Literature DB >> 8334931

Pseudorandom binary sequence stimulation applied to the visual evoked response. Normative data and a comparative study with pattern and flash stimulation.

A D Collins1, B B Sawhney.   

Abstract

The investigation of patients who are unable to fixate the pattern visual stimulus generally requires the use of diffuse flash stimulation to elicit the visual evoked response. However, by comparison with pattern, flash stimulation has proved relatively insensitive in identifying lesions of the visual pathway. We investigated a more complex method of flash stimulation. A pseudorandom binary sequence has been used to generate the diffuse visual evoked response stimulus. The pseudorandom binary sequence, rather than producing a single flash, switches in a pseudorandom fashion between two levels of illumination. The result is a diffuse visual stimulus approximating band-limited white noise. The series is periodic, enabling signal averaging to be performed. By applying the methods of random signal analysis, the impulse or transient response of the visual pathway can be determined. Our normal pseudo-random binary sequence visual evoked response impulse function, derived from 29 normal subjects, had the morphologic characteristics of the conventional flash visual evoked response and a major positive component (P100), whose latency mean and standard deviation closely matched that of our normative pattern visual evoked response. However, the P100 amplitude standard deviation was significantly greater than that produced by conventional pattern and flash stimulation. We investigated 140 patients by means of pattern, flash and pseudorandom binary sequence stimulation. The pseudorandom binary sequence visual evoked response proved to be almost 12 times more effective than flash visual evoked response in detecting lesions of the visual system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8334931     DOI: 10.1007/bf01206214

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  9 in total

1.  On-line identification of sensory systems using pseudorandom binary noise perturbations.

Authors:  D P O'Leary; V Honrubia
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  A new method of cone electroretinography: the rapid random flash response.

Authors:  S J Fricker; J J Sanders
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol       Date:  1975-02

3.  Foveal versus peripheral retinal responses: a new analysis for early diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  P M Rossini; M Pirchio; D Sollazzo; C Caltagirone
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1979-11

4.  A comparison of maximum length and Legendre sequences for the derivation of brain-stem auditory-evoked responses at rapid rates of stimulation.

Authors:  R Burkard; Y Shi; K E Hecox
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Delayed visual evoked response in optic neuritis.

Authors:  A M Halliday; W I McDonald; J Mushin
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1972-05-06       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Visual evoked response in diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  A M Halliday; W I McDonald; J Mushin
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1973-12-15

7.  Steady-state and transient visual evoked potentials in clinical practice.

Authors:  G G Celesia
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 5.691

8.  Visually evoked potentials to pseudorandom binary sequence stimulation. Preliminary clinical trails.

Authors:  R Srebro; W W Wright
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1980-02

9.  Electrical injury of the eye.

Authors:  S M Al Rabiah; D B Archer; R Millar; A D Collins; W F Shepherd
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 2.031

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Characteristics of first and second order kernels of visually evoked potentials elicited by pseudorandom stimulation.

Authors:  Nobuyuki Nemoto; Keiko Momose; Motohiro Kiyosawa; Hiroshi Mori; Manabu Mochizuki
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  White noise analysis of a chromatic type horizontal cell in the Xenopus retina.

Authors:  S L Stone
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 4.086

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.