Literature DB >> 17973175

Use of a registry-generated audit, feedback, and patient reminder intervention in an internal medicine resident clinic--a randomized trial.

Kris G Thomas1, Matthew R Thomas, Robert J Stroebel, Furman S McDonald, Gregory J Hanson, James M Naessens, Todd R Huschka, Joseph C Kolars.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Disease registries, audit and feedback, and clinical reminders have been reported to improve care processes.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of a registry-generated audit, feedback, and patient reminder intervention on diabetes care.
DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial conducted in a resident continuity clinic during the 2003-2004 academic year. PARTICIPANTS: Seventy-eight categorical Internal Medicine residents caring for 483 diabetic patients participated. Residents randomized to the intervention (n = 39) received instruction on diabetes registry use; quarterly performance audit, feedback, and written reports identifying patients needing care; and had letters sent quarterly to patients needing hemoglobin A1c or cholesterol testing. Residents randomized to the control group (n = 39) received usual clinic education. MEASUREMENTS: Hemoglobin A1c and lipid monitoring, and the achievement of intermediate clinical outcomes (hemoglobin A1c <7.0%, LDL cholesterol <100 mg/dL, and blood pressure <130/85 mmHg) were assessed.
RESULTS: Patients cared for by residents in the intervention group had higher adherence to guideline recommendations for hemoglobin A1c testing (61.5% vs 48.1%, p = .01) and LDL testing (75.8% vs 64.1%, p = .02). Intermediate clinical outcomes were not different between groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Use of a registry-generated audit, feedback, and patient reminder intervention in a resident continuity clinic modestly improved diabetes care processes, but did not influence intermediate clinical outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17973175      PMCID: PMC2219846          DOI: 10.1007/s11606-007-0431-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  18 in total

1.  Improving chronic illness care: translating evidence into action.

Authors:  E H Wagner; B T Austin; C Davis; M Hindmarsh; J Schaefer; A Bonomi
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  Comparing the efficacy of staff versus housestaff instruction in an intervention to improve hypertension management.

Authors:  G D Denton; J Smith; J Faust; E Holmboe
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 6.893

3.  Effectiveness of report cards based on chart audits of residents' adherence to practice guidelines on practice performance: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jennifer R Kogan; Eileen E Reynolds; Judy A Shea
Journal:  Teach Learn Med       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.414

4.  The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States.

Authors:  Elizabeth A McGlynn; Steven M Asch; John Adams; Joan Keesey; Jennifer Hicks; Alison DeCristofaro; Eve A Kerr
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-06-26       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes.

Authors:  G Jamtvedt; J M Young; D T Kristoffersen; M A Thomson O'Brien; A D Oxman
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2003

6.  Improving residents' compliance with standards of ambulatory care: results from the VA Cooperative Study on Computerized Reminders.

Authors:  J G Demakis; C Beauchamp; W L Cull; R Denwood; S A Eisen; R Lofgren; K Nichol; J Woolliscroft; W G Henderson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-09-20       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Improving patient care outcomes by teaching quality improvement to medical students in community-based practices.

Authors:  Bruce E Gould; Michael R Grey; Charles G Huntington; Cynthia Gruman; Jonathan H Rosen; Eileen Storey; Lynn Abrahamson; Ann Marie Conaty; Leslie Curry; Michelle Ferreira; Karen L Harrington; Deborah Paturzo; Thomas J Van Hoof
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 6.893

8.  Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness: the chronic care model, Part 2.

Authors:  Thomas Bodenheimer; Edward H Wagner; Kevin Grumbach
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-10-16       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Web-based proactive system to improve breast cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Rajeev Chaudhry; Sidna M Scheitel; Erin K McMurtry; Dorinda J Leutink; Rosa L Cabanela; James M Naessens; Ahmed S Rahman; Lynn A Davis; Robert J Stroebel
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2007-03-26

10.  A randomized trial of three diabetes registry implementation strategies in a community internal medicine practice.

Authors:  Robert J Stroebel; Sidna M Scheitel; John S Fitz; Ruth A Herman; James M Naessens; Christopher G Scott; David A Zill; Lisa Muller
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Improv       Date:  2002-08
View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  Computerized prompting and feedback of diabetes care: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Suzanne Austin Boren; Aaron M Puchbauer; Faustine Williams
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2009-07-01

2.  More extensive implementation of the chronic care model is associated with better lipid control in diabetes.

Authors:  Jacqueline R Halladay; Darren A DeWalt; Alison Wise; Bahjat Qaqish; Kristin Reiter; Shoou-Yih Lee; Ann Lefebvre; Kimberly Ward; C Madeline Mitchell; Katrina E Donahue
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.657

3.  Resident-initiated interventions to improve inpatient heart-failure management.

Authors:  James Oujiri; Abdul Hakeem; Quinn Pack; Robert Holland; David Meyers; Christopher Hildebrand; Alan Bridges; Mary A Roach; Bennett Vogelman
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 7.035

4.  Drug titration patterns and HbA 1c levels in type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  J Ross Maclean; R H Chapman; C P Ferrufino; G Krishnarajah
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Resident self-assessment and self-reflection: University of Wisconsin-Madison's Five-Year Study.

Authors:  Christopher Hildebrand; Elizabeth Trowbridge; Mary A Roach; Anne Gravel Sullivan; Aimee Teo Broman; Bennett Vogelman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Continuity Clinic Practice Feedback Curriculum for Residents: A Model for Ambulatory Education.

Authors:  Christine Haynes; Myrt Yamamoto; Cody Dashiell-Earp; Delani Gunawardena; Reshma Gupta; Wendy Simon
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2019-04

7.  Manually-generated reminders delivered on paper: effects on professional practice and patient outcomes.

Authors:  Tomas Pantoja; Jeremy M Grimshaw; Nathalie Colomer; Carla Castañon; Javiera Leniz Martelli
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-12-18

Review 8.  The impact of interventions on appointment and clinical outcomes for individuals with diabetes: a systematic review.

Authors:  Lynn Nuti; Ayten Turkcan; Mark A Lawley; Lingsong Zhang; Laura Sands; Sara McComb
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Ability to generate patient registries among practices with and without electronic health records.

Authors:  Adam Wright; Elizabeth A McGlinchey; Eric G Poon; Chelsea A Jenter; David W Bates; Steven R Simon
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2009-08-10       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 10.  A systematic review of the effects of residency training on patient outcomes.

Authors:  Renée M van der Leeuw; Kiki M J M H Lombarts; Onyebuchi A Arah; Maas Jan Heineman
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 8.775

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.