OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of a process whereby a faculty-resident committee annually audits outpatient record keeping and preventive care practices and provides feedback to resident physicians. DESIGN: Pre- and postfeedback audits with interventions and observations repeated over six consecutive academic years. SETTING: The adult primary care practice of housestaff in a university-affiliated hospital. SUBJECTS: All 139 physicians in an internal medicine residency program from 1981-82 through 1986-87, of whom 37 were present for three consecutive years. INTERVENTION: Each year, residents were given individualized, detailed, typewritten feedback based on audits of their outpatient records. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Each resident physician had a minimum of four (mean 5.2) outpatient records per year audited against standards for record-keeping practices and the provision of preventive care. Overall performance scores for each resident audit improved from a mean of 39.7 +/- 12.3 (SD) in 1981-82 to a mean of 58.5 +/- 14.1 (SD) in 1986-87 (possible range 0 to 100, observed range 9.4 to 86.6). The overall performance scores of individual residents, who received two cycles of feedback, improved an average of 11.5 (95% confidence limits 7.6, 15.3), from a mean of 48.4 +/- 11.4 (SD) during their first year of residency to 59.8 +/- 13.9 (SD) during their third year. General (primary care) and traditional-track residents improved at similar rates, although mean performance scores were consistently higher for general than for traditional-track residents. Analysis of variance revealed that all changes and differences were statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: An ongoing chart audit and feedback system can be associated with improvements both in the performance of individual residents and in the long-term performance of a residency program.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of a process whereby a faculty-resident committee annually audits outpatient record keeping and preventive care practices and provides feedback to resident physicians. DESIGN: Pre- and postfeedback audits with interventions and observations repeated over six consecutive academic years. SETTING: The adult primary care practice of housestaff in a university-affiliated hospital. SUBJECTS: All 139 physicians in an internal medicine residency program from 1981-82 through 1986-87, of whom 37 were present for three consecutive years. INTERVENTION: Each year, residents were given individualized, detailed, typewritten feedback based on audits of their outpatient records. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Each resident physician had a minimum of four (mean 5.2) outpatient records per year audited against standards for record-keeping practices and the provision of preventive care. Overall performance scores for each resident audit improved from a mean of 39.7 +/- 12.3 (SD) in 1981-82 to a mean of 58.5 +/- 14.1 (SD) in 1986-87 (possible range 0 to 100, observed range 9.4 to 86.6). The overall performance scores of individual residents, who received two cycles of feedback, improved an average of 11.5 (95% confidence limits 7.6, 15.3), from a mean of 48.4 +/- 11.4 (SD) during their first year of residency to 59.8 +/- 13.9 (SD) during their third year. General (primary care) and traditional-track residents improved at similar rates, although mean performance scores were consistently higher for general than for traditional-track residents. Analysis of variance revealed that all changes and differences were statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: An ongoing chart audit and feedback system can be associated with improvements both in the performance of individual residents and in the long-term performance of a residency program.
Authors: S E Bennett; J D Goodson; J E Izen; W T Branch; W C Clark; C J Hatem; R S Lawrence; T L Delbanco; A H Goroll Journal: Med Care Date: 1985-06 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: R H Brook; A Fink; J Kosecoff; L S Linn; W E Watson; A R Davies; V A Clark; C Kamberg; T L Delbanco Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 1987-09 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Lisa L Willett; Katri Palonen; Jeroan J Allison; Gustavo R Heudebert; Catarina I Kiefe; F Stanford Massie; Terry C Wall; Thomas K Houston Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: William J Curry; Eugene J Lengerich; Brenda C Kluhsman; Marie A Graybill; Jason Z Liao; Eric W Schaefer; Angela M Spleen; Mark B Dignan Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2011-05-23 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Katri P Palonen; Jeroan J Allison; Gustavo R Heudebert; Lisa L Willett; Catarina I Kiefe; Terry C Wall; Thomas K Houston Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2006-02-22 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Kris G Thomas; Matthew R Thomas; Robert J Stroebel; Furman S McDonald; Gregory J Hanson; James M Naessens; Todd R Huschka; Joseph C Kolars Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2007-11-01 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Christopher Hildebrand; Elizabeth Trowbridge; Mary A Roach; Anne Gravel Sullivan; Aimee Teo Broman; Bennett Vogelman Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2009-01-21 Impact factor: 5.128