Literature DB >> 23401252

Group testing regression model estimation when case identification is a goal.

Boan Zhang1, Christopher R Bilder, Joshua M Tebbs.   

Abstract

Group testing is frequently used to reduce the costs of screening a large number of individuals for infectious diseases or other binary characteristics in small prevalence situations. In many applications, the goals include both identifying individuals as positive or negative and estimating the probability of positivity. The identification aspect leads to additional tests being performed, known as "retests", beyond those performed for initial groups of individuals. In this paper, we investigate how regression models can be fit to estimate the probability of positivity while also incorporating the extra information from these retests. We present simulation evidence showing that significant gains in efficiency occur by incorporating retesting information, and we further examine which testing protocols are the most efficient to use. Our investigations also demonstrate that some group testing protocols can actually lead to more efficient estimates than individual testing when diagnostic tests are imperfect. The proposed methods are applied retrospectively to chlamydia screening data from the Infertility Prevention Project. We demonstrate that significant cost savings could occur through the use of particular group testing protocols.
© 2013 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23401252      PMCID: PMC3841014          DOI: 10.1002/bimj.201200168

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biom J        ISSN: 0323-3847            Impact factor:   2.207


  19 in total

1.  Regression models for disease prevalence with diagnostic tests on pools of serum samples.

Authors:  S Vansteelandt; E Goetghebeur; T Verstraeten
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Using group testing to estimate a proportion, and to test the binomial model.

Authors:  C L Chen; W H Swallow
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  binGroup: A Package for Group Testing.

Authors:  Christopher R Bilder; Boan Zhang; Frank Schaarschmidt; Joshua M Tebbs
Journal:  R J       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 3.984

4.  Pooling in systems biology becomes smart.

Authors:  Nicolas Thierry-Mieg
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 28.547

5.  Optimality of group testing in the presence of misclassification.

Authors:  Aiyi Liu; Chunling Liu; Zhiwei Zhang; Paul S Albert
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2011-12-29       Impact factor: 2.445

6.  Pooled nucleic acid testing to detect antiretroviral treatment failure in Mexico.

Authors:  Myres W Tilghman; Don Diego Guerena; Alexei Licea; Josué Pérez-Santiago; Douglas D Richman; Susanne May; Davey M Smith
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 3.731

7.  The use of a square array scheme in blood testing.

Authors:  R M Phatarfod; A Sudbury
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1994-11-30       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Detection of acute HIV infections in an urban HIV counseling and testing population in the United States.

Authors:  Frances H Priddy; Christopher D Pilcher; Renee H Moore; Pradnya Tambe; Mahin N Park; Susan A Fiscus; Mark B Feinberg; Carlos del Rio
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 3.731

Review 9.  Introduction of Chlamydia trachomatis screening for young women in Germany.

Authors:  Monika Mund; Gabriele Sander; Peter Potthoff; Helga Schicht; Katja Matthias
Journal:  J Dtsch Dermatol Ges       Date:  2008-05-07       Impact factor: 5.584

10.  Assessment of arbovirus vector infection rates using variable size pooling.

Authors:  W Gu; R Lampman; R J Novak
Journal:  Med Vet Entomol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.739

View more
  9 in total

1.  Bayesian regression for group testing data.

Authors:  Christopher S McMahan; Joshua M Tebbs; Timothy E Hanson; Christopher R Bilder
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Estimating covariate-adjusted measures of diagnostic accuracy based on pooled biomarker assessments.

Authors:  Christopher S McMahan; Alexander C McLain; Colin M Gallagher; Enrique F Schisterman
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 2.207

3.  A general framework for the regression analysis of pooled biomarker assessments.

Authors:  Yan Liu; Christopher McMahan; Colin Gallagher
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Group testing regression models with dilution submodels.

Authors:  Md S Warasi; Christopher S McMahan; Joshua M Tebbs; Christopher R Bilder
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Estimating the prevalence of multiple diseases from two-stage hierarchical pooling.

Authors:  Md S Warasi; Joshua M Tebbs; Christopher S McMahan; Christopher R Bilder
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Generalized additive regression for group testing data.

Authors:  Yan Liu; Christopher S McMahan; Joshua M Tebbs; Colin M Gallagher; Christopher R Bilder
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 5.899

7.  Semiparametric isotonic regression modelling and estimation for group testing data.

Authors:  Ao Yuan; Jin Piao; Jing Ning; Jing Qin
Journal:  Can J Stat       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 0.875

8.  Nonparametric estimation of distributions and diagnostic accuracy based on group-tested results with differential misclassification.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Aiyi Liu; Qizhai Li; Paul S Albert
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 1.701

9.  Incorporating retesting outcomes for estimation of disease prevalence.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Aiyi Liu; Qizhai Li; Paul S Albert
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2019-11-23       Impact factor: 2.497

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.