Literature DB >> 31315515

Bilateral Contralaterally Controlled Functional Electrical Stimulation Reveals New Insights Into the Interhemispheric Competition Model in Chronic Stroke.

David A Cunningham1,2,3, Jayme S Knutson1,2,3, Vishwanath Sankarasubramanian4, Kelsey A Potter-Baker5,6, Andre G Machado6, Ela B Plow6.   

Abstract

Background. Upper-limb chronic stroke hemiplegia was once thought to persist because of disproportionate amounts of inhibition imposed from the contralesional on the ipsilesional hemisphere. Thus, one rehabilitation strategy involves discouraging engagement of the contralesional hemisphere by only engaging the impaired upper limb with intensive unilateral activities. However, this premise has recently been debated and has been shown to be task specific and/or apply only to a subset of the stroke population. Bilateral rehabilitation, conversely, engages both hemispheres and has been shown to benefit motor recovery. To determine what neurophysiological strategies bilateral therapies may engage, we compared the effects of a bilateral and unilateral based therapy using transcranial magnetic stimulation. Methods. We adopted a peripheral electrical stimulation paradigm where participants received 1 session of bilateral contralaterally controlled functional electrical stimulation (CCFES) and 1 session of unilateral cyclic neuromuscular electrical stimulation (cNMES) in a repeated-measures design. In all, 15 chronic stroke participants with a wide range of motor impairments (upper extremity Fugl-Meyer score: 15 [severe] to 63 [mild]) underwent single 1-hour sessions of CCFES and cNMES. We measured whether CCFES and cNMES produced different effects on interhemispheric inhibition (IHI) to the ipsilesional hemisphere, ipsilesional corticospinal output, and ipsilateral corticospinal output originating from the contralesional hemisphere. Results. CCFES reduced IHI and maintained ipsilesional output when compared with cNMES. We found no effect on ipsilateral output for either condition. Finally, the less-impaired participants demonstrated a greater increase in ipsilesional output following CCFES. Conclusions. Our results suggest that bilateral therapies are capable of alleviating inhibition on the ipsilesional hemisphere and enhancing output to the paretic limb.

Entities:  

Keywords:  TMS; bilateral movement; functional electrical stimulation; interhemispheric competition; neuromuscular electrical stimulation; plasticity; stroke; unilateral movement

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31315515      PMCID: PMC6693953          DOI: 10.1177/1545968319863709

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair        ISSN: 1545-9683            Impact factor:   3.919


  53 in total

1.  Suppression of the transcallosal motor output: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Carlo Trompetto; Marco Bove; Lucio Marinelli; Laura Avanzino; Alessandro Buccolieri; Giovanni Abbruzzese
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-04-30       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Selective activation of ipsilateral motor pathways in intact humans.

Authors:  Toshiki Tazoe; Monica A Perez
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Contralaterally Controlled Functional Electrical Stimulation Improves Hand Dexterity in Chronic Hemiparesis: A Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Jayme S Knutson; Douglas D Gunzler; Richard D Wilson; John Chae
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 7.914

4.  Relationship of sensory organization to balance function in patients with hemiplegia.

Authors:  R P Di Fabio; M B Badke
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1990-09

5.  The potential dual role of transcallosal inhibition in post-stroke motor recovery.

Authors:  Federica Bertolucci; Carmelo Chisari; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 2.406

6.  Bilateral movement enhances ipsilesional cortical activity in acute stroke: a pilot functional MRI study.

Authors:  W R Staines; W E McIlroy; S J Graham; S E Black
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2001-02-13       Impact factor: 9.910

7.  A novel functional electrical stimulation treatment for recovery of hand function in hemiplegia: 12-week pilot study.

Authors:  Jayme S Knutson; Terri Z Hisel; Mary Y Harley; John Chae
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 3.919

8.  Influence of interhemispheric interactions on motor function in chronic stroke.

Authors:  Nagako Murase; Julie Duque; Riccardo Mazzocchio; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 10.422

9.  Ipsilesional motor deficits following stroke reflect hemispheric specializations for movement control.

Authors:  Sydney Y Schaefer; Kathleen Y Haaland; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2007-07-11       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  Effects of somatosensory stimulation on motor function in chronic cortico-subcortical strokes.

Authors:  Adriana Bastos Conforto; Leonardo G Cohen; Renata Laurenti dos Santos; Milberto Scaff; Suely Kazue Nagahashi Marie
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 4.849

View more
  6 in total

1.  Efficacy of contralaterally controlled functional electrical stimulation compared to cyclic neuromuscular electrical stimulation and task-oriented training for recovery of hand function after stroke: study protocol for a multi-site randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jayme S Knutson; Amy S Friedl; Kristine M Hansen; Mary Y Harley; A M Barrett; Preeti Raghavan; Ela B Plow; Douglas D Gunzler; John Chae
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 2.728

2.  Home-Based Functional Electrical Stimulation-Assisted Hand Therapy Video Games for Children With Hemiplegia: Development and Proof-of-Concept.

Authors:  Michael J Fu; Anna Curby; Ryan Suder; Benjamin Katholi; Jayme S Knutson
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 3.802

3.  The modulatory effects of bilateral arm training (BAT) on the brain in stroke patients: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jingyi Wu; Hao Cheng; Jiaqi Zhang; Zhongfei Bai; Sufang Cai
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 3.307

4.  Effectiveness of Contralaterally Controlled Functional Electrical Stimulation versus Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation on Upper Limb Motor Functional Recovery in Subacute Stroke Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Songhua Huang; Peile Liu; Yinglun Chen; Beiyao Gao; Yingying Li; Chan Chen; Yulong Bai
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 3.599

5.  Contralaterally controlled neuromuscular electrical stimulation-induced changes in functional connectivity in patients with stroke assessed using functional near-infrared spectroscopy.

Authors:  Chuan Guo; Youxin Sui; Sheng Xu; Ren Zhuang; Mingming Zhang; Shizhe Zhu; Jin Wang; Yushi Zhang; Chaojie Kan; Ye Shi; Tong Wang; Ying Shen
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 3.342

6.  Effectiveness of a Novel Contralaterally Controlled Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation for Restoring Lower Limb Motor Performance and Activities of Daily Living in Stroke Survivors: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Ying Shen; Lan Chen; Li Zhang; Shugang Hu; Bin Su; Huaide Qiu; Xingjun Xu; Guilan Huang; Zhifei Yin; Jinyu Yang; Chuan Guo; Tong Wang
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 3.599

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.