Literature DB >> 24219849

Sensory optimization by stochastic tuning.

Peter Jurica1, Sergei Gepshtein, Ivan Tyukin, Cees van Leeuwen.   

Abstract

Individually, visual neurons are each selective for several aspects of stimulation, such as stimulus location, frequency content, and speed. Collectively, the neurons implement the visual system's preferential sensitivity to some stimuli over others, manifested in behavioral sensitivity functions. We ask how the individual neurons are coordinated to optimize visual sensitivity. We model synaptic plasticity in a generic neural circuit and find that stochastic changes in strengths of synaptic connections entail fluctuations in parameters of neural receptive fields. The fluctuations correlate with uncertainty of sensory measurement in individual neurons: The higher the uncertainty the larger the amplitude of fluctuation. We show that this simple relationship is sufficient for the stochastic fluctuations to steer sensitivities of neurons toward a characteristic distribution, from which follows a sensitivity function observed in human psychophysics and which is predicted by a theory of optimal allocation of receptive fields. The optimal allocation arises in our simulations without supervision or feedback about system performance and independently of coupling between neurons, making the system highly adaptive and sensitive to prevailing stimulation. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2013 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24219849      PMCID: PMC3877163          DOI: 10.1037/a0034192

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Rev        ISSN: 0033-295X            Impact factor:   8.934


  54 in total

1.  Direction opponency, not quadrature, is key to the 1/4 cycle preference for apparent motion in the motion energy model.

Authors:  Nicolas Heess; Wyeth Bair
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Spatiotemporal specificity of neuronal activity directs the modification of receptive fields in the developing retinotectal system.

Authors:  Rebecca L Vislay-Meltzer; Adam R Kampff; Florian Engert
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2006-04-06       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  'Infotaxis' as a strategy for searching without gradients.

Authors:  Massimo Vergassola; Emmanuel Villermaux; Boris I Shraiman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-01-25       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  The economics of motion perception and invariants of visual sensitivity.

Authors:  Sergei Gepshtein; Ivan Tyukin; Michael Kubovy
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-06-21       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 5.  The benefits of noise in neural systems: bridging theory and experiment.

Authors:  Mark D McDonnell; Lawrence M Ward
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 34.870

6.  Pattern recognition and the responses of sensory neurons.

Authors:  H B Barlow
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1969-04-21       Impact factor: 5.691

7.  Motion and vision. II. Stabilized spatio-temporal threshold surface.

Authors:  D H Kelly
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1979-10

8.  Toward a modern theory of adaptive networks: expectation and prediction.

Authors:  R S Sutton; A G Barto
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Model of human visual-motion sensing.

Authors:  A B Watson; A J Ahumada
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 2.129

10.  Reinforcement learning or active inference?

Authors:  Karl J Friston; Jean Daunizeau; Stefan J Kiebel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  4 in total

1.  Paradoxical perception of object identity in visual motion.

Authors:  Aleksandra Zharikova; Sergei Gepshtein; Cees van Leeuwen
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  High-Dimensional Brain: A Tool for Encoding and Rapid Learning of Memories by Single Neurons.

Authors:  Ivan Tyukin; Alexander N Gorban; Carlos Calvo; Julia Makarova; Valeri A Makarov
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 1.758

3.  Adaptive Optimization of Visual Sensitivity.

Authors:  Sergei Gepshtein; Thomas D Albright
Journal:  J Indian Inst Sci       Date:  2017-11-25

4.  What makes you think you are conscious? An agnosticist manifesto.

Authors:  Cees van Leeuwen
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 3.169

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.