Literature DB >> 28243779

Cross-education of muscular strength is facilitated by homeostatic plasticity.

Ashlyn K Frazer1, Jacqueline Williams2, Michael Spittle2, Dawson J Kidgell3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We examined the effect of priming the ipsilateral motor cortex (M1) using anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) prior to a single bout of strength training on the cross-transfer of strength and corticospinal excitability and inhibition of the ipsilateral M1.
METHODS: In a randomized double-blinded cross-over design, changes in strength and indices of corticospinal plasticity were analysed in 13 adults who were exposed to 20 min of ipsilateral anodal and sham tDCS (applied to the ipsilateral M1 to the training arm) followed by a single strength training session of the right Biceps Brachii only.
RESULTS: The induction of homeostatic plasticity via anodal tDCS priming, significantly increased strength of the untrained left Biceps Brachii (12%) compared to sham tDCS (2%), increased corticospinal excitability (12-33%) and cross-activation (25%) when ipsilateral anodal tDCS was applied to the right M1 prior to a single session of strength training. Interestingly, ipsilateral sham tDCS and strength training resulted in an average increase in MEP amplitude of 2-32%.
CONCLUSION: The novel findings of this study include: priming the ipsilateral M1 via anodal tDCS prior to a single bout of strength training augments the cross-transfer of strength which is manifested by an increase in corticospinal excitability and cross-activation. These findings provide insight into how priming methods that induce homeostatic plasticity may be used to enhance the cross-education phenomenon.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cross-education; Homeostatic plasticity; Priming; Strength training; Transcranial direct current stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28243779     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-017-3538-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  67 in total

1.  A safety screening questionnaire for transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  J C Keel; M J Smith; E M Wassermann
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 2.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation in neurology.

Authors:  Masahito Kobayashi; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 44.182

Review 3.  Modifying motor learning through gating and homeostatic metaplasticity.

Authors:  Ulf Ziemann; Hartwig R Siebner
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2007-12-03       Impact factor: 8.955

4.  Resistance training for strength: effect of number of sets and contraction speed.

Authors:  Joanne Munn; Robert D Herbert; Mark J Hancock; Simon C Gandevia
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.411

5.  The origin of activity in the biceps brachii muscle during voluntary contractions of the contralateral elbow flexor muscles.

Authors:  Inge Zijdewind; Jane E Butler; Simon C Gandevia; Janet L Taylor
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-08-22       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Mechanisms underlying functional changes in the primary motor cortex ipsilateral to an active hand.

Authors:  Monica A Perez; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  At-home resistance tubing strength training increases shoulder strength in the trained and untrained limb.

Authors:  C R A Magnus; K Boychuk; S Y Kim; J P Farthing
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 4.221

8.  Anodal-tDCS applied during unilateral strength training increases strength and corticospinal excitability in the untrained homologous muscle.

Authors:  Ashlee M Hendy; Dawson J Kidgell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Interhemispheric plasticity in humans.

Authors:  Tibor Hortobágyi; Sarah Pirio Richardson; Mikhael Lomarev; Ejaz Shamim; Sabine Meunier; Heike Russman; Nguyet Dang; Mark Hallett
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 5.411

10.  Comparison of the after-effects of transcranial direct current stimulation over the motor cortex in patients with stroke and healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Kanjiro Suzuki; Toshiyuki Fujiwara; Naofumi Tanaka; Tetsuya Tsuji; Yoshihisa Masakado; Kimitaka Hase; Akio Kimura; Meigen Liu
Journal:  Int J Neurosci       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 2.292

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Determining the potential sites of neural adaptation to cross-education: implications for the cross-education of muscle strength.

Authors:  Ashlyn K Frazer; Alan J Pearce; Glyn Howatson; Kevin Thomas; Stuart Goodall; Dawson J Kidgell
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  The ipsilateral corticospinal responses to cross-education are dependent upon the motor-training intervention.

Authors:  Michael Leung; Timo Rantalainen; Wei-Peng Teo; Dawson Kidgell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The cross education of strength and skill following unilateral strength training in the upper and lower limbs.

Authors:  Lara A Green; David A Gabriel
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  The Impact of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Upper-Limb Motor Performance in Healthy Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Ronak Patel; James Ashcroft; Ashish Patel; Hutan Ashrafian; Adam J Woods; Harsimrat Singh; Ara Darzi; Daniel Richard Leff
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 4.677

5.  Contralateral Effects of Unilateral Strength and Skill Training: Modified Delphi Consensus to Establish Key Aspects of Cross-Education.

Authors:  A Manca; T Hortobágyi; T J Carroll; R M Enoka; J P Farthing; S C Gandevia; D J Kidgell; J L Taylor; F Deriu
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 11.136

6.  Effectiveness of Unihemispheric Concurrent Dual-Site Stimulation over M1 and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Stimulation on Pain Processing: A Triple Blind Cross-Over Control Trial.

Authors:  Francisco Gurdiel-Álvarez; Yeray González-Zamorano; Sergio Lerma Lara; Julio Gómez-Soriano; Julian Taylor; Juan Pablo Romero; María Gómez Jiménez; Josué Fernández-Carnero
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-02-04

7.  Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Enhances Muscle Strength of Non-dominant Knee in Healthy Young Males.

Authors:  Panpan Lu; Nicholas J Hanson; Lin Wen; Feng Guo; Xiaoyu Tian
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 4.566

8.  Halo Sport Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Improved Muscular Endurance Performance and Neuromuscular Efficiency During an Isometric Submaximal Fatiguing Elbow Flexion Task.

Authors:  Lejun Wang; Ce Wang; Hua Yang; Qineng Shao; Wenxin Niu; Ye Yang; Fanhui Zheng
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Upper Limb Muscle Strength and Endurance in Healthy Individuals: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Kun Hu; Yu Chen; Feng Guo; Xin Wang
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 4.566

10.  Neuroenhancement of surgeons during robotic suturing.

Authors:  Harsimrat Singh; Daniel Richard Leff; Ronak Patel; Yusuke Suwa; James Kinross; Alexander von Roon; Adam J Woods; Ara Darzi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 3.453

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.