Literature DB >> 11419832

Predictors of inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy.

R M Ness1, R Manam, H Hoen, N Chalasani.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Inadequate preparation of the bowel for colonoscopy can result in both missed pathological lesions and cancelled procedures. We looked prospectively at the quality of colonic preparation and evaluated potential associations between specific patient characteristics and inadequate colonic preparation.
METHODS: Data were gathered on consecutive patients presenting for colonoscopy who received either a polyethylene glycol lavage or oral sodium phosphate bowel preparation. Patient demographic and medical history information was gathered before scheduled colonoscopy. The endoscopist evaluated the preparation quality during the procedure. Complete data were gathered on 649 of 714 eligible patients (90.8%). Possible predictors of inadequate colonic preparation were analyzed using univariate statistics and multivariate logistic regression models.
RESULTS: An inadequate colonic preparation was reported in 21.7% of observed colonoscopies. Only 18% of patients with an inadequate colonic preparation reported a failure to adequately follow preparation instructions. A later colonoscopy starting time, a reported failure to follow preparation instructions, inpatient status, a procedural indication of constipation, taking tricyclic antidepressants, male gender, and a history of cirrhosis, stroke or dementia were all independent predictors of an inadequate colon preparation (all p < 0.05). A procedural indication of previous polypectomy was a negative predictor of inadequate colonic preparation (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Several patient characteristics were significantly associated with colonic preparation quality independent of preparation type, compliance with preparation instructions, and procedure starting time. This information may help to identify patients at an increased risk for inadequate colonic preparation for whom alternative preparation protocols would be appropriate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11419832     DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.03874.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  144 in total

1.  Assessing bowel preparation quality using the mean number of adenomas per colonoscopy.

Authors:  Grace Clarke Hillyer; Benjamin Lebwohl; Richard M Rosenberg; Alfred I Neugut; Randi Wolf; Corey H Basch; Jennie Mata; Edwin Hernandez; Douglas A Corley; Steven Shea; Charles E Basch
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 4.409

2.  Update on preparation for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Stephen W Landreneau; Jack A Di Palma
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2010-10

Review 3.  Which Patient-Related Factors Determine Optimal Bowel Preparation?

Authors:  Myriam Martel; Charles Ménard; Sophie Restellini; Omar Kherad; Majid Almadi; Maïté Bouchard; Alan N Barkun
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-12

4.  Effect of a patient navigator program on the volume and quality of colonoscopy.

Authors:  Benjamin Lebwohl; Alfred I Neugut; Eliezer Stavsky; Sonia Villegas; Corinne Meli; Orlando Rodriguez; Carmen Franco; Marian S Krauskopf; Richard Rosenberg
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.062

5.  A consensus document on bowel preparation before colonoscopy: prepared by a task force from the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS), the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE), and the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES).

Authors:  Steven D Wexner; David E Beck; Todd H Baron; Robert D Fanelli; Neil Hyman; Bo Shen; Kevin E Wasco
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-06-08       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Comparative study of two bowel preparation regimens for colonoscopy: senna tablets vs sodium phosphate solution.

Authors:  Savit Kositchaiwat; Weerapat Suwanthanmma; Ronnarat Suvikapakornkul; Vaewvadee Tiewthanom; Prisna Rerkpatanakit; Chaowalitr Tinkornrusmee
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-09-14       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Predictors of suboptimal bowel preparation in asymptomatic patients undergoing average-risk screening colonoscopy.

Authors:  Shail M Govani; Eric E Elliott; Stacy B Menees; Stephanie L Judd; Sameer D Saini; Constantinos P Anastassiades; Annette L Urganus; Suzanna J Boyce; Philip S Schoenfeld
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2016-09-16

8.  Video on Diet Before Outpatient Colonoscopy Does Not Improve Quality of Bowel Preparation: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Sean C Rice; Tina Higginbotham; Melanie J Dean; James C Slaughter; Patrick S Yachimski; Keith L Obstein
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 10.864

9.  Adenoma detection in excellent versus good bowel preparation for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Danielle M Tholey; Corbett E Shelton; Gloria Francis; Archana Anantharaman; Robert A Frankel; Paurush Shah; Amy Coan; Sarah E Hegarty; Benjamin E Leiby; David M Kastenberg
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.062

10.  Risk factors for inadequate colonoscopy bowel preparations in African Americans and whites at an urban medical center.

Authors:  Anoop Appannagari; Shikha Mangla; Chuanhong Liao; K Gautham Reddy; Sonia S Kupfer
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 0.954

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.