BACKGROUND: Disease registries, audit and feedback, and clinical reminders have been reported to improve care processes. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of a registry-generated audit, feedback, and patient reminder intervention on diabetes care. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial conducted in a resident continuity clinic during the 2003-2004 academic year. PARTICIPANTS: Seventy-eight categorical Internal Medicine residents caring for 483 diabetic patients participated. Residents randomized to the intervention (n = 39) received instruction on diabetes registry use; quarterly performance audit, feedback, and written reports identifying patients needing care; and had letters sent quarterly to patients needing hemoglobinA1c or cholesterol testing. Residents randomized to the control group (n = 39) received usual clinic education. MEASUREMENTS: Hemoglobin A1c and lipid monitoring, and the achievement of intermediate clinical outcomes (hemoglobin A1c <7.0%, LDL cholesterol <100 mg/dL, and blood pressure <130/85 mmHg) were assessed. RESULTS: Patients cared for by residents in the intervention group had higher adherence to guideline recommendations for hemoglobin A1c testing (61.5% vs 48.1%, p = .01) and LDL testing (75.8% vs 64.1%, p = .02). Intermediate clinical outcomes were not different between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Use of a registry-generated audit, feedback, and patient reminder intervention in a resident continuity clinic modestly improved diabetes care processes, but did not influence intermediate clinical outcomes.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Disease registries, audit and feedback, and clinical reminders have been reported to improve care processes. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of a registry-generated audit, feedback, and patient reminder intervention on diabetes care. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial conducted in a resident continuity clinic during the 2003-2004 academic year. PARTICIPANTS: Seventy-eight categorical Internal Medicine residents caring for 483 diabeticpatients participated. Residents randomized to the intervention (n = 39) received instruction on diabetes registry use; quarterly performance audit, feedback, and written reports identifying patients needing care; and had letters sent quarterly to patients needing hemoglobin A1c or cholesterol testing. Residents randomized to the control group (n = 39) received usual clinic education. MEASUREMENTS: Hemoglobin A1c and lipid monitoring, and the achievement of intermediate clinical outcomes (hemoglobin A1c <7.0%, LDL cholesterol <100 mg/dL, and blood pressure <130/85 mmHg) were assessed. RESULTS:Patients cared for by residents in the intervention group had higher adherence to guideline recommendations for hemoglobin A1c testing (61.5% vs 48.1%, p = .01) and LDL testing (75.8% vs 64.1%, p = .02). Intermediate clinical outcomes were not different between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Use of a registry-generated audit, feedback, and patient reminder intervention in a resident continuity clinic modestly improved diabetes care processes, but did not influence intermediate clinical outcomes.
Authors: Elizabeth A McGlynn; Steven M Asch; John Adams; Joan Keesey; Jennifer Hicks; Alison DeCristofaro; Eve A Kerr Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-06-26 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: J G Demakis; C Beauchamp; W L Cull; R Denwood; S A Eisen; R Lofgren; K Nichol; J Woolliscroft; W G Henderson Journal: JAMA Date: 2000-09-20 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Bruce E Gould; Michael R Grey; Charles G Huntington; Cynthia Gruman; Jonathan H Rosen; Eileen Storey; Lynn Abrahamson; Ann Marie Conaty; Leslie Curry; Michelle Ferreira; Karen L Harrington; Deborah Paturzo; Thomas J Van Hoof Journal: Acad Med Date: 2002-10 Impact factor: 6.893
Authors: Rajeev Chaudhry; Sidna M Scheitel; Erin K McMurtry; Dorinda J Leutink; Rosa L Cabanela; James M Naessens; Ahmed S Rahman; Lynn A Davis; Robert J Stroebel Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2007-03-26
Authors: Robert J Stroebel; Sidna M Scheitel; John S Fitz; Ruth A Herman; James M Naessens; Christopher G Scott; David A Zill; Lisa Muller Journal: Jt Comm J Qual Improv Date: 2002-08
Authors: Jacqueline R Halladay; Darren A DeWalt; Alison Wise; Bahjat Qaqish; Kristin Reiter; Shoou-Yih Lee; Ann Lefebvre; Kimberly Ward; C Madeline Mitchell; Katrina E Donahue Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Date: 2014 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.657
Authors: James Oujiri; Abdul Hakeem; Quinn Pack; Robert Holland; David Meyers; Christopher Hildebrand; Alan Bridges; Mary A Roach; Bennett Vogelman Journal: BMJ Qual Saf Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 7.035
Authors: Christopher Hildebrand; Elizabeth Trowbridge; Mary A Roach; Anne Gravel Sullivan; Aimee Teo Broman; Bennett Vogelman Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2009-01-21 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Lynn Nuti; Ayten Turkcan; Mark A Lawley; Lingsong Zhang; Laura Sands; Sara McComb Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2015-09-02 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Adam Wright; Elizabeth A McGlinchey; Eric G Poon; Chelsea A Jenter; David W Bates; Steven R Simon Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2009-08-10 Impact factor: 5.428