Literature DB >> 22555574

Evaluation of automatic measurement of the intracranial volume based on quantitative MR imaging.

K Ambarki1, T Lindqvist, A Wåhlin, E Petterson, M J B Warntjes, R Birgander, J Malm, A Eklund.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Brain size is commonly described in relation to ICV, whereby accurate assessment of this quantity is fundamental. Recently, an optimized MR sequence (QRAPMASTER) was developed for simultaneous quantification of T1, T2, and proton density. ICV can be measured automatically within minutes from QRAPMASTER outputs and a dedicated software, SyMRI. Automatic estimations of ICV were evaluated against the manual segmentation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 19 healthy subjects, manual segmentation of ICV was performed by 2 neuroradiologists (Obs1, Obs2) by using QBrain software and conventional T2-weighted images. The automatic segmentation from the QRAPMASTER output was performed by using SyMRI. Manual corrections of the automatic segmentation were performed (corrected-automatic) by Obs1 and Obs2, who were blinded from each other. Finally, the repeatability of the automatic method was evaluated in 6 additional healthy subjects, each having 6 repeated QRAPMASTER scans. The time required to measure ICV was recorded.
RESULTS: No significant difference was found between reference and automatic (and corrected-automatic) ICV (P > .25). The mean difference between the reference and automatic measurement was -4.84 ± 19.57 mL (or 0.31 ± 1.35%). Mean differences between the reference and the corrected-automatic measurements were -0.47 ± 17.95 mL (-0.01 ± 1.24%) and -1.26 ± 17.68 mL (-0.06 ± 1.22%) for Obs1 and Obs2, respectively. The repeatability errors of the automatic and the corrected-automatic method were <1%. The automatic method required 1 minute 11 seconds (SD = 12 seconds) of processing. Adding manual corrections required another 1 minute 32 seconds (SD = 38 seconds).
CONCLUSIONS: Automatic and corrected-automatic quantification of ICV showed good agreement with the reference method. SyMRI software provided a fast and reproducible measure of ICV.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22555574      PMCID: PMC7964602          DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  22 in total

1.  Novel whole brain segmentation and volume estimation using quantitative MRI.

Authors:  J West; J B M Warntjes; P Lundberg
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Brain ventricular size in healthy elderly: comparison between Evans index and volume measurement.

Authors:  Khalid Ambarki; Hanna Israelsson; Anders Wåhlin; Richard Birgander; Anders Eklund; Jan Malm
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.654

3.  Rapid magnetic resonance quantification on the brain: Optimization for clinical usage.

Authors:  J B M Warntjes; O Dahlqvist Leinhard; J West; P Lundberg
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Clinical and magnetic resonance imaging changes correlate in a clinical trial monitoring cyclosporine therapy for multiple sclerosis. The MS Study Group.

Authors:  G J Zhao; D K Li; J S Wolinsky; R A Koopmans; W Mietlowski; W K Redekop; A Riddehough; K Cover; D W Paty
Journal:  J Neuroimaging       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 2.486

5.  Head size, age and gender adjustment in MRI studies: a necessary nuisance?

Authors:  Josephine Barnes; Gerard R Ridgway; Jonathan Bartlett; Susie M D Henley; Manja Lehmann; Nicola Hobbs; Matthew J Clarkson; David G MacManus; Sebastien Ourselin; Nick C Fox
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Predicting MCI outcome with clinically available MRI and CSF biomarkers.

Authors:  D Heister; J B Brewer; S Magda; K Blennow; L K McEvoy
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 9.910

7.  MRI-derived measurements of human subcortical, ventricular and intracranial brain volumes: Reliability effects of scan sessions, acquisition sequences, data analyses, scanner upgrade, scanner vendors and field strengths.

Authors:  Jorge Jovicich; Silvester Czanner; Xiao Han; David Salat; Andre van der Kouwe; Brian Quinn; Jenni Pacheco; Marilyn Albert; Ronald Killiany; Deborah Blacker; Paul Maguire; Diana Rosas; Nikos Makris; Randy Gollub; Anders Dale; Bradford C Dickerson; Bruce Fischl
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Comparative reliability of total intracranial volume estimation methods and the influence of atrophy in a longitudinal semantic dementia cohort.

