BACKGROUND: We compared a dedicated cardiac camera with a traditional system for left ventricular (LV) functional measurements using gated blood-pool imaging. METHODS: 24-frame gated planar images were obtained from 48 patients in an LAO orientation for 6M counts/view on a standard gamma camera. Immediately thereafter, 24-frame ECG-gated data were obtained for 8 minutes on a dedicated cardiac SPECT camera. The gated SPECT image volumes were iteratively reconstructed and then transferred offline. In-house software was used to reproject the images into a 24-frame gated planar format. Both the original and the reprojected gated planar datasets were analyzed using semiautomated software to determine ejection fraction (EF), ventricular volume (end diastolic volume, EDV), peak ejection rate (PER), and peak filling rate (PFR). RESULTS: The difference in EF values averaged 0.4% ± 4.4%. The correlation in EF was r ≥ 0.94 (P < .01) with a linear regression slope of 0.98. Correlation of the EDV was r ≥ 0.86 (P < .01), but the volumes from the dedicated cardiac camera were smaller (linear regression slope was 0.6). Correlation of PFR and PER were r = 0.91 and r ≥ 0.83, respectively (P < .01 for both). CONCLUSIONS: Reprojection of 24-frame gated blood-pool SPECT images is an effective means of obtaining LV functional measurements with a dedicated cardiac SPECT camera using standard 2D-planar analysis tools.
BACKGROUND: We compared a dedicated cardiac camera with a traditional system for left ventricular (LV) functional measurements using gated blood-pool imaging. METHODS: 24-frame gated planar images were obtained from 48 patients in an LAO orientation for 6M counts/view on a standard gamma camera. Immediately thereafter, 24-frame ECG-gated data were obtained for 8 minutes on a dedicated cardiac SPECT camera. The gated SPECT image volumes were iteratively reconstructed and then transferred offline. In-house software was used to reproject the images into a 24-frame gated planar format. Both the original and the reprojected gated planar datasets were analyzed using semiautomated software to determine ejection fraction (EF), ventricular volume (end diastolic volume, EDV), peak ejection rate (PER), and peak filling rate (PFR). RESULTS: The difference in EF values averaged 0.4% ± 4.4%. The correlation in EF was r ≥ 0.94 (P < .01) with a linear regression slope of 0.98. Correlation of the EDV was r ≥ 0.86 (P < .01), but the volumes from the dedicated cardiac camera were smaller (linear regression slope was 0.6). Correlation of PFR and PER were r = 0.91 and r ≥ 0.83, respectively (P < .01 for both). CONCLUSIONS: Reprojection of 24-frame gated blood-pool SPECT images is an effective means of obtaining LV functional measurements with a dedicated cardiac SPECT camera using standard 2D-planar analysis tools.
Authors: James R Corbett; Olakunle O Akinboboye; Stephen L Bacharach; Jeffrey S Borer; Elias H Botvinick; E Gordon DePuey; Edward P Ficaro; Christopher L Hansen; Milena J Henzlova; Serge Van Kriekinge Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Tali Sharir; Piotr J Slomka; Sean W Hayes; Marcelo F DiCarli; Jack A Ziffer; William H Martin; Dalia Dickman; Simona Ben-Haim; Daniel S Berman Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2010-05-04 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Simona Ben-Haim; Krzysztof Kacperski; Sharon Hain; Dean Van Gramberg; Brian F Hutton; Kjell Erlandsson; Tali Sharir; Nathaniel Roth; Wendy A Waddington; Daniel S Berman; Peter J Ell Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2010-04-11 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Bernhard A Herzog; Ronny R Buechel; Ruth Katz; Michael Brueckner; Lars Husmann; Irene A Burger; Aju P Pazhenkottil; Ines Valenta; Oliver Gaemperli; Valerie Treyer; Philipp A Kaufmann Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2009-12-15 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Ronny R Buechel; Bernhard A Herzog; Lars Husmann; Irene A Burger; Aju P Pazhenkottil; Valerie Treyer; Ines Valenta; Patrick von Schulthess; René Nkoulou; Christophe A Wyss; Philipp A Kaufmann Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2010-01-27 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Vladimir V Shipulin; Sergey L Andreev; Andrew S Pryakhin; Andrew V Mochula; Alina N Maltseva; Svetlana I Sazonova; Vladimir M Shipulin; Samia Massalha; Konstantin V Zavadovsky Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2022-02-12 Impact factor: 10.057