Literature DB >> 2341992

Neural coding in the chick cochlear nucleus.

M E Warchol1, P Dallos.   

Abstract

Physiological recordings were made from single units in the two divisions of the chick cochlear nucleus-nucleus angularis (NA) and nucleus magnocellularis (NM). Sound evoked responses were obtained in an effort to quantify functional differences between the two nuclei. In particular, it was of interest to determine if nucleus angularis and magnocellularis code for separate features of sound stimuli, such as temporal and intensity information. The principal findings are: 1. Spontaneous activity patterns in the two nuclei are very different. Neurons in nucleus angularis tend to have low spontaneous discharge rates while magnocellular units have high levels of spontaneous firing. 2. Frequency tuning curves recorded in both nuclei are similar in form, although the best thresholds of NA units are about 10 dB more sensitive than their NM counterparts across the entire frequency range. A wide spread of neural thresholds is evident in both NA and NM. 3. Large driven increases in discharge rate are seen in both NA and NM. Rate intensity functions from NM units are all monotonic, while a substantial percentage (22%) of NA units respond to increased sound level in a nonmonotonic fashion. 4. Most NA units with characteristic frequencies (CF) above 1000 Hz respond to sound stimuli at CF as 'choppers', while units with CF's below 1000 Hz are 'primary-like'. Several 'onset' units are also seen in NA. In contrast, all NM units show 'primary-like' response. 5. Units in both nuclei with CF's below 1000 Hz show strong neural phase-locking to stimuli at their CF. Above 1000 Hz, few NA units are phase-locked, while phase-locking in NM extends to 2000 Hz. 6. These results are discussed with reference to the hypothesis that NM initiates a neural pathway which codes temporal information while NA is involved primarily with intensity coding, similar in principle to the segregation of function seen in the cochlear nucleus of the barn owl (Sullivan and Konishi 1984).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2341992     DOI: 10.1007/bf00240021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A            Impact factor:   1.836


  28 in total

1.  Responses to tones and noise of single cells in dorsal cochlear nucleus of unanesthetized cats.

Authors:  E D Young; W E Brownell
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  A place theory of sound localization.

Authors:  L A JEFFRESS
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1948-02

3.  Neural response to very low-frequency sound in the avian cochlear nucleus.

Authors:  M E Warchol; P Dallos
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Development of absolute thresholds in chickens.

Authors:  L Gray; E W Rubel
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Synaptic responses and electrical properties of cells in brain slices of the mouse anteroventral cochlear nucleus.

Authors:  D Oertel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Time and intensity cues are processed independently in the auditory system of the owl.

Authors:  T Takahashi; A Moiseff; M Konishi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Neural map of interaural phase difference in the owl's brainstem.

Authors:  W E Sullivan; M Konishi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Organization and development of brain stem auditory nuclei of the chicken: tonotopic organization of n. magnocellularis and n. laminaris.

Authors:  E W Rubel; T N Parks
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1975-12-15       Impact factor: 3.215

9.  Classification of response patterns in cochlear nucleus of barn owl: correlation with functional response properties.

Authors:  W E Sullivan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Axonal delay lines for time measurement in the owl's brainstem.

Authors:  C E Carr; M Konishi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  70 in total

1.  GABAergic inhibition in nucleus magnocellularis: implications for phase locking in the avian auditory brainstem.

Authors:  P Monsivais; L Yang; E W Rubel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-04-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Coding of sound pressure level in the barn owl's auditory nerve.

Authors:  C Köppl; G Yates
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-11-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  The superior olivary nucleus and its influence on nucleus laminaris: a source of inhibitory feedback for coincidence detection in the avian auditory brainstem.

Authors:  L Yang; P Monsivais; E W Rubel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-03-15       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Maturation of synaptic transmission at end-bulb synapses of the cochlear nucleus.

Authors:  S Brenowitz; L O Trussell
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-12-01       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Mixed excitatory and inhibitory GABA-mediated transmission in chick cochlear nucleus.

Authors:  T Lu; L O Trussell
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2001-08-15       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Computational diversity in the cochlear nucleus angularis of the barn owl.

Authors:  Christine Köppl; Catherine E Carr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-12-27       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Modeling coincidence detection in nucleus laminaris.

Authors:  Victor Grau-Serrat; Catherine E Carr; Jonathan Z Simon
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2003-11-28       Impact factor: 2.086

8.  Target-specific regulation of presynaptic release properties at auditory nerve terminals in the avian cochlear nucleus.

Authors:  J Ahn; K M MacLeod
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  A role for short-term synaptic facilitation and depression in the processing of intensity information in the auditory brain stem.

Authors:  K M MacLeod; T K Horiuchi; C E Carr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-01-24       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Developmental changes in membrane excitability and morphology of neurons in the nucleus angularis of the chicken.

Authors:  Iwao Fukui; Harunori Ohmori
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2003-02-07       Impact factor: 5.182

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.