Literature DB >> 17173912

Residue-free sodium phosphate tablets (OsmoPrep) versus Visicol for colon cleansing: a randomized, investigator-blinded trial.

Lawrence Wruble1, Michael Demicco, Jeffrey Medoff, Alan Safdi, Jeffrey Bernstein, Douglas Dalke, Martin Rose, Robyn G Karlstadt, Nancy Ettinger, Bing Zhang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The bowel purgative Visicol contains microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) residue, which may impair full visibility during a colonoscopy. An MCC residue-free sodium phosphate (RF-NaP; OsmoPrep) tablet was developed.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate appropriate RF-NaP dosing.
DESIGN: Phase 2, randomized, investigator-blinded study.
SETTING: Six research centers in the United States. PATIENTS AND
INTERVENTIONS: Patients undergoing a colonoscopy received Visicol (n = 34) or 1 of 6 RF-NaP regimens administered as either split (S) dosing (the evening before and the day of colonoscopy) or evening-only (E) dosing. Dosing regimens for RF-NaP were 40 tablets S, 3 every 15 minutes (n = 33); 40 tablets S, 4 every 15 minutes (n = 34); 32 tablets E, 4 every 15 minutes (n = 34); 32 tablets S, 4 every 15 minutes (n = 36); 28 tablets E, 4 every 15 minutes (n = 34); 28 tablets S, 4 every 15 minutes (n = 34). Visicol was administered as 40 tablets S, 3 every 15 minutes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Overall colon cleansing (OCC) was assessed by a physician questionnaire (4-point scale, based on colonic contents). An OCC rating of "excellent" or "good" was considered a response. Safety measures were also monitored.
RESULTS: Split dosing with RF-NaP was associated with high OCC and achieved response rates of 90%, 97%, and 100% for 28, 32, and 40 tablets, respectively, compared with 86% for Visicol. In addition, RF-NaP evening-only regimen response rates were 90% (32 tablets) and 72% (28 tablets). Transient shifts in electrolyte levels were reduced, and GI adverse events were less common with lower RF-NaP dose regimens.
CONCLUSIONS: Administration of RF-NaP retains the benefits of a tablet purgative but eliminates MCC issues. Split dosing and 32-tablet evening-only dosing of RF-NaP tablets were efficacious and well tolerated, and split dosing of RF-NaP tablets is recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17173912     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2006.07.047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  8 in total

1.  Polyethylene glycol vs. sodium phosphate for bowel preparation: a treatment arm meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Ravi Juluri; George Eckert; Thomas F Imperiale
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 3.067

2.  Prospective, controlled assessment of the impact of formal evidence-based medicine teaching workshop on ability to appraise the medical literature.

Authors:  G C Harewood; L M Hendrick
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 1.568

3.  Randomized controlled trial of sodium phosphate tablets vs polyethylene glycol solution for colonoscopy bowel cleansing.

Authors:  Yoon Suk Jung; Chang Kyun Lee; Hyo Jong Kim; Chang Soo Eun; Dong Soo Han; Dong Il Park
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Bowel preparation for colonoscopy using standard vs reduced doses of sodium phosphate: A single-blind randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Tatsuya Koshitani; Mayumi Kawada; Toshikazu Yoshikawa
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-08-16

5.  Comparison of split-dosing vs non-split (morning) dosing regimen for assessment of quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Hardik Shah; Devendra Desai; Hrishikesh Samant; Sandeep Davavala; Anand Joshi; Tarun Gupta; Philip Abraham
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-12-16

6.  Factors influencing quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Ronald V Romero; Sanjiv Mahadeva
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2013-02-16

7.  Real-life conditions of use of sodium phosphate tablets for colon cleansing before colonoscopy.

Authors:  Hervé Hagège; René Laugier; Stéphane Nahon; Pierre Coulom; Corinne Isnard-Bagnis; Annaïck Albert-Marty
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2015-05-05

8.  Polyethylene Glycol (PEG)-Induced Anaphylactic Reaction During Bowel Preparation.

Authors:  David Gachoka
Journal:  ACG Case Rep J       Date:  2015-07-09
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.