Literature DB >> 2341819

The effects of nodality on the formation of equivalence classes.

L Fields1, B J Adams, T Verhave, S Newman.   

Abstract

A four-member equivalence class (A----B----C----D) can be formed by training AB, BC, and CD. The nodal stimuli, B and C, mediate all of the derivative (transitive and equivalence) relations in the class. The derivative relations AC, CA, BD, and DB are separated by one node, whereas AD and DA are separated by two nodes. How do the number of nodes that separate the stimuli in a derivative relation influence the induction of stimulus control exerted by that relation? Seven college students learned two four-member classes made up of nonsense syllables. After training, all derivative relations were presented repeatedly without informative feedback. Stimulus control exerted by each derivative relation was assessed concurrently. For the 7 subjects, control exerted by the derivative relations increased gradually with repeated presentations. With 6 of the 7 subjects, the one-node relations exerted more control than the two-node relations during the process. However, the disparity between the one- and two-node relations decreased with repeated presentations. Eventually, all derivative relations exerted complete control. The control exerted by derivative relations during induction was inversely related to the number of nodes separating the terms in the derivative relations. These results demonstrate that nodal distance is a determinant of the relatedness of stimuli in equivalence classes. The findings are discussed in terms of remote association, semantic memory networks, and the study of transitive inference.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2341819      PMCID: PMC1322962          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1990.53-345

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  18 in total

1.  AN INQUIRY INTO THE DOCTRINE OF REMOTE ASSOCIATIONS.

Authors:  N J SLAMECKA
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1964-01       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  IN DEFENSE OF REMOTE ASSOCIATIONS.

Authors:  K M DALLETT
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1965-03       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  The structure of equivalence classes.

Authors:  L Fields; T Verhave
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Stimulus equivalence and transitive associations: A methodological analysis.

Authors:  L Fields; T Verhave; S Fath
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Nonhumans have not yet shown stimulus equivalence.

Authors:  S C Hayes
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Establishing auditory stimulus control over an eight-member equivalence class via conditional discrimination procedures.

Authors:  R R Saunders; J Wachter; J E Spradlin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Six-member stimulus classes generated by conditional-discrimination procedures.

Authors:  M Sidman; B Kirk; M Willson-Morris
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Reading and auditory-visual equivalences.

Authors:  M Sidman
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1971-03

9.  Conditional discrimination vs. matching to sample: an expansion of the testing paradigm.

Authors:  M Sidman; W Tailby
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Concepts, propositions, and schemata: what are the cognitive units?

Authors:  J R Anderson
Journal:  Nebr Symp Motiv       Date:  1980
View more
  45 in total

1.  A discrimination analysis of training-structure effects on stimulus equivalence outcomes.

Authors:  R R Saunders; G Green
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Speed contingencies, number of stimulus presentations, and the nodality effect in equivalence class formation.

Authors:  A A Imam
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Perceptual classes established with forced-choice primary generalization tests and transfer of function.

Authors:  K F Reeve; L Fields
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  The formation of linked perceptual classes.

Authors:  Lanny Fields; Priya Matneja; Antonios Varelas; James Belanich; Adrienne Fitzer; Kim Shamoun
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  The formation of a generalized categorization repertoire: effect of training with multiple domains, samples, and comparisons.

Authors:  Lanny Fields; Kenneth F Reeve; Priya Matneja; Antonios Varelas; James Belanich; Adrienne Fitzer; Kim Shamoun
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  The transformation of consequential functions in accordance with the relational frames of same and opposite.

Authors:  Robert Whelan; Dermot Barnes-Holmes
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Relational frame theory: A new paradigm for the analysis of social behavior.

Authors:  Bryan Roche; Yvonne Barnes-Holmes; Dermot Barnes-Holmes; Ian Stewart; Denis O'Hora
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2002

8.  A behavior analytic analogue of learning to use synonyms, syntax, and parts of speech.

Authors:  Philip N Chase; David W Ellenwood; Gregory Madden
Journal:  Anal Verbal Behav       Date:  2008

9.  Comments on Skinner's grammar.

Authors:  J H Mabry
Journal:  Anal Verbal Behav       Date:  1993

10.  The role of multiple-exemplar training and naming in establishing derived equivalence in an infant.

Authors:  Carmen Luciano; Inmaculada Gómez Becerra; Miguel Rodríguez Valverde
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.