Literature DB >> 20932856

Decision-theoretic models of visual perception and action.

Laurence T Maloney1, Hang Zhang.   

Abstract

Statistical decision theory (SDT) and Bayesian decision theory (BDT) are closely related mathematical frameworks used to model ideal performance in a wide range of visual and motor tasks. Their elements (gain function, likelihood, prior) are readily interpretable in terms of information available to the observer. We briefly describe SDT and BDT and then review recent work employing them as models of biological perception or action. We emphasize work that employs gain functions and priors as independent or dependent variables. At one extreme, Bayesian decision theory allows the experimenter to compute ideal performance in specific tasks and compare human performance to ideal (Geisler, 1989). No claim is made that visual processing is in any sense "Bayesian". At the other extreme, researchers have proposed Bayesian decision theory as a process model of "perception as Bayesian inference" (Knill & Richards, 1996). We end by discussing how possible ideal models are related to imperfect, actual observers and how the "Bayesian hypothesis" can be tested experimentally.
Copyright © 2010. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20932856     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.09.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  41 in total

1.  Energy-based stochastic control of neural mass models suggests time-varying effective connectivity in the resting state.

Authors:  Roberto C Sotero; Amir Shmuel
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 1.621

Review 2.  Motor control is decision-making.

Authors:  Daniel M Wolpert; Michael S Landy
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 6.627

3.  One mirror effect: The regularities of recognition memory.

Authors:  Andrew Hilford; Murray Glanzer; Kisok Kim; Laurence T Maloney
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-02

4.  Tuning your priors to the world.

Authors:  Jacob Feldman
Journal:  Top Cogn Sci       Date:  2013-01

5.  Sensory adaptation as optimal resource allocation.

Authors:  Sergei Gepshtein; Luis A Lesmes; Thomas D Albright
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Recentering bias for temporal saccades only: Evidence from binocular recordings of eye movements.

Authors:  Jérôme Tagu; Karine Doré-Mazars; Judith Vergne; Christelle Lemoine-Lardennois; Dorine Vergilino-Perez
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Rethinking human visual attention: spatial cueing effects and optimality of decisions by honeybees, monkeys and humans.

Authors:  Miguel P Eckstein; Stephen C Mack; Dorion B Liston; Lisa Bogush; Randolf Menzel; Richard J Krauzlis
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Visual extrapolation under risk: human observers estimate and compensate for exogenous uncertainty.

Authors:  Paul A Warren; Erich W Graf; Rebecca A Champion; Laurence T Maloney
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Sensory optimization by stochastic tuning.

Authors:  Peter Jurica; Sergei Gepshtein; Ivan Tyukin; Cees van Leeuwen
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Suboptimality in Perceptual Decision Making.

Authors:  Dobromir Rahnev; Rachel N Denison
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 12.579

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.