| Literature DB >> 18820746 |
Jonathan D King1, Jeremiah Ngondi, Gideon Gatpan, Ben Lopidia, Steve Becknell, Paul M Emerson.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Blindness due to trachoma is avoidable through Surgery, Antibiotics, Facial hygiene and Environmental improvements (SAFE). Recent surveys have shown trachoma to be a serious cause of blindness in Southern Sudan. We conducted this survey in Ayod County of Jonglei State to estimate the need for intervention activities to eliminate blinding trachoma. METHODOLOGY ANDEntities:
Mesh:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18820746 PMCID: PMC2553487 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000299
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis ISSN: 1935-2727
Figure 1Map of Southern Sudan showing survey site (Ayod County), and areas where previous surveys have been conducted and key prevalence indicators for trachoma.
TF, Prevalence of trachomatous inflammation-follicular in children aged 1–9 years; TF/TI, Prevalence of trachomatous inflammation-follicular and or trachomatous inflammation-intense in children aged 1–9 years; TT, Prevalence of trachomatous trichiasis in persons aged 15 years and above.
Figure 2The WHO simplified grading scheme for assessment of Trachoma.
Reliability among 10 survey examiners using the WHO standardized set of slides.
| Examiner | Inter-observer agreement | Kappa statistic | |||||
| TF | TI | TS | TF | TI | TS | All | |
| 1 | 95 | 93 | 98 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 0.9(0.8–1.0) |
| 2 | 95 | 93 | 95 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.9(0.7–1.0) |
| 3 | 95 | 93 | 95 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.8(0.7–1.0) |
| 4 | 100 | 83 | 90 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 0.8(0.6–0.9) |
| 5 | 98 | 85 | 85 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.7(0.6–0.9) |
| 6 | 98 | 85 | 85 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.7(0.6–0.9) |
| 7 | 90 | 75 | 90 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 0.7(0.5–0.8) |
| 8 | 90 | 78 | 88 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.6(0.5–0.8) |
| 9 | 98 | 88 | 68 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.6(0.5–0.8) |
| 10 | 85 | 68 | 90 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.6(0.5–0.7) |
| Kappa for multiple observers | 0.8(0.7–0.9) | 0.5(0.3–0.5) | 0.6(0.04–0.8) | 0.7(0.6–0.7) | |||
*: agreement with our gold standard (WHO standardized slides).
**: Combined kappa for grading all three signs (TF, TI and TS).
Figure 3Age Distribution of Survey Population, by sex.
Prevalence Estimates of the Clinical Signs of Trachoma by Age group, Ayod County, Southern Sudan 2006.
| Clinical Sign | Age <1 year | Age 1–9 years | Age 10–14 years | Age >14 years | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| TF | 66 | 67.3 (51.9–82.7) | 686 | 80.1 (73.9–86.3) | 177 | 67.3 (54.9–79.7) | 484 | 50.6 (42.3–58.9) |
| TI | 48 | 50.1 (34.3–65.9) | 481 | 60.7 (54.6–66.8) | 104 | 44.3 (36.3–52.4) | 295 | 31.0 (23.6–38.4) |
| TF and/or TI | 75 | 74.9 (63.5–86.3) | 747 | 88.3 (83.7–92.9) | 190 | 72.6 (61.3–83.8) | 586 | 59.1 (50.7–67.4) |
| TS | 6 | 10.2 (0.0–28.5) | 148 | 19.3 (15.7–23.0) | 84 | 31.7 (25.4–37.9) | 630 | 56.5 (50.5–62.4) |
| TT | 0 | - | 17 | 2.2 (0.73–3.6) | 10 | 5.2 (0.0–11.3) | 156 | 14.6 (10.9–18.3) |
| CO | 0 | - | 7 | 0.73 (0.0–1.7) | 3 | 1.1 (0.0–2.7) | 76 | 6.4 (4.5–8.3) |
| CO | 0 | - | 2 | 0.30 (0.0–0.78) | 2 | 1.0 (0.0–2.6) | 54 | 4.7 (3.4–6.0) |
95% confidence limits are in ( ).
†: Signs may occur in combination, survey participants with multiple trachoma signs appear more than once in the table.
*: Only participants presenting with CO in the presence of TT were considered to have trachomatous CO.
Figure 4Age-specific Prevalence of Active Trachoma (TF and TI), by sex.
Figure 5Age-specific Prevalence of Cicatricial Trachoma (TS and TT), by sex.
Household and Individual Characteristics.
| Characteristic | Percent | 95% CI | |
|
| Unimproved primary source of water | 78.0 | 70.1–85.8 |
|
| |||
| Time to fetch water | 39.8 | 30.2–49.3 | |
|
| |||
| Latrine Absent | 95.6 | 92.3–98.9 | |
| Solid waste disposal | 79.0 | 63.7–94.3 | |
|
| |||
| Cattle ownership | 77.9 | 72.8–83.0 | |
| Cattle kept | 53.1 | 45.9–60.3 | |
|
| |||
| Radio ownership | 16.1 | 8.1–24.0 | |
|
| Never wash children's faces | 23.2 | 10.3–36.2 |
| Unclean faces in children 1–9 yrs of age | 88.6 | 83.0–94.1 |
Summary of SAFE Intervention targets.
| Intervention | Estimated Need | Lower bound | Upper bound | |
| S |
| 5,080 persons | 3,580 | 7,910 |
| A |
| 70,000 persons | ||
| F |
| 202 (all villages) | ||
| E |
| 7,800 households | 7,010 | 8,580 |
|
| 9,560 households | 9,230 | 9,890 |
*: where applicable.