Robert L Askew1, Carmen E Capo-Lugo2, Rajbeer Sangha3, Andrew Naidech4, Shyam Prabhakaran5. 1. Department of Psychology, Stetson University, DeLand, FL, USA. Electronic address: raskew@stetson.edu. 2. Department of Physical Therapy, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA. 3. Department of Neurology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA. 4. Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA. 5. Department of Neurology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: We aimed to describe the physical and cognitive health of patients with differing levels of post-stroke disability, as defined by modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores. We also compared cross-sectional correlations between the mRS and the Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QoL) T-scores to longitudinal correlations of change estimates from each measure. METHODS: Mean Neuro-QoL T-scores representing mobility, dexterity, executive function, and cognitive concerns were compared among mRS subgroups. Fixed-effects regression models with robust standard errors estimated correlations among mRS and Neuro-QoL domain scores and correlations among longitudinal change estimates. These change estimates were then compared to distribution-based estimates of minimal clinically important differences. RESULTS: Seven hundred forty-five patients with ischemic stroke (79%) or transient ischemic attack (21%) were enrolled in this longitudinal observational study of post-stroke outcomes. Larger differences in cognitive function were observed in the severe mRS groups (ie, 4-5) while larger differences in physical function were observed in the mild-moderate mRS groups (ie, 0-2). Cross-sectional correlations among mRS and Neuro-QoL T-scores were high (r = 0.61-0.83), but correlations among longitudinal change estimates were weak (r = 0.14-0.44). CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this study undermine the validity and utility of the mRS as an outcome measure in longitudinal studies in ischemic stroke patients. Nevertheless, strong correlations indicate that the mRS score, obtained with a single interview, is efficient at capturing important differences in patient-reported quality of life, and is useful for identifying meaningful cross-sectional differences among clinical subgroups.
INTRODUCTION: We aimed to describe the physical and cognitive health of patients with differing levels of post-stroke disability, as defined by modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores. We also compared cross-sectional correlations between the mRS and the Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QoL) T-scores to longitudinal correlations of change estimates from each measure. METHODS: Mean Neuro-QoL T-scores representing mobility, dexterity, executive function, and cognitive concerns were compared among mRS subgroups. Fixed-effects regression models with robust standard errors estimated correlations among mRS and Neuro-QoL domain scores and correlations among longitudinal change estimates. These change estimates were then compared to distribution-based estimates of minimal clinically important differences. RESULTS: Seven hundred forty-five patients with ischemic stroke (79%) or transient ischemic attack (21%) were enrolled in this longitudinal observational study of post-stroke outcomes. Larger differences in cognitive function were observed in the severe mRS groups (ie, 4-5) while larger differences in physical function were observed in the mild-moderate mRS groups (ie, 0-2). Cross-sectional correlations among mRS and Neuro-QoL T-scores were high (r = 0.61-0.83), but correlations among longitudinal change estimates were weak (r = 0.14-0.44). CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this study undermine the validity and utility of the mRS as an outcome measure in longitudinal studies in ischemic strokepatients. Nevertheless, strong correlations indicate that the mRS score, obtained with a single interview, is efficient at capturing important differences in patient-reported quality of life, and is useful for identifying meaningful cross-sectional differences among clinical subgroups.
Authors: David Cella; William Riley; Arthur Stone; Nan Rothrock; Bryce Reeve; Susan Yount; Dagmar Amtmann; Rita Bode; Daniel Buysse; Seung Choi; Karon Cook; Robert Devellis; Darren DeWalt; James F Fries; Richard Gershon; Elizabeth A Hahn; Jin-Shei Lai; Paul Pilkonis; Dennis Revicki; Matthias Rose; Kevin Weinfurt; Ron Hays Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 2010-08-04 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: Richard C Gershon; Jin Shei Lai; Rita Bode; Seung Choi; Claudia Moy; Tom Bleck; Deborah Miller; Amy Peterman; David Cella Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2011-08-27 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Andrew M Naidech; Jennifer L Beaumont; Neil F Rosenberg; Matthew B Maas; Adam R Kosteva; Michael L Ault; David Cella; E Wesley Ely Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2013-12-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Benjamin D Schalet; Paul A Pilkonis; Lan Yu; Nathan Dodds; Kelly L Johnston; Susan Yount; William Riley; David Cella Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 2016-02-27 Impact factor: 6.437