Literature DB >> 1255224

Responses to tones and noise of single cells in dorsal cochlear nucleus of unanesthetized cats.

E D Young, W E Brownell.   

Abstract

1. Single-unit responses in the dorsal cochlear nucleus of unanesthetized, decerebrate cats have been divided into two categoreis. These have been differentiated on the basis of responses to best-frequency tones. Type IV units responded to best-frequency tones with excitation from threshold to about 20 or 30 dB above threshold; at higher levels, their response was inhibitory. In a few cases, the excitatory area near threshold was not seen and in a few others, the response became excitatory again at high levels. Type IV units could be divided into two groups based on the length of time that inhibition was maintained in response to long tones. Type IV units are not seen in anesthetized cats. 2. Type II/III units responded to best-frequency tones of all levels with excitation. Nonmonotonic rate versus level functions were seen in type II/III units, but they were of much less drastic character; the discharge rate of nonmonotonic type II/III units was still well above spontaneous rate for tones 50 dB above threshold. Type II/III units defined in this way were found to have, on the average, lower rates of spontaneous activity and higher thresholds than type IV units. 3. Type II/III units responded weakly to broad-band noise in comparison to auditory nerve fibers and many of them did not respond at all to noise. Type IV units, with best frequencies above 0.9 kHz, gave excitatory responses to noise. 4. The inhibitory response areas of type IV units could be divided into two areas: a central inhibitory area in the vicinity of best frequency where on- and off-discharges and afterdischarges were seen; and inhibitory side bands at higher and lower frequencies where simple inhibitory responses were seen. In four units, it was possible to show that the central inhibitory area was converted to an excitatory area after administration of an anesthetic dose of pentobarbital. 5. Most type II/III and type IV units could be excited or inhibited by stimuli in the contralateral ear. Broad-band noise was a more effective contralateral stimulus than tones at the ipsilateral best frequency. 6. On the basis of the properties of type II/III and type IV cells, it is suggested that type II/III responses are recorded from interneurons which provide a large share of the inhibitory imput to type IV cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1976        PMID: 1255224     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1976.39.2.282

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  79 in total

1.  Coding of sound envelopes by inhibitory rebound in neurons of the superior olivary complex in the unanesthetized rabbit.

Authors:  S Kuwada; R Batra
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-03-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Substrates of auditory frequency integration in a nucleus of the lateral lemniscus.

Authors:  A Yavuzoglu; B R Schofield; J J Wenstrup
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 3.590

3.  Dorsal cochlear nucleus response properties following acoustic trauma: response maps and spontaneous activity.

Authors:  Wei-Li Diana Ma; Eric D Young
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Effects of contralateral sound stimulation on unit activity of ventral cochlear nucleus neurons.

Authors:  S E Shore; C J Sumner; S C Bledsoe; J Lu
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-09-05       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  Multimodal inputs to the granule cell domain of the cochlear nucleus.

Authors:  David K Ryugo; Charles-André Haenggeli; John R Doucet
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-09-09       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Onset neurones in the anteroventral cochlear nucleus project to the dorsal cochlear nucleus.

Authors:  Robert H Arnott; Mark N Wallace; Trevor M Shackleton; Alan R Palmer
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2004-06

7.  Single-neuron recordings from unanesthetized mouse dorsal cochlear nucleus.

Authors:  Wei-Li Diana Ma; Stephan D Brenowitz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Preparation of an awake mouse for recording neural responses and injecting tracers.

Authors:  Michael A Muniak; Zachary M Mayko; David K Ryugo; Christine V Portfors
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 1.355

9.  Discharge patterns in the lateral superior olive of decerebrate cats.

Authors:  Nathaniel T Greene; Kevin A Davis
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Commissural neurons in the rat ventral cochlear nucleus.

Authors:  John R Doucet; Nicole M Lenihan; Bradford J May
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-01-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.