| Literature DB >> 23457650 |
Victor H Hu1, Martin J Holland, Matthew J Burton.
Abstract
Trachoma, caused by Chlamydia trachomatis (Ct), is the leading infectious blinding disease worldwide. Chronic conjunctival inflammation develops in childhood and leads to eyelid scarring and blindness in adulthood. The immune response to Ct provides only partial protection against re-infection, which can be frequent. Moreover, the immune response is central to the development of scarring pathology, leading to loss of vision. Here we review the current literature on both protective and pathological immune responses in trachoma. The resolution of Ct infection in animal models is IFNγ-dependent, involving Th1 cells, but whether this is the case in human ocular infection still needs to be confirmed. An increasing number of studies indicate that innate immune responses arising from the epithelium and other innate immune cells, along with changes in matrix metalloproteinase activity, are important in the development of tissue damage and scarring. Current trachoma control measures, which are centred on repeated mass antibiotic treatment of populations, are logistically challenging and have the potential to drive antimicrobial resistance. A trachoma vaccine would offer significant advantages. However, limited understanding of the mechanisms of both protective immunity and immunopathology to Ct remain barriers to vaccine development.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23457650 PMCID: PMC3573101 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002020
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis ISSN: 1935-2727
Figure 1Clinical features and grades of trachoma.
N, normal; TF, Trachomatous inflammation–follicular; TI, Trachomatous inflammation–intense; TS, trachomatous scarring; TT, trachomatous trichiasis; CO, corneal opacity.
Summary of the incidence and progression rates of trachomatous scarring.
| Progression Factor | Sample Size | Follow-Up Interval | Rate | Setting | Prospective Design? | Associated Factors |
| Incident conjunctival scarring | 367 | 5 y | 20.4% | Tanzania | Yes | In children <10 y: active disease/persistent infection; female gender; age |
| Incident conjunctival scarring | 236 (age <7 y) | 7 y | 29.2% versus 9.6% | Tanzania | No | Higher rate was in children with severe-constant active disease; female gender; age |
| Worsening of conjunctival scarring | 85 | 5 y | 47.1% | Tanzania | Yes | Not specified |
| Worsening of conjunctival scarring | 213 | 14 y | 68.5% | Tunisia | No | Active disease; household density |
| From conjunctival scarring to trichiasis | 523 (all women) | 7 y | 9.2% | Tanzania | No | Active disease; chlamydial infection; increasing age |
| From conjunctival scarring to trichiasis | 297 | 12 y | 6.4% | Gambia | No | Mandinka ethnicity |
| From conjunctival scarring to trichiasis | 4,898 | 5 y | 3.2%–15.1% | Tanzania | No | Increasing age |
| From minor to major trichiasis | 55 | 1 y | 33% | Gambia | No | None mentioned |
| From minor to major trichiasis | 75 | 4 y | 37% | Gambia | No | Conjunctival inflammation |
| From unilateral to bilateral trichiasis | 46 | 1 y | 46% | Gambia | No | Baseline pannus; hot ash as an aid to epilation |
| From conjunctival scarring +/− trichiasis to corneal scarring | 302 | 12 y | 6.0% | Gambia | No | Baseline trichiasis |
| From trichiasis to corneal scarring | 211 | 4 y | 7.6% | Gambia | No | Increasing trichiasis severity; conjunctival inflammation |
| From trichiasis to corneal opacity | 4,898 | 10 y | 27.2%–53.5% | Tanzania | No | Increasing age |
| Worsening of corneal scarring | 96 | 1 y | 34% | Gambia | No | Conjunctival inflammation; bacterial growth |
Including 82 people with no scarring at baseline.
Estimated incidence rates based on age-specific prevalence of scarring, trichiasis, and corneal opacity among women.
Figure 2Histological section of the conjunctiva from a child with active trachoma.
A subepithelial follicle is seen. Kindly provided by Professor A. El-Asrar, King Saud University.
Figure 3Schemas of normal conjunctiva, active trachomatous disease, and trachomatous scarring.
Figure 4Histological sections of healthy conjunctiva and trachomatous scarring.
(Top) Healthy. (Middle and bottom) Scarred, note disruption of the epithelial and connective tissue morphology, and an increased inflammatory cells.