Literature DB >> 23400596

Response classification based on a minimal model of glioblastoma growth is prognostic for clinical outcomes and distinguishