Literature DB >> 23433270

Making the best match: selecting outcome measures for clinical trials and outcome studies.

Wendy J Coster1.   

Abstract

Selecting an appropriate outcome measure is a critical step in designing valid and useful clinical trials and outcome studies. This selection process needs to extend beyond examining basic psychometric properties to consider additional features of instruments that may affect their validity and utility for the study's purpose. This article discusses these additional factors and their potential impact on outcome measurement. Guidelines are proposed to help clinical researchers and consumers of clinical research literature evaluate the match between the study purpose, population, and instrument.
Copyright © 2013 by the American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23433270      PMCID: PMC3628620          DOI: 10.5014/ajot.2013.006015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Occup Ther        ISSN: 0272-9490


  15 in total

1.  Using IRT variable maps to enrich understanding of rehabilitation data.

Authors:  W Coster; L Ludlow; M Mancini
Journal:  J Outcome Meas       Date:  1999

Review 2.  Outcome measures in acute stroke trials: a systematic review and some recommendations to improve practice.

Authors:  P W Duncan; H S Jorgensen; D T Wade
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 7.914

3.  Disentangling the disablement process.

Authors:  R H Lawrence; A M Jette
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 4.077

4.  Measuring patient-reported outcomes after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation settings.

Authors:  Wendy J Coster; Stephen M Haley; Alan M Jette
Journal:  J Rehabil Med       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.912

Review 5.  Longitudinal construct validity: establishment of clinical meaning in patient evaluative instruments.

Authors:  M H Liang
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Responsiveness of functional health status measures frequently used in stroke research.

Authors:  V P M Schepers; M Ketelaar; J M A Visser-Meily; J Dekker; E Lindeman
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 3.033

7.  Enabling our instruments: accommodation, universal design, and access to participation in research.

Authors:  A R Meyers; E M Andresen
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.966

8.  Defining post-stroke recovery: implications for design and interpretation of drug trials.

Authors:  P W Duncan; S M Lai; J Keighley
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2000-03-03       Impact factor: 5.250

9.  Sensitivity to changes in disability after stroke: a comparison of four scales useful in clinical trials.

Authors:  Alexander W Dromerick; Dorothy F Edwards; Michael N Diringer
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb

10.  Measuring change in disability after inpatient rehabilitation: comparison of the responsiveness of the Barthel index and the Functional Independence Measure.

Authors:  J J van der Putten; J C Hobart; J A Freeman; A J Thompson
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 10.154

View more
  39 in total

Review 1.  Critical Appraisal of the Quality of Literature Evaluating Psychometric Properties of Arthritis Work Outcome Assessments: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Rawan Alheresh; Molly Vaughan; Michael P LaValley; Wendy Coster; Julie J Keysor
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 4.794

2.  Special issue on the Accelerating Clinical Trials and Outcomes Research (ACTOR) Conference.

Authors:  Susan H Lin
Journal:  Am J Occup Ther       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr

3.  Trade-Offs in Quality-of-Life Assessment Between the Modified Rankin Scale and Neuro-QoL Measures.

Authors:  Robert L Askew; Carmen E Capo-Lugo; Rajbeer Sangha; Andrew Naidech; Shyam Prabhakaran
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 5.725

Review 4.  Assessing treatment outcomes in multiple sclerosis trials and in the clinical setting.

Authors:  Carmen Tur; Marcello Moccia; Frederik Barkhof; Jeremy Chataway; Jaume Sastre-Garriga; Alan J Thompson; Olga Ciccarelli
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 42.937

5.  Completeness of Outcomes Description Reported in Low Back Pain Rehabilitation Interventions: A Survey of 185 Randomized Trials.

Authors:  Silvia Gianola; Pamela Frigerio; Michela Agostini; Rosa Bolotta; Greta Castellini; Davide Corbetta; Monica Gasparini; Paolo Gozzer; Erica Guariento; Linda C Li; Valentina Pecoraro; Valeria Sirtori; Andrea Turolla; Anita Andreano; Lorenzo Moja
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.037

6.  Translation and adaptation of three English tinnitus patient-reported outcome measures to Spanish.

Authors:  Vinaya Manchaiah; María F Muñoz; Elia Hatfield; Marc A Fagelson; Elizabeth Parks Aronson; Gerhard Andersson; Eldré W Beukes
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 2.117

Review 7.  National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale as an Outcome in Stroke Research: Value of ANCOVA Over Analyzing Change From Baseline.

Authors:  Eva A Mistry; Sharon D Yeatts; Pooja Khatri; Akshitkumar M Mistry; Michelle Detry; Kert Viele; Frank E Harrell; Roger J Lewis
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 7.914

8.  Evaluating the Effectiveness of an Autism-Specific Workplace Tool for Employers: A Randomised Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Melissa Scott; Marita Falkmer; Torbjörn Falkmer; Sonya Girdler
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2018-10

9.  Does Naming Therapy Make Ordering in a Restaurant Easier? Dynamics of Co-Occurring Change in Cognitive-Linguistic and Functional Communication Skills in Aphasia.

Authors:  Erin L Meier; Jeffrey P Johnson; Sarah Villard; Swathi Kiran
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 2.408

Review 10.  Effects, barriers and facilitators in predischarge home assessments to improve the transition of care from the inpatient care to home in adult patients: an integrative review.

Authors:  Uta Kirchner-Heklau; Kai Krause; Susanne Saal
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.