Literature DB >> 15546784

The use of QSD (q-sequence deconvolution) to recover superposed, transient evoked-responses.

Don L Jewett1, Gideon Caplovitz, Bill Baird, Michael Trumpis, Marram P Olson, Linda J Larson-Prior.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We describe q-sequence deconvolution (QSD), a new data acquisition/analysis method for evoked-responses that solves the problem of waveform distortion at high stimulus repetition-rates, due to response overlap. QSD can increase the sensitivity of clinically useful evoked-responses because it is well known that high stimulus repetition-rates are better for detecting pathophysiology.
METHODS: QSD is applicable to a variety of experimental conditions. Because some QSD-parameters must be chosen by the experimenter, the underlying principles and assumptions of the method are described in detail. The theoretical and mathematical bases of the QSD method are also described, including some equivalent computational formulations.
RESULTS: QSD was applied to recordings of the human auditory brainstem response (ABR) at stimulus repetition-rates that overlapped the responses. The transient ABR was recovered at all rates tested (highest 160/s), and showed systematic changes with stimulus repetition-rate within a single subject.
CONCLUSIONS: QSD offers a new method of recovering brain evoked-response activity having a duration longer than the time between stimuli. SIGNIFICANCE: The use of this new technique for analysis of evoked responses will permit examination of brain activation patterns across a broad range of stimulus repetition-rates, some never before studied. Such studies will improve the sensitivity of evoked-responses for the detection of brain pathophysiology. New measures of brain activity may be discovered using QSD. The method also permits the recovery of the transient brain waveforms that overlap to form 'steady-state' waveforms. An additional benefit of the QSD method is that repetition-rate can be isolated as a variable, independent of other stimulus characteristics, even if the response is a nonlinear function of rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15546784      PMCID: PMC1444882          DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2004.06.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  45 in total

1.  Developmental dependencies of the human brainstem auditory evoked response.

Authors:  K Hecox; R Burkard
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  Auditory brain stem response variability in infants.

Authors:  J E Stockard; J J Stockard; R W Coen
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1983 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Effects of stimulus repetition rate on the auditory brain stem responses (ABR).

Authors:  G Paludetti; M Maurizi; F Ottaviani
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1983-01

4.  Maximum length sequences -- a fast method for measuring brain-stem-evoked responses.

Authors:  U Eysholdt; C Schreiner
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  1982

5.  Brain stem auditory and visual evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  M Kjaer
Journal:  Acta Neurol Scand       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 3.209

6.  Brainstem auditory evoked response in the diagnosis of pediatric neurologic diseases.

Authors:  K E Hecox; B Cone; M E Blaw
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 9.910

7.  Contribution of changes in click rate and intensity on diagnosis of multiple sclerosis by brainstem auditory evoked potentials.

Authors:  J Elidan; H Sohmer; M Gafni; E Kahana
Journal:  Acta Neurol Scand       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 3.209

8.  Auditory brainstem response with high stimulus rates in normal and patient populations.

Authors:  I J Gerling; T Finitzo-Hieber
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1983 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.547

9.  Assessment of functional integrity of brain stem auditory pathways by stimulus stress.

Authors:  E Shanon; S Gold; M Z Himelfarb
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  1981

10.  Brainstem auditory evoked responses in spinocerebellar degeneration and Wilson disease.

Authors:  M Fujita; M Hosoki; M Miyazaki
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 10.422

View more
  9 in total

1.  Some thoughts on the interpretation of steady-state evoked potentials.

Authors:  Sven P Heinrich
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-01-26       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Disruption of the auditory response to a regular click train by a single, extra click.

Authors:  Bernd Lütkenhöner; Roy D Patterson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The effects of click rate on the auditory brainstem response of bottlenose dolphins.

Authors:  Robert F Burkard; James J Finneran; Jason Mulsow
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Human sensory-evoked responses differ coincident with either "fusion-memory" or "flash-memory", as shown by stimulus repetition-rate effects.

Authors:  Don L Jewett; Toryalai Hart; Linda J Larson-Prior; Bill Baird; Marram Olson; Michael Trumpis; Katherine Makayed; Payam Bavafa
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2006-02-23       Impact factor: 3.288

5.  New metric for optimizing Continuous Loop Averaging Deconvolution (CLAD) sequences under the 1/f noise model.

Authors:  Xian Peng; Han Yuan; Wufan Chen; Tao Wang; Lei Ding
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Continuous- and discrete-time stimulus sequences for high stimulus rate paradigm in evoked potential studies.

Authors:  Tao Wang; Jiang-hua Huang; Lin Lin; Chang'an A Zhan
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2013-03-31       Impact factor: 2.238

7.  Simulation on the Comparison of Steady-State Responses Synthesized by Transient Templates Based on Superposition Hypothesis.

Authors:  Xiao-dan Tan; Xue-fei Yu; Lin Lin; Tao Wang
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 2.238

8.  Habituation of Auditory Steady State Responses Evoked by Amplitude-Modulated Acoustic Signals in Rats.

Authors:  Pavel Prado-Gutierrez; Anisleidy Castro-Fariñas; Lisbet Morgado-Rodriguez; Ernesto Velarde-Reyes; Agustín D Martínez; Eduardo Martínez-Montes
Journal:  Audiol Res       Date:  2015-01-21

9.  Unfold: an integrated toolbox for overlap correction, non-linear modeling, and regression-based EEG analysis.

Authors:  Benedikt V Ehinger; Olaf Dimigen
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 2.984

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.