P Seizer1, V Bucher2, C Frische3, D Heinzmann2, M Gramlich2, I Müller2, A Henning2, M Hofbeck3, G Kerst3, M Gawaz2, J Schreieck2. 1. Medizinische Klinik III, Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Ottfried-Müller Str. 10, 72076, Tübingen, Germany. peter.seizer@med.uni-tuebingen.de. 2. Medizinische Klinik III, Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Ottfried-Müller Str. 10, 72076, Tübingen, Germany. 3. Kinderheilkunde II, Pädiatrische Kardiologie, Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Conventional catheter ablation of cardiac arrhythmias is associated with radiation risks for patients and laboratory personnel. Widespread use of zero-fluoroscopic catheter ablation in clinical routine is limited by safety concerns. This study investigated the feasibility of zero-fluoroscopy catheter ablation using a three-dimensional mapping system and optional catheter contact force technology for an all-comers collective. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study comprised 184 patients; 91 patients, including 29 pediatric patients, underwent a zero-fluoroscopic electrophysiology (EP) study using the EnSite NavX system with real-time visualization of all electrodes. These patients were matched to a control group, which was treated using fluoroscopy in the same period. Inclusion criteria were documented supraventricular tachycardia or a history of symptomatic paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia. Transseptal access, if necessary, was achieved under transesophageal echocardiographic guidance for ablation of left-sided arrhythmias. Radiofrequency (using optional contact force measurement) or a cryotechnique was used for ablation. RESULTS: We observed no major acute complications. There were no significant differences between the two groups in the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: Zero-fluoroscopic catheter ablation is generally feasible in right-sided cardiac arrhythmias. Safety concerns regarding left atrial substrates or children can be overcome with optional real-time contact force measurement.
BACKGROUND: Conventional catheter ablation of cardiac arrhythmias is associated with radiation risks for patients and laboratory personnel. Widespread use of zero-fluoroscopic catheter ablation in clinical routine is limited by safety concerns. This study investigated the feasibility of zero-fluoroscopy catheter ablation using a three-dimensional mapping system and optional catheter contact force technology for an all-comers collective. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study comprised 184 patients; 91 patients, including 29 pediatric patients, underwent a zero-fluoroscopic electrophysiology (EP) study using the EnSite NavX system with real-time visualization of all electrodes. These patients were matched to a control group, which was treated using fluoroscopy in the same period. Inclusion criteria were documented supraventricular tachycardia or a history of symptomatic paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia. Transseptal access, if necessary, was achieved under transesophageal echocardiographic guidance for ablation of left-sided arrhythmias. Radiofrequency (using optional contact force measurement) or a cryotechnique was used for ablation. RESULTS: We observed no major acute complications. There were no significant differences between the two groups in the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: Zero-fluoroscopic catheter ablation is generally feasible in right-sided cardiac arrhythmias. Safety concerns regarding left atrial substrates or children can be overcome with optional real-time contact force measurement.
Entities:
Keywords:
Arrhythmia; Catheter ablation; Contact force measurement; Fluoroscopy; Safety
Authors: Rosa Macías; Inés Uribe; Luis Tercedor; Juan Jiménez-Jáimez; Juan Jiménez; Teresa Barrio; Miguel Álvarez Journal: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol Date: 2014-03-13 Impact factor: 1.976
Authors: Juan M Fernández-Gómez; Pablo Moriña-Vázquez; Elena Del Rio Morales; José Venegas-Gamero; Rafael Barba-Pichardo; Manuel Herrera Carranza Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2014-03-10
Authors: Mark J Earley; Refai Showkathali; Maysaa Alzetani; Peter M Kistler; Dhiraj Gupta; Dominic J Abrams; Julie A Horrocks; Stuart J Harris; Simon C Sporton; Richard J Schilling Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2006-04-13 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: John D Ferguson; Adam Helms; J Michael Mangrum; Srijoy Mahapatra; Pamela Mason; Ken Bilchick; George McDaniel; David Wiggins; John P DiMarco Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2009-12
Authors: Gerhard Hindricks; Stefan Willems; Josef Kautzner; Christian De Chillou; Michael Wiedemann; Siep Schepel; Christopher Piorkowski; Tim Risius; Hans Kottkamp Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2009-07
Authors: Mark D McCauley; Nisarg Patel; Scott J Greenberg; Joanna E Molina-Razavi; Payam Safavi-Naeini; Mehdi Razavi Journal: Eur J Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2016