Authors:  George Pengas; João M S Pereira; Guy B Williams; Peter J Nestor
Journal:  J Neuroimaging       Date:  2008-05-19       Impact factor: 2.486

9.  Brain beta-amyloid measures and magnetic resonance imaging atrophy both predict time-to-progression from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Clifford R Jack; Heather J Wiste; Prashanthi Vemuri; Stephen D Weigand; Matthew L Senjem; Guang Zeng; Matt A Bernstein; Jeffrey L Gunter; Vernon S Pankratz; Paul S Aisen; Michael W Weiner; Ronald C Petersen; Leslie M Shaw; John Q Trojanowski; David S Knopman
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  Smaller intracranial volume in prodromal Huntington's disease: evidence for abnormal neurodevelopment.

Authors:  Peggy C Nopoulos; Elizabeth H Aylward; Christopher A Ross; James A Mills; Douglas R Langbehn; Hans J Johnson; Vincent A Magnotta; Ronald K Pierson; Leigh J Beglinger; Martha A Nance; Roger A Barker; Jane S Paulsen
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 13.501

View more
  16 in total

1.  Three-Dimensional Volumetric Segmentation of Pituitary Tumors: Assessment of Inter-rater Agreement and Comparison with Conventional Geometric Equations.

Authors:  Karl Lindberg; Angelica Kouti; Doerthe Ziegelitz; Tobias Hallén; Thomas Skoglund; Dan Farahmand
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2018-01-19

2.  Image quality at synthetic brain magnetic resonance imaging in children.

Authors:  So Mi Lee; Young Hun Choi; Jung-Eun Cheon; In-One Kim; Seung Hyun Cho; Won Hwa Kim; Hye Jung Kim; Hyun-Hae Cho; Sun-Kyoung You; Sook-Hyun Park; Moon Jung Hwang
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2017-06-22

3.  Estimating Intracranial Volume in Brain Research: An Evaluation of Methods.

Authors:  Saman Sargolzaei; Arman Sargolzaei; Mercedes Cabrerizo; Gang Chen; Mohammed Goryawala; Alberto Pinzon-Ardila; Sergio M Gonzalez-Arias; Malek Adjouadi
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2015-10

4.  Ventricular Volume Is More Strongly Associated with Clinical Improvement Than the Evans Index after Shunting in Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus.

Authors:  J Neikter; S Agerskov; P Hellström; M Tullberg; G Starck; D Ziegelitz; D Farahmand
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Clinical validation of synthetic brain MRI in children: initial experience.

Authors:  Hollie West; James L Leach; Blaise V Jones; Marguerite Care; Rupa Radhakrishnan; Arnold C Merrow; Enrique Alvarado; Suraj D Serai
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2016-11-26       Impact factor: 2.804

6.  Automated determination of brain parenchymal fraction in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  M Vågberg; T Lindqvist; K Ambarki; J B M Warntjes; P Sundström; R Birgander; A Svenningsson
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Transmantle Pressure Computed from MR Imaging Measurements of Aqueduct Flow and Dimensions.

Authors:  S J Sincomb; W Coenen; E Criado-Hidalgo; K Wei; K King; M Borzage; V Haughton; A L Sánchez; J C Lasheras
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-08-12       Impact factor: 4.966

8.  Mesh-based method for measuring intracranial volume in patients with craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Antti G Ritvanen; Marcelo Elias de Oliveira; Mika P Koivikko; Harri O Hallila; Juha K Haaja; Virve S Koljonen; Junnu P Leikola; Jyri J Hukki; Mervi M Paulasto-Kröckel
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 2.924

9.  Clinical Feasibility of Synthetic MRI in Multiple Sclerosis: A Diagnostic and Volumetric Validation Study.

Authors:  T Granberg; M Uppman; F Hashim; C Cananau; L E Nordin; S Shams; J Berglund; Y Forslin; P Aspelin; S Fredrikson; M Kristoffersen-Wiberg
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  Effects of gadolinium contrast agent administration on automatic brain tissue classification of patients with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  J B M Warntjes; A Tisell; A-M Landtblom; P Lundberg
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 3.825

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.