PURPOSE: To assess the diagnostic performance of a novel ultrafast cardiac gamma camera with cadmium-zinc-telluride (CZT) solid-state semiconductor detectors for nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). METHODS: The study group comprised 75 consecutive patients (55 men, BMI range 19-45 kg/m(2)) who underwent a 1-day (99m)Tc-tetrofosmin adenosine-stress/rest imaging protocol. Scanning was performed first on a conventional dual-detector SPECT gamma camera (Ventri, GE Healthcare) with a 15-min acquisition time each for stress and rest. All scans were immediately repeated on an ultrafast CZT camera (Discovery 530 NMc, GE Healthcare) with a 3-min scan time for stress and a 2-min scan time for rest. Clinical agreement (normal, ischaemia, scar) between CZT and SPECT was assessed for each patient and for each coronary territory using SPECT MPI as the reference standard. Segmental myocardial tracer uptake values (percent of maximum) using a 20-segment model and left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) values obtained using CZT were compared with those obtained using conventional SPECT by intraclass correlation and by calculating Bland-Altman limits of agreement. RESULTS: There was excellent clinical agreement between CZT and conventional SPECT on a per-patient basis (96.0%) and on a per-vessel territory basis (96.4%) as shown by a highly significant correlation between segmental tracer uptake values (r=0.901, p<0.001). Similarly, EF values for both scanners were highly correlated (r=0.976, p<0.001) with narrow Bland-Altman limits of agreement (-5.5-10.6%). CONCLUSION: The novel CZT camera allows a more than fivefold reduction in scan time and provides clinical information equivalent to conventional standard SPECT MPI.
PURPOSE: To assess the diagnostic performance of a novel ultrafast cardiac gamma camera with cadmium-zinc-telluride (CZT) solid-state semiconductor detectors for nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). METHODS: The study group comprised 75 consecutive patients (55 men, BMI range 19-45 kg/m(2)) who underwent a 1-day (99m)Tc-tetrofosmin adenosine-stress/rest imaging protocol. Scanning was performed first on a conventional dual-detector SPECT gamma camera (Ventri, GE Healthcare) with a 15-min acquisition time each for stress and rest. All scans were immediately repeated on an ultrafast CZT camera (Discovery 530 NMc, GE Healthcare) with a 3-min scan time for stress and a 2-min scan time for rest. Clinical agreement (normal, ischaemia, scar) between CZT and SPECT was assessed for each patient and for each coronary territory using SPECT MPI as the reference standard. Segmental myocardial tracer uptake values (percent of maximum) using a 20-segment model and left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) values obtained using CZT were compared with those obtained using conventional SPECT by intraclass correlation and by calculating Bland-Altman limits of agreement. RESULTS: There was excellent clinical agreement between CZT and conventional SPECT on a per-patient basis (96.0%) and on a per-vessel territory basis (96.4%) as shown by a highly significant correlation between segmental tracer uptake values (r=0.901, p<0.001). Similarly, EF values for both scanners were highly correlated (r=0.976, p<0.001) with narrow Bland-Altman limits of agreement (-5.5-10.6%). CONCLUSION: The novel CZT camera allows a more than fivefold reduction in scan time and provides clinical information equivalent to conventional standard SPECT MPI.
Authors: Christopher L Hansen; Richard A Goldstein; Olakunle O Akinboboye; Daniel S Berman; Elias H Botvinick; Keith B Churchwell; C David Cooke; James R Corbett; S James Cullom; Seth T Dahlberg; Regina S Druz; Edward P Ficaro; James R Galt; Ravi K Garg; Guido Germano; Gary V Heller; Milena J Henzlova; Mark C Hyun; Lynne L Johnson; April Mann; Benjamin D McCallister; Robert A Quaife; Terrence D Ruddy; Senthil N Sundaram; Raymond Taillefer; R Parker Ward; John J Mahmarian Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2007 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Ines Valenta; Valerie Treyer; Lars Husmann; Oliver Gaemperli; Michael J Schindler; Bernhard A Herzog; Patrick Veit-Heibach; Ronny R Buechel; René Nkoulou; Aju P Pazhenkottil; Philipp A Kaufmann Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2009-11-18 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Akhil Kapur; Katherine A Latus; Glyn Davies; Rhanju T Dhawan; Sian Eastick; Peter H Jarritt; George Roussakis; Melanie C Young; Constantinos Anagnostopoulos; Jimmy Bomanji; Durval C Costa; Dudley J Pennell; Elizabeth M Prvulovich; Peter J Ell; S Richard Underwood Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2002-10-11 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Assuero Giorgetti; Massimiliano Rossi; Mario Stanislao; Guido Valle; Pietro Bertolaccini; Alberto Maneschi; Raffaele Giubbini; Maria Luisa De Rimini; Marco Mazzanti; Mario Cappagli; Elisa Milan; Duccio Volterrani; Paolo Marzullo Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2007-09-14 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Daniel S Berman; Xingping Kang; Balaji Tamarappoo; Arik Wolak; Sean W Hayes; Ryo Nakazato; Louise E J Thomson; Faith Kite; Ishac Cohen; Piotr J Slomka; Andrew J Einstein; John D Friedman Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2009-03
Authors: Frank J Rybicki; Hansel J Otero; Michael L Steigner; Gabriel Vorobiof; Leelakrishna Nallamshetty; Dimitrios Mitsouras; Hale Ersoy; Richard T Mather; Philip F Judy; Tianxi Cai; Karl Coyner; Kurt Schultz; Amanda G Whitmore; Marcelo F Di Carli Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2008-03-27 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Lars Husmann; Ines Valenta; Oliver Gaemperli; Olivier Adda; Valerie Treyer; Christophe A Wyss; Patrick Veit-Haibach; Fuminari Tatsugami; Gustav K von Schulthess; Philipp A Kaufmann Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2007-12-18 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: W Lane Duvall; Joseph M Sweeny; Lori B Croft; Maya H Barghash; Nitin K Kulkarni; Krista A Guma; Milena J Henzlova Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2011-06-03 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: W Lane Duvall; Joseph M Sweeny; Lori B Croft; Eric Ginsberg; Krista A Guma; Milena J Henzlova Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2011-12-07 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Michael Fiechter; Jelena R Ghadri; Mathias Wolfrum; Silke M Kuest; Aju P Pazhenkottil; Rene N Nkoulou; Bernhard A Herzog; Cathérine Gebhard; Tobias A Fuchs; Oliver Gaemperli; Philipp A Kaufmann Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2011-12-06 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Grant T Gullberg; Bryan W Reutter; Arkadiusz Sitek; Jonathan S Maltz; Thomas F Budinger Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2010-09-22 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Ryo Nakazato; Daniel S Berman; Sean W Hayes; Mathews Fish; Richard Padgett; Yuan Xu; Mark Lemley; Rafael Baavour; Nathaniel Roth; Piotr J Slomka Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2013-01-15 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Julian Betancur; Frederic Commandeur; Mahsaw Motlagh; Tali Sharir; Andrew J Einstein; Sabahat Bokhari; Mathews B Fish; Terrence D Ruddy; Philipp Kaufmann; Albert J Sinusas; Edward J Miller; Timothy M Bateman; Sharmila Dorbala; Marcelo Di Carli; Guido Germano; Yuka Otaki; Balaji K Tamarappoo; Damini Dey; Daniel S Berman; Piotr J Slomka Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2018-03-14