Literature DB >> 20929881

Mammographic density and risk of second breast cancer after ductal carcinoma in situ.

Laurel A Habel1, Angela M Capra, Ninah S Achacoso, Aradhana Janga, Luana Acton, Balaram Puligandla, Charles P Quesenberry.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We examined whether mammographic density predicts risk of second breast cancers among patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).
METHODS: The study included DCIS patients diagnosed during 1990 to 1997 and treated with breast-conserving surgery at Kaiser Permanente Northern California. Medical records were reviewed for clinical factors and subsequent breast cancers (DCIS and invasive). Ipsilateral mammograms from the index DCIS were assessed for density without knowledge of subsequent cancer status. Cox regression modeling was used to examine the association between mammographic density and risk of breast cancer events.
RESULTS: Of the 935 eligible DCIS patients, 164 (18%) had a subsequent ipsilateral breast cancer, and 59 (6%) had a new primary cancer in the contralateral breast during follow-up (median, 103 mo). Those with the greatest total area of density (upper 20% of values) were at increased risk for invasive disease in either breast [hazard ratio (HR), 2.1; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.2-3.8] or any cancer (DCIS or invasive) in the ipsilateral (HR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.0-2.9) or contralateral (HR, 3.0; 95% CI, 1.3-6.9) breast compared with those with the smallest area of density (bottom 20%). HRs for these same end points comparing those in the highest with those in the lowest American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System category were 1.6 (95% CI, 0.7-3.6), 1.3 (95% CI, 0.7-2.6), and 5.0 (95% CI, 1.4-17.9), respectively. There was a suggestion of increasing risk of contralateral, but not ipsilateral, cancer with increasing percent density.
CONCLUSIONS: Women with mammographically dense breasts may be at higher risk of subsequent breast cancer, especially in the contralateral breast. IMPACT: Information about mammographic density may help with DCIS treatment decisions. ©2010 AACR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20929881     DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0769

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  11 in total

1.  Use of annual mammography among older women with ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Phyllis Brawarsky; Bridget A Neville; Garrett M Fitzmaurice; Michael J Hassett; Jennifer S Haas
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Breast Density Awareness and Knowledge, and Intentions for Breast Cancer Screening in a Diverse Sample of Women Age Eligible for Mammography.

Authors:  Marimer Santiago-Rivas; Shayna Benjamin; Janna Z Andrews; Lina Jandorf
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 3.  Measurement of breast density with digital breast tomosynthesis--a systematic review.

Authors:  E U Ekpo; M F McEntee
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Contrast enhanced dual energy spectral mammogram, an emerging addendum in breast imaging.

Authors:  Kalpana D Kariyappa; Francis Gnanaprakasam; Subhapradha Anand; Murali Krishnaswami; Madan Ramachandran
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Dose-dependent effect of mammographic breast density on the risk of contralateral breast cancer.

Authors:  Marzana Chowdhury; David Euhus; Maureen O'Donnell; Tracy Onega; Pankaj K Choudhary; Swati Biswas
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Does Breast Density Increase the Risk of Re-excision for Women with Breast Cancer Having Breast-Conservation Therapy?

Authors:  Siun M Walsh; Sandra B Brennan; Emily C Zabor; Laura H Rosenberger; Michelle Stempel; Lizza Lebron-Zapata; Mary L Gemignani
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Mammographic breast density response to aromatase inhibition.

Authors:  Celine M Vachon; Vera J Suman; Kathleen R Brandt; Matthew L Kosel; Aman U Buzdar; Janet E Olson; Fang-Fang Wu; Lynn M Flickinger; Giske Ursin; Catherine R Elliott; Lois Shepherd; Richard M Weinshilboum; Paul E Goss; James N Ingle
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 8.  Mammographic density and breast cancer risk: current understanding and future prospects.

Authors:  Norman F Boyd; Lisa J Martin; Martin J Yaffe; Salomon Minkin
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 6.466

Review 9.  Mammographic density: a potential monitoring biomarker for adjuvant and preventative breast cancer endocrine therapies.

Authors:  Michael S Shawky; Hilary Martin; Honor J Hugo; Thomas Lloyd; Kara L Britt; Andrew Redfern; Erik W Thompson
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-01-17

10.  Role of dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography as a problem-solving tool in dense breasts: A case report.

Authors:  Teena Sleeba; Anand Subapradha; Madan Ramachandran; Murali Krishnaswami
Journal:  Indian J Radiol Imaging       Date:  2013-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.