Literature DB >> 23431202

Sensory adaptation as optimal resource allocation.

Sergei Gepshtein1, Luis A Lesmes, Thomas D Albright.   

Abstract

Visual adaptation is expected to improve visual performance in the new environment. This expectation has been contradicted by evidence that adaptation sometimes decreases sensitivity for the adapting stimuli, and sometimes it changes sensitivity for stimuli very different from the adapting ones. We hypothesize that this pattern of results can be explained by a process that optimizes sensitivity for many stimuli, rather than changing sensitivity only for those stimuli whose statistics have changed. To test this hypothesis, we measured visual sensitivity across a broad range of spatiotemporal modulations of luminance, while varying the distribution of stimulus speeds. The manipulation of stimulus statistics caused a large-scale reorganization of visual sensitivity, forming the orderly pattern of sensitivity gains and losses. This pattern is predicted by a theory of distribution of receptive field characteristics in the visual system.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23431202      PMCID: PMC3600488          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1204109110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  46 in total

1.  Bayesian adaptive estimation of the contrast sensitivity function: the quick CSF method.

Authors:  Luis Andres Lesmes; Zhong-Lin Lu; Jongsoo Baek; Thomas D Albright
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Adaptation in macaque MT reduces perceived speed and improves speed discrimination.

Authors:  Bart Krekelberg; Richard J A van Wezel; Thomas D Albright
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-09-28       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Bayesian inference with probabilistic population codes.

Authors:  Wei Ji Ma; Jeffrey M Beck; Peter E Latham; Alexandre Pouget
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2006-10-22       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Adaptive filtering enhances information transmission in visual cortex.

Authors:  Tatyana O Sharpee; Hiroki Sugihara; Andrei V Kurgansky; Sergei P Rebrik; Michael P Stryker; Kenneth D Miller
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-02-23       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  The economics of motion perception and invariants of visual sensitivity.

Authors:  Sergei Gepshtein; Ivan Tyukin; Michael Kubovy
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-06-21       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  How do attention and adaptation affect contrast sensitivity?

Authors:  Franco Pestilli; Gerardo Viera; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-05-30       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Receptive field shift and shrinkage in macaque middle temporal area through attentional gain modulation.

Authors:  Thilo Womelsdorf; Katharina Anton-Erxleben; Stefan Treue
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Effects of orientation-specific visual deprivation induced with altered reality.

Authors:  Peng Zhang; Min Bao; Miyoung Kwon; Sheng He; Stephen A Engel
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 9.  Decision-theoretic models of visual perception and action.

Authors:  Laurence T Maloney; Hang Zhang
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-10-23       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Attention to stimulus features shifts spectral tuning of V4 neurons during natural vision.

Authors:  Stephen V David; Benjamin Y Hayden; James A Mazer; Jack L Gallant
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2008-08-14       Impact factor: 17.173

View more
  24 in total

1.  Using 10AFC to further improve the efficiency of the quick CSF method.

Authors:  Fang Hou; Luis Lesmes; Peter Bex; Michael Dorr; Zhong-Lin Lu
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Compressive mapping of number to space reflects dynamic encoding mechanisms, not static logarithmic transform.

Authors:  Guido Marco Cicchini; Giovanni Anobile; David C Burr
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Effects of surround suppression on response adaptation of V1 neurons to visual stimuli.

Authors:  Peng Li; Cai-Hong Jin; San Jiang; Miao-Miao Li; Zi-Lu Wang; Hui Zhu; Cui-Yun Chen; Tian-Miao Hua
Journal:  Dongwuxue Yanjiu       Date:  2014-09

4.  Serial dependence in position occurs at the time of perception.

Authors:  Mauro Manassi; Alina Liberman; Anna Kosovicheva; Kathy Zhang; David Whitney
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-12

5.  Visual Adaptation.

Authors:  Michael A Webster
Journal:  Annu Rev Vis Sci       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 6.422

6.  Paradoxical perception of object identity in visual motion.

Authors:  Aleksandra Zharikova; Sergei Gepshtein; Cees van Leeuwen
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Mechanisms of Spatiotemporal Selectivity in Cortical Area MT.

Authors:  Ambarish S Pawar; Sergei Gepshtein; Sergey Savel'ev; Thomas D Albright
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2018-12-31       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Sensory optimization by stochastic tuning.

Authors:  Peter Jurica; Sergei Gepshtein; Ivan Tyukin; Cees van Leeuwen
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Adaptive Optimization of Visual Sensitivity.

Authors:  Sergei Gepshtein; Thomas D Albright
Journal:  J Indian Inst Sci       Date:  2017-11-25

10.  Effects of Signal-to-Noise Ratio on Auditory Cortical Frequency Processing.

Authors:  Magnus J Teschner; Bryan A Seybold; Brian J Malone; Jana Hüning; Christoph E Schreiner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.