Literature DB >> 23424015

Factors influencing quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy.

Ronald V Romero1, Sanjiv Mahadeva.   

Abstract

Recent technological advances in colonoscopy have led to improvements in both image enhancement and procedural performance. However, the utility of these technological advancements remain dependent on the quality of bowel preparation during colonoscopy. Poor bowel preparation has been shown to be associated with lower quality indicators of colonoscopy performance, such as reduced cecal intubation rates, increased patient discomfort and lower adenoma detection. The most popular bowel preparation regimes currently used are based on either Polyethylene glycol-electrolyte, a non-absorbable solution, or aqueous sodium phosphate, a low-volume hyperosmotic solution. Statements from various international societies and several reviews have suggested that the efficacy of bowel preparation regimes based on both purgatives are similar, although patients' compliance with these regimes may differ somewhat. Many studies have now shown that factors other than the type of bowel preparation regime used, can influence the quality of bowel preparation among adult patients undergoing colonoscopy. These factors can be broadly categorized as either patient-related or procedure-related. Studies from both Asia and the West have identified patient-related factors such as an increased age, male gender, presence of co-morbidity and socio-economic status of patients to be associated with poor bowel preparation among adults undergoing routine out-patient colonoscopy. Additionally, procedure-related factors such as adherence to bowel preparation instructions, timing of bowel purgative administration and appointment waiting times for colonoscopy are recognized to influence the quality of colon cleansing. Knowledge of these factors should aid clinicians in modifying bowel preparation regimes accordingly, such that the quality of colonoscopy performance and delivery of service to patients can be optimised.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bowel preparation; Colonoscopy; Quality; Risk factors

Year:  2013        PMID: 23424015      PMCID: PMC3574611          DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v5.i2.39

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc


  79 in total

1.  A life threatening complication after ingestion of sodium phosphate bowel preparation.

Authors:  Y Mun Woo; Susan Crail; Graham Curry; Colin C Geddes
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-09-16

2.  Residue-free sodium phosphate tablets (OsmoPrep) versus Visicol for colon cleansing: a randomized, investigator-blinded trial.

Authors:  Lawrence Wruble; Michael Demicco; Jeffrey Medoff; Alan Safdi; Jeffrey Bernstein; Douglas Dalke; Martin Rose; Robyn G Karlstadt; Nancy Ettinger; Bing Zhang
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2006-12-14       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  Predictors of inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy.

Authors:  R M Ness; R Manam; H Hoen; N Chalasani
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  Inpatient vs. outpatient bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery.

Authors:  E C Lee; P L Roberts; R Taranto; D J Schoetz; J J Murray; J A Coller
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Comparison of reduced volume versus four-liter electrolyte lavage solutions for colon cleansing.

Authors:  Tim S Ker
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 0.688

6.  The timing of bowel preparation before colonoscopy determines the quality of cleansing, and is a significant factor contributing to the detection of flat lesions: a randomized study.

Authors:  Adolfo Parra-Blanco; David Nicolas-Perez; Antonio Gimeno-Garcia; Begona Grosso; Alejandro Jimenez; Juan Ortega; Enrique Quintero
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-10-14       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Decreased efficacy of polyethylene glycol lavage solution (golytely) in the preparation of diabetic patients for outpatient colonoscopy: a prospective and blinded study.

Authors:  C Taylor; M L Schubert
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study.

Authors:  Florian Froehlich; Vincent Wietlisbach; Jean-Jacques Gonvers; Bernard Burnand; John-Paul Vader
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  Bisacodyl reduces the volume of polyethylene glycol solution required for bowel preparation.

Authors:  W J Adams; A P Meagher; D Z Lubowski; D W King
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.585

10.  Appointment waiting times and education level influence the quality of bowel preparation in adult patients undergoing colonoscopy.

Authors:  Wah-Kheong Chan; Arjunan Saravanan; Jeeta Manikam; Khean-Lee Goh; Sanjiv Mahadeva
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 3.067

View more
  22 in total

Review 1.  Which Patient-Related Factors Determine Optimal Bowel Preparation?

Authors:  Myriam Martel; Charles Ménard; Sophie Restellini; Omar Kherad; Majid Almadi; Maïté Bouchard; Alan N Barkun
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-12

2.  Many factors affecting the quality of bowel preparation need to be discussed when comparing different regimes.

Authors:  Aslam Syed; Tuyyab Hassan; Annette Kyprianou
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  A delayed onset of bowel activity after the start of conventional polyethylene glycol predicts inadequate colon cleansing before colonoscopy: A prospective observational study.

Authors:  Vasilios Papastergiou; Stelios Papasavvas; Nicoletta Mathou; Athanasios Giannakopoulos; Aikaterini Evgenidi; John A Karagiannis; Konstantina D Paraskeva
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 4.623

4.  Split-dose vs same-day reduced-volume polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution for morning colonoscopy.

Authors:  Wah-Kheong Chan; Najib Azmi; Sanjiv Mahadeva; Khean-Lee Goh
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Predictive factors of inadequate bowel preparation for elective colonoscopy.

Authors:  Amir Sadeghi; Mohsen Rajabnia; Mohammad Bagheri; Shaghayegh Jamshidizadeh; Samane Saberi; Paria Shahnazi; Leila Pasharavesh; Mohamad Amin Pourhoseingholi; Mona Mirzaei; Hamid Asadzadeh Aghdaei; Mohammad Reza Zali
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench       Date:  2022

Review 6.  Endoscopy in the Elderly: a Cautionary Approach, When to Stop.

Authors:  Rita Abdelmessih; Christopher D Packey; Garrett Lawlor
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-09

Review 7.  Interval Colorectal Cancer After Colonoscopy: Exploring Explanations and Solutions.

Authors:  Jeffrey Adler; Douglas J Robertson
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  Low-residue breakfast during the preparation for colonoscopy using a polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution: a randomised non-inferiority trial.

Authors:  Jennifer A Flemming; Jordan Green; Andrea Melicharkova; Stephen Vanner; Lawrence Hookey
Journal:  BMJ Open Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-05-28

9.  Safety and efficacy of sodium picosulfate, magnesium oxide, and citric acid bowel preparation in patients with baseline renal impairment or diabetes: subanalysis of a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Gautam N Mankaney; Masakazu Ando; David N Dahdal; Carol A Burke
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 4.409

Review 10.  What Influences the Quality of Prevention Colonoscopy?

Authors:  Wolfgang Schmidt-Tänzer; Axel Eickhoff
Journal:  Viszeralmedizin       Date:  2014-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.