Literature DB >> 21601467

Premature craniosynostosis--the role of skull base surgery in its correction. A surgical and radiological experience of 172 operated infants/children.

B J Schaller1, A Filis, H A Merten, M Buchfelder.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Most craniofacial abnormalities are non-syndromic craniosynostoses due to premature fusion of one or more craniofacial sutures. Functional impairment is caused either by a pathological growth pattern or increased intracranial pressure. The indications for surgery are to increase intracranial volume and to correct aesthetics. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 172 patients who had been operated on for premature craniosynostosis, including fronto-orbital advancement, from 1992 to 2002. Demographic data, clinical follow-up findings, and regular photo documentation were analyzed.
RESULTS: After a mean follow-up of 6 years the overall outcome for those operated on within the first 6 months of life was satisfactory in 97%. The remaining 3% were reoperated at between 4 and 6 years of age. All cephalometric indices normalized postoperatively. Eight patients underwent SPECT studies which showed preoperative perfusion asymmetry corresponding to the fused sutures that were normalized following surgical decompression. No severe perioperative complications were seen. DISCUSSION: Cephalometric parameters represent an excellent method to compare the postoperative outcome. Standard skull base procedures need to be adapted carefully to the individual form of craniosynostosis to avoid an unfavourable result. Single Photon Emissin Computed Tomography (SPECT) studies give evidence that correction of single cranial suture synostosis allows for normalization of cerebral blood flow and should be performed within first 6-8 months of life.
Copyright © 2011 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21601467     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2011.04.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg        ISSN: 1010-5182            Impact factor:   2.078


  5 in total

1.  Effects of thyroxine exposure on the Twist 1 +/- phenotype: A test of gene-environment interaction modeling for craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Emily L Durham; R Nicole Howie; Laurel Black; Grace Bennfors; Trish E Parsons; Mohammed Elsalanty; Jack C Yu; Seth M Weinberg; James J Cray
Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol       Date:  2016-07-20

2.  Mesh-based method for measuring intracranial volume in patients with craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Antti G Ritvanen; Marcelo Elias de Oliveira; Mika P Koivikko; Harri O Hallila; Juha K Haaja; Virve S Koljonen; Junnu P Leikola; Jyri J Hukki; Mervi M Paulasto-Kröckel
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  Characterization of complications associated with open and endoscopic craniosynostosis surgery at a single institution.

Authors:  Rowland H Han; Dennis C Nguyen; Brent S Bruck; Gary B Skolnick; Chester K Yarbrough; Sybill D Naidoo; Kamlesh B Patel; Alex A Kane; Albert S Woo; Matthew D Smyth
Journal:  J Neurosurg Pediatr       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 2.375

4.  Role of 99mTc-ECD SPECT in the management of children with craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Mayadhar Barik; Minu Bajpai; Rashmi Ranajn Das; Arun Malhotra; Shasanka Shekhar Panda; Manas Kumar Sahoo; Sadanand Dwivedi
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Pancraniosynostosis following endoscopic-assisted strip craniectomy for sagittal suture craniosynostosis in the setting of poor compliance with follow-up: a case report.

Authors:  Walavan Sivakumar; Isak Goodwin; Ross Blagg; Dana Johns; Jay Riva-Cambrin; Faizi Siddiqi; Barbu Gociman
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2015-03-24
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.