Literature DB >> 16495990

Adaptive filtering enhances information transmission in visual cortex.

Tatyana O Sharpee1, Hiroki Sugihara, Andrei V Kurgansky, Sergei P Rebrik, Michael P Stryker, Kenneth D Miller.   

Abstract

Sensory neuroscience seeks to understand how the brain encodes natural environments. However, neural coding has largely been studied using simplified stimuli. In order to assess whether the brain's coding strategy depends on the stimulus ensemble, we apply a new information-theoretic method that allows unbiased calculation of neural filters (receptive fields) from responses to natural scenes or other complex signals with strong multipoint correlations. In the cat primary visual cortex we compare responses to natural inputs with those to noise inputs matched for luminance and contrast. We find that neural filters adaptively change with the input ensemble so as to increase the information carried by the neural response about the filtered stimulus. Adaptation affects the spatial frequency composition of the filter, enhancing sensitivity to under-represented frequencies in agreement with optimal encoding arguments. Adaptation occurs over 40 s to many minutes, longer than most previously reported forms of adaptation.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16495990      PMCID: PMC2562720          DOI: 10.1038/nature04519

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  39 in total

1.  Spatial scale and cellular substrate of contrast adaptation by retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  S P Brown; R H Masland
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Adaptation-induced plasticity of orientation tuning in adult visual cortex.

Authors:  V Dragoi; J Sharma; M Sur
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Synergy in a neural code.

Authors:  N Brenner; S P Strong; R Koberle; W Bialek; R R de Ruyter van Steveninck
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.026

4.  Receptive field structure of neurons in monkey primary visual cortex revealed by stimulation with natural image sequences.

Authors:  Dario L Ringach; Michael J Hawken; Robert Shapley
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Natural stimulus statistics alter the receptive field structure of v1 neurons.

Authors:  Stephen V David; William E Vinje; Jack L Gallant
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-08-04       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Analyzing neural responses to natural signals: maximally informative dimensions.

Authors:  Tatyana Sharpee; Nicole C Rust; William Bialek
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.026

7.  Adaptation in single units in visual cortex: the tuning of aftereffects in the spatial domain.

Authors:  A B Saul; M S Cynader
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.241

8.  Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells.

Authors:  D J Field
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 2.129

9.  Adaptation to spatial stimuli.

Authors:  C Blakemore; F W Campbell
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1969-01       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  The contrast gain control of the cat retina.

Authors:  R Shapley; J D Victor
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  129 in total

1.  Local sensitivity to stimulus orientation and spatial frequency within the receptive fields of neurons in visual area 2 of macaque monkeys.

Authors:  X Tao; B Zhang; E L Smith; S Nishimoto; I Ohzawa; Y M Chino
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Adaptive switches in midbrain circuits.

Authors:  Tatyana O Sharpee
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  The accuracy of membrane potential reconstruction based on spiking receptive fields.

Authors:  Deepankar Mohanty; Benjamin Scholl; Nicholas J Priebe
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Receptive field dimensionality increases from the auditory midbrain to cortex.

Authors:  Craig A Atencio; Tatyana O Sharpee; Christoph E Schreiner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  The influence of surround suppression on adaptation effects in primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Stephanie C Wissig; Adam Kohn
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Distinct mechanism for long-term contrast adaptation.

Authors:  Min Bao; Stephen A Engel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Characterizing responses of translation-invariant neurons to natural stimuli: maximally informative invariant dimensions.

Authors:  Michael Eickenberg; Ryan J Rowekamp; Minjoon Kouh; Tatyana O Sharpee
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 2.026

8.  Sub- and suprathreshold adaptation currents have opposite effects on frequency tuning.

Authors:  Tara Deemyad; Jens Kroeger; Maurice J Chacron
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Heterogeneous response dynamics in retinal ganglion cells: the interplay of predictive coding and adaptation.

Authors:  Sheila Nirenberg; Illya Bomash; Jonathan W Pillow; Jonathan D Victor
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Recurrent antitopographic inhibition mediates competitive stimulus selection in an attention network.

Authors:  Dihui Lai; Sebastian Brandt; Harald Luksch; Ralf Wessel
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.