Literature DB >> 2341669

A comparison of maximum length and Legendre sequences for the derivation of brain-stem auditory-evoked responses at rapid rates of stimulation.

R Burkard1, Y Shi, K E Hecox.   

Abstract

Experiments were performed in which brain-stem auditory-evoked responses (BAERs) were elicited by two types of pseudorandom pulse trains: maximum length sequences (MLS) and Legendre sequences (LGS). In experiment 1, each pulse sequence was presented at 50 dB nHL with minimum pulse intervals varying from 1 to 10 ms. Wave V latency increased and wave V amplitude decreased with decreasing minimum pulse intervals, with no significant effect of the type of sequence (MLS vs LGS), and no significant interaction between sequence and minimum pulse interval in terms of wave V amplitude or latency. In a second experiment, the minimum pulse interval was held constant at 4 ms, while MLS and LGS levels were varied from 20 to 60 dB nHL. With increasing click intensity, there is a decrease in wave V latency and an increase in wave V amplitude. There was no significant effect of type of sequence (LGS vs MLS) or interaction between type of sequence and stimulus intensity for wave V amplitude or latency. Despite the obvious violation of the assumptions (linearity and stationarity) underlying the application of maximum length sequence analysis and Legendre sequence analysis, both techniques produced reliable responses remarkably similar in morphology to evoked responses obtained by conventional averaging. The results of these experiments support the possibility that analysis methods based on pseudorandom pulse sequences may prove more efficient in data collection and provide a more thorough description of the electrophysiologic behavior of the auditory system compared to conventional averaging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2341669     DOI: 10.1121/1.399413

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  9 in total

1.  The use of QSD (q-sequence deconvolution) to recover superposed, transient evoked-responses.

Authors:  Don L Jewett; Gideon Caplovitz; Bill Baird; Michael Trumpis; Marram P Olson; Linda J Larson-Prior
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Optimizing Auditory Brainstem Response Acquisition Using Interleaved Frequencies.

Authors:  Brad N Buran; Sean Elkins; J Beth Kempton; Edward V Porsov; John V Brigande; Stephen V David
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-07-09

3.  The effects of click rate on the auditory brainstem response of bottlenose dolphins.

Authors:  Robert F Burkard; James J Finneran; Jason Mulsow
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Pseudorandom binary sequence stimulation applied to the visual evoked response. Normative data and a comparative study with pattern and flash stimulation.

Authors:  A D Collins; B B Sawhney
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  Optimizing Parameters for Using the Parallel Auditory Brainstem Response to Quickly Estimate Hearing Thresholds.

Authors:  Melissa J Polonenko; Ross K Maddox
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.562

6.  Auditory Brainstem Responses to Continuous Natural Speech in Human Listeners.

Authors:  Ross K Maddox; Adrian K C Lee
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2018-02-09

7.  Sodium-activated potassium channels shape peripheral auditory function and activity of the primary auditory neurons in mice.

Authors:  Daniël O J Reijntjes; Jeong Han Lee; Seojin Park; Nick M A Schubert; Marcel van Tuinen; Sarath Vijayakumar; Timothy A Jones; Sherri M Jones; Michael Anne Gratton; Xiao-Ming Xia; Ebenezer N Yamoah; Sonja J Pyott
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Sodium-hydrogen exchanger 6 (NHE6) deficiency leads to hearing loss, via reduced endosomal signalling through the BDNF/Trk pathway.

Authors:  Krystsina Kucharava; Yves Brand; Giuseppe Albano; Marijana Sekulic-Jablanovic; Andrea Glutz; Xunde Xian; Joachim Herz; Daniel Bodmer; Daniel G Fuster; Vesna Petkovic
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Auditory neuropathy in a patient with hemochromatosis.

Authors:  Gary Rance; Donella Chisari
Journal:  J Otol       Date:  2016-10-22
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.