Literature DB >> 23418888

Attentional capture during visual search is attenuated by target predictability: evidence from the N2pc, Pd, and topographic segmentation.

Nicolas Burra1, Dirk Kerzel.   

Abstract

Attentional capture by salient distractors has been confirmed by the occurrence of an N2pc to the salient distractor. To clarify some failures to replicate this finding, we varied target predictability to induce different search modes. In the unpredictable target condition, the target shape varied randomly from trial to trial, favoring singleton detection mode. In the predictable target condition, the target shape remained the same in a block of trials, favoring feature search mode. With unpredictable targets, we observed an N2pc toward the salient color distractor, confirming attentional capture in singleton search mode. With predictable targets, there was no N2pc to the salient distractor, but a distractor positivity (Pd), suggesting distractor suppression. Also, differences emerged in the topographic segmentation of N2pc and Pd. Further, the amplitude of the N2pc toward the target was larger with predictable than with unpredictable targets.
Copyright © 2013 Society for Psychophysiological Research.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23418888     DOI: 10.1111/psyp.12019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  23 in total

1.  Spatially Guided Distractor Suppression during Visual Search.

Authors:  Tobias Feldmann-Wüstefeld; Marina Weinberger; Edward Awh
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Does feature intertrial priming guide attention? The jury is still out.

Authors:  Aniruddha Ramgir; Dominique Lamy
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-10-08

3.  On preventing attention capture: Is singleton suppression actually singleton suppression?

Authors:  Mei-Ching Lien; Eric Ruthruff; Christopher Hauck
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-09-24

4.  Search mode, not the attentional window, determines the magnitude of attentional capture.

Authors:  Dirk Kerzel; Stanislas Huynh Cong
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 2.157

5.  Does attentional suppression occur at the level of perception or decision-making? Evidence from Gaspelin et al.'s (2015) probe letter task.

Authors:  Dirk Kerzel; Olivier Renaud
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2022-09-12

Review 6.  The Role of Inhibition in Avoiding Distraction by Salient Stimuli.

Authors:  Nicholas Gaspelin; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Progress Toward Resolving the Attentional Capture Debate.

Authors:  Steven J Luck; Nicholas Gaspelin; Charles L Folk; Roger W Remington; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2020-12-01

8.  The impact of task relevance and degree of distraction on stimulus processing.

Authors:  Stefanie C Biehl; Ann-Christine Ehlis; Laura D Müller; Andrea Niklaus; Paul Pauli; Martin J Herrmann
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 3.288

9.  Varying expectancies and attention bias in phobic and non-phobic individuals.

Authors:  Tatjana Aue; Raphaël Guex; Léa A S Chauvigné; Hadas Okon-Singer
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  What pops out in positional priming of pop-out: insights from event-related EEG lateralizations.

Authors:  Ahu Gokce; Thomas Geyer; Kathrin Finke; Hermann J Müller; Thomas Töllner
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-07-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.