Literature DB >> 23443983

Mesh-based method for measuring intracranial volume in patients with craniosynostosis.

Antti G Ritvanen1, Marcelo Elias de Oliveira, Mika P Koivikko, Harri O Hallila, Juha K Haaja, Virve S Koljonen, Junnu P Leikola, Jyri J Hukki, Mervi M Paulasto-Kröckel.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Craniosynostosis may lead to reduced intracranial volume (ICV) and disturb normal brain growth and development. Thus, ICV is an important parameter with respect to the surgical outcome. Current methods for ICV determination from computed tomography (CT) images have drawbacks. The aim of this study was to investigate the performance of the novel mesh-based method (MBM) for ICV determination with craniosynostosis patients.
METHODS: Twenty-two patients operated on for scaphocephaly were included in this study. ICVs from preoperative, one-week postoperative, and one-year postoperative CT images were measured with MBM. The level of agreement with the manual segmentation method (MSM) was determined for the measurements of preoperative and one-year postoperative datasets. Repeatability was determined with re-measurements of six datasets. Measurement time was recorded for MBM.
RESULTS: Mean [Formula: see text] preoperative ICV values were 895.0 [Formula: see text] 153.1 [Formula: see text] and 896.4 [Formula: see text] 147.2 [Formula: see text] as measured with MBM and MSM, respectively. Corresponding one-year postoperative values were 1,238.3 [Formula: see text] 118.7 [Formula: see text] and 1,250.1 [Formula: see text] 117.5 [Formula: see text]. The MBM allowed ICV determination from one-week postoperative datasets. Measurement time with MBM was 4
CONCLUSIONS: MBM is an efficient method for determining the ICV of craniosynostosis patients, allowing the measurement of skulls with bony defects. The repeatability and short measurement time of MBM are attributable to the user interference and assessment of the measurement process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23443983     DOI: 10.1007/s11548-013-0822-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg        ISSN: 1861-6410            Impact factor:   2.924


  18 in total

Review 1.  [The treatment of craniosynostosis: indications and techniques].

Authors:  E Arnaud; D Marchac; D Renier
Journal:  Neurochirurgie       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.553

2.  Comparison of four methods for the estimation of intracranial volume: a gold standard study.

Authors:  B Sahin; N Acer; O F Sonmez; M Emirzeoglu; H Basaloglu; A Uzun; S Bilgic
Journal:  Clin Anat       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.414

3.  Evaluation of automatic measurement of the intracranial volume based on quantitative MR imaging.

Authors:  K Ambarki; T Lindqvist; A Wåhlin; E Petterson; M J B Warntjes; R Birgander; J Malm; A Eklund
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Posterior cranial vault expansion performed with rapid distraction and time-reduced consolidation in infants with syndromic craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Daniel Nowinski; Daniel Saiepour; Junnu Leikola; Elias Messo; Pelle Nilsson; Per Enblad
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2011-08-24       Impact factor: 1.475

5.  Intracranial volume change in craniosynostosis.

Authors:  S Sgouros; A D Hockley; J H Goldin; M J Wake; K Natarajan
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 5.115

6.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Premature craniosynostosis--the role of skull base surgery in its correction. A surgical and radiological experience of 172 operated infants/children.

Authors:  B J Schaller; A Filis; H A Merten; M Buchfelder
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 2.078

8.  Intracranial volume and cephalic index outcomes for total calvarial reconstruction among nonsyndromic sagittal synostosis patients.

Authors:  Justin B Heller; Misha M Heller; Bianca Knoll; Joubin S Gabbay; Charles Duncan; John A Persing
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.730

9.  Comparative reliability of total intracranial volume estimation methods and the influence of atrophy in a longitudinal semantic dementia cohort.

Authors:  George Pengas; João M S Pereira; Guy B Williams; Peter J Nestor
Journal:  J Neuroimaging       Date:  2008-05-19       Impact factor: 2.486

10.  Scaphocephaly part II: Secondary coronal synostosis after scaphocephalic surgical correction.

Authors:  Eric Arnaud; Nathalie Capon-Degardin; Joseph Michienzi; Federico Di Rocco; Dominique Renier
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.046

View more
  3 in total

1.  Estimating Intracranial Volume in Brain Research: An Evaluation of Methods.

Authors:  Saman Sargolzaei; Arman Sargolzaei; Mercedes Cabrerizo; Gang Chen; Mohammed Goryawala; Alberto Pinzon-Ardila; Sergio M Gonzalez-Arias; Malek Adjouadi
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2015-10

2.  Length of synostosis and segmented intracranial volume correlate with age in patients with non-syndromic sagittal synostosis.

Authors:  Arja Heliövaara; Junnu Leikola; Virve Koljonen; Pia Vuola; Mika Koivikko
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 1.475

3.  A practical guideline for intracranial volume estimation in patients with Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Saman Sargolzaei; Arman Sargolzaei; Mercedes Cabrerizo; Gang Chen; Mohammed Goryawala; Shirin Noei; Qi Zhou; Ranjan Duara; Warren Barker; Malek Adjouadi
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 3.169

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.