Axel Thielscher; Hartwig Roman Siebner
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 5.710

6.  Is two better than one? Muscle vibration plus robotic rehabilitation to improve upper limb spasticity and function: A pilot randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Rocco Salvatore Calabrò; Antonino Naro; Margherita Russo; Demetrio Milardi; Antonino Leo; Serena Filoni; Antonia Trinchera; Placido Bramanti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  A Bayesian approach to analysing cortico-cortical associative stimulation induced increases in the excitability of corticospinal projections in humans.

Authors:  Richard G Carson; Antonio Capozio; Emmet McNickle; Alexander T Sack
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 1.972

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.