Literature DB >> 20962223

The neural fate of task-irrelevant features in object-based processing.

Yaoda Xu1.   

Abstract

Objects are one of the most fundamental units in visual attentional selection and information processing. Studies have shown that, during object-based processing, all features of an attended object may be encoded together, even when these features are task irrelevant. Some recent studies, however, have failed to find this effect. What determines when object-based processing may or may not occur? In three experiments, observers were asked to encode object colors and the processing of task-irrelevant object shapes was evaluated by measuring functional magnetic resonance imaging responses from a brain area involved in shape representation. Whereas object-based task-irrelevant shape processing was present at low color-encoding load, it was attenuated or even suppressed at high color-encoding load. Moreover, such object-based processing was short-lived and was not sustained over a long delay period. Object-based processing for task-irrelevant features of attended objects thus does exist, as reported previously; but it is transient and its magnitude is determined by the encoding demand of the task-relevant feature.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20962223      PMCID: PMC6634783          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3011-10.2010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  42 in total

1.  fMRI evidence for objects as the units of attentional selection.

Authors:  K M O'Craven; P E Downing; N Kanwisher
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-10-07       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Cortical regions involved in perceiving object shape.

Authors:  Z Kourtzi; N Kanwisher
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-05-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Differential processing of objects under various viewing conditions in the human lateral occipital complex.

Authors:  K Grill-Spector; T Kushnir; S Edelman; G Avidan; Y Itzchak; R Malach
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Storage of features, conjunctions and objects in visual working memory.

Authors:  E K Vogel; G F Woodman; S J Luck
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 5.  Objects and attention: the state of the art.

Authors:  B J Scholl
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2001-06

Review 6.  High-level scene perception.

Authors:  J M Henderson; A Hollingworth
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 24.137

7.  Competitive mechanisms subserve attention in macaque areas V2 and V4.

Authors:  J H Reynolds; L Chelazzi; R Desimone
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-03-01       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Perceptual load and visuocortical processing: event-related potentials reveal sensory-level selection.

Authors:  T C Handy; M Soltani; G R Mangun
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2001-05

9.  The magical number 4 in short-term memory: a reconsideration of mental storage capacity.

Authors:  N Cowan
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 12.579

10.  The role of working memory in visual selective attention.

Authors:  J W de Fockert; G Rees; C D Frith; N Lavie
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-03-02       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  38 in total

1.  Does high memory load kick task-irrelevant information out of visual working memory?

Authors:  Jun Yin; Jifan Zhou; Haokui Xu; Junying Liang; Zaifeng Gao; Mowei Shen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-04

2.  Feature-based and spatial attentional selection in visual working memory.

Authors:  Anna Heuer; Anna Schubö
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-05

3.  Redundancy gains in retinotopic cortex.

Authors:  Won Mok Shim; Yuhong V Jiang; Nancy Kanwisher
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Does attribute amnesia occur with the presentation of complex, meaningful stimuli? The answer is, "it depends".

Authors:  Hui Chen; Jiahan Yu; Yingtao Fu; Ping Zhu; Wei Li; Jifan Zhou; Mowei Shen
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-08

5.  The role of top-down suppression in mitigating the disruptive effects of task-irrelevant feature changes in visual working memory.

Authors:  Andrea Bocincova; Amanda E van Lamsweerde; Jeffrey S Johnson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-11

6.  Task-specific, dimension-based attentional shaping of motion processing in monkey area MT.

Authors:  Bastian Schledde; F Orlando Galashan; Magdalena Przybyla; Andreas K Kreiter; Detlef Wegener
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Differential brain mechanisms for processing distracting information in task-relevant and -irrelevant dimensions in visual search.

Authors:  Ping Wei; Hongbo Yu; Hermann J Müller; Stefan Pollmann; Xiaolin Zhou
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Obligatory encoding of task-irrelevant features depletes working memory resources.

Authors:  Louise Marshall; Paul M Bays
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  The Impact of Density and Ratio on Object-Ensemble Representation in Human Anterior-Medial Ventral Visual Cortex.

Authors:  Jonathan S Cant; Yaoda Xu
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Feature-Selective Attentional Modulations in Human Frontoparietal Cortex.

Authors:  Edward F Ester; David W Sutterer; John T Serences; Edward Awh
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.