Literature DB >> 3346622

Establishing auditory stimulus control over an eight-member equivalence class via conditional discrimination procedures.

R R Saunders1, J Wachter, J E Spradlin.   

Abstract

Two eight-member equivalence classes of visual stimuli were established during three phases of a training program. In Phase 1, two training arrangements were compared. In one, 3 subjects were taught on different trials to select from a single pair of comparison stimuli (A1, A2) in response to eight sample stimuli that were trained in pairs (B1, B2; C1, C2; D1, D2; E1, E2). In the second arrangement, subjects were taught to select from four pairs of comparisons (B1, B2; C1, C2; D3, D2; E2, E2) in response to two samples (A1, A2). Training with the single pair of comparison stimuli resulted in the development of equivalence relations (B1C1, B2C2, D1B1, D2B2, B1E1, B2E2, C1D1, C2D2, C1E1, C2E2, D1E1, D2E2, and their reciprocals) between the sample stimuli without direct training of these relations. In the other training arrangement, these relations among the comparison stimuli developed in the performance of 1 subject only. In Phase 2, three new pairs of stimuli (F1, F2; G1, G2; H1, H2) were substituted for three of the original pairs (B1, B2; C1, C2; D1, D2) and the training arrangements for the groups were reversed. Following training, the performances that showed equivalence relations on the probes in the first phase also showed equivalence relations in the second phase. If such relations did not develop in the first phase, they did not do so in the second phase. In Phase 3, relations between stimuli across the two previous phases (e.g., B1F1, B2F2, B1G1, B2H2, C1F1, etc.) were investigated. The 4 subjects whose performances showed the development of these relations were taught to select one stimulus from each class (E1 and E2) in response to a verbal label (I1 and I2) and then were tested to see if the verbal label controlled responding to the remaining members of the class (e.g., I1A1, I2A2, I1B1, I2B2, etc.). For 3 subjects, this generalized control occurred; for the 4th, generalization occurred only after verbal training with a second pair of visual stimuli (F1 and F2). In retests several months later, these auditory-visual relations were found to be intact or, if not, were recovered without direct training.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3346622      PMCID: PMC1338829          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1988.49-95

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  14 in total

1.  The development of derived stimulus relations through training in arbitrary-matching sequences.

Authors:  B Wetherby; G R Karlan; J E Spradlin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Stimulus equivalence and transitive associations: A methodological analysis.

Authors:  L Fields; T Verhave; S Fath
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Extending sequence-class membership with matching to sample.

Authors:  R Lazar
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Establishing conditional discriminations without direct training: stimulus classes and labels.

Authors:  J E Spradlin; M H Dixon
Journal:  Am J Ment Defic       Date:  1976-03

5.  Six-member stimulus classes generated by conditional-discrimination procedures.

Authors:  M Sidman; B Kirk; M Willson-Morris
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Acquisition of matching to sample via mediated transfer.

Authors:  M Sidman; O Cresson; M Willson-Morris
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-09       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Establishing a conditional discrimination without direct training: a study of transfer with retarded adolescents.

Authors:  J E Spradlin; V W Cotter; N Baxley
Journal:  Am J Ment Defic       Date:  1973-03

8.  Reading and auditory-visual equivalences.

Authors:  M Sidman
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1971-03

9.  Control of adolescents' arbitrary matching-to-sample by positive and negative stimulus relations.

Authors:  R Stromer; J G Osborne
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Conditional discrimination vs. matching to sample: an expansion of the testing paradigm.

Authors:  M Sidman; W Tailby
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  43 in total

1.  A discrimination analysis of training-structure effects on stimulus equivalence outcomes.

Authors:  R R Saunders; G Green
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Stability of functional equivalence and stimulus equivalence: effects of baseline reversals.

Authors:  Oliver Wirth; Philip N Chase
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Speed contingencies, number of stimulus presentations, and the nodality effect in equivalence class formation.

Authors:  A A Imam
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Equivalence class establishment, expansion, and modification in preschool children.

Authors:  R R Saunders; K M Drake; J E Spradlin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  The formation of linked perceptual classes.

Authors:  Lanny Fields; Priya Matneja; Antonios Varelas; James Belanich; Adrienne Fitzer; Kim Shamoun
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 6.  Equivalence relations in individuals with language limitations and mental retardation.

Authors:  Jennifer O'Donnell; Kathryn J Saunders
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Conditional discrimination in the intraverbal relation: a review and recommendations for future research.

Authors:  Judah B Axe
Journal:  Anal Verbal Behav       Date:  2008

8.  Sources cited most frequently in the experimental analysis of human behavior.

Authors:  T S Critchfield; W Buskist; B Saville; J Crockett; T Sherburne; K Keel
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2000

9.  An instance of spurious equivalence relations.

Authors:  G Stikeleather; M Sidman
Journal:  Anal Verbal Behav       Date:  1990

10.  An Analog Study of First Language Dominance and Interference over Second Language.

Authors:  Ramona Houmanfar; Linda J Hayes; Scott A Herbst
Journal:  Anal Verbal Behav       Date:  2005
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.