Literature DB >> 2600887

Neural response to very low-frequency sound in the avian cochlear nucleus.

M E Warchol1, P Dallos.   

Abstract

Recordings were made in the chick cochlear nucleus from neurons that are sensitive to very low frequency sound. The tuning, discharge rate response and phase-locking properties of these units are described in detail. The principal conclusions are: 1. Low frequency (LF) units respond to sound frequencies between 10-800 Hz. Best thresholds average 60 dB SPL, and are occasionally as low as 40 dB SPL. While behavioral thresholds in this frequency range are not available for the domestic chick, these values are in good agreement with the pigeon behavioral audiogram (Kreithen and Quine 1979). 2. About 60% of the unit population displays tuning curves resembling low-pass filter functions with corner frequencies between 50-250 Hz. The remaining units have broad band-pass tuning curves. Best frequencies range from 50-300 Hz. 3. Spontaneous discharge rate was analyzed quantitatively for LF units recorded from nucleus angularis. The distribution of spontaneous rates for LF units is similar to that seen from higher CF units (300-5000 Hz) found in the same nucleus. However, the spontaneous firing of LF units is considerably more regular than that of their higher CF counterparts. 4. Low frequency units with low spontaneous rates (SR's less than 40 spikes/s) show large driven rate increases and usually saturate by discharging once or twice per stimulus cycle. Higher SR units often show no driven rate increases. 5. All LF units show strong phase-locking at all excitatory stimulus frequencies. Vector strengths as high as 0.98 have been observed at moderate sound levels. 6. The preferred phase of discharge (relative to the sound stimulus) increases with stimulus frequency in a nearly linear manner. This is consistent with the LF units being stimulated by a traveling wave. The slope of these phase-frequency relationships provides an estimate of traveling wave delay. These delays average 7.2 ms, longer than those seen for higher CF auditory brainstem units. These observations suggest that the peripheral site of low frequency sensitivity is the very distal region of the basilar papilla, an area whose morphology differs significantly from the rest of the chick basilar papilla. 7. LF units are described whose response to sound is inhibitory at frequencies above 50 Hz.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2600887     DOI: 10.1007/bf00190213

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A            Impact factor:   1.836


  36 in total

1.  Transfer characteristics of first and second order lateral canal vestibular neurons in gerbil.

Authors:  L W Schneider; D J Anderson
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1976-08-06       Impact factor: 3.252

2.  Unusual discharge patterns of single fibers in the pigeon's auditory nerve.

Authors:  A N Temchin
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Two-tone inhibition in auditory-nerve fibers.

Authors:  M B Sachs; N Y Kiang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1968-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Low-frequency auditory characteristics: Species dependence.

Authors:  P Dallos
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1970-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Detection of atmospheric infrasound by homing pigeons.

Authors:  M L Yodlowski; M L Kreithen; W T Keeton
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1977-02-24       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Voltage- and ion-dependent conductances in solitary vertebrate hair cells.

Authors:  R S Lewis; A J Hudspeth
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1983 Aug 11-17       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Neurophysiological evidence for a traveling wave in the amphibian inner ear.

Authors:  C M Hillery; P M Narins
Journal:  Science       Date:  1984-09-07       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Neural map of interaural phase difference in the owl's brainstem.

Authors:  W E Sullivan; M Konishi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Anatomical and physiological evidence for auditory specialization in the mountain beaver (Aplodontia rufa).

Authors:  M M Merzenich; L Kitzes; L Aitkin
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1973-08-30       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  Physiology of peripheral neurons innervating otolith organs of the squirrel monkey. I. Response to static tilts and to long-duration centrifugal force.

Authors:  C Fernández; J M Goldberg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  7 in total

1.  Neural coding in the chick cochlear nucleus.

Authors:  M E Warchol; P Dallos
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Tonotopic Optimization for Temporal Processing in the Cochlear Nucleus.

Authors:  Stefan N Oline; Go Ashida; R Michael Burger
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Audiogram of the chicken (Gallus gallus domesticus) from 2 Hz to 9 kHz.

Authors:  Evan M Hill; Gimseong Koay; Rickye S Heffner; Henry E Heffner
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Expression of the Pax2 transcription factor is associated with vestibular phenotype in the avian inner ear.

Authors:  Mark E Warchol; Guy P Richardson
Journal:  Dev Neurobiol       Date:  2009 Feb 1-15       Impact factor: 3.964

5.  Hair cell force generation does not amplify or tune vibrations within the chicken basilar papilla.

Authors:  Anping Xia; Xiaofang Liu; Patrick D Raphael; Brian E Applegate; John S Oghalai
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 6.  Sophisticated Fowl: The Complex Behaviour and Cognitive Skills of Chickens and Red Junglefowl.

Authors:  Laura Garnham; Hanne Løvlie
Journal:  Behav Sci (Basel)       Date:  2018-01-17

7.  Diverse Intrinsic Properties Shape Functional Phenotype of Low-Frequency Neurons in the Auditory Brainstem.

Authors:  Hui Hong; Xiaoyu Wang; Ting Lu; Diego A R Zorio; Yuan Wang; Jason Tait Sanchez
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 5.505

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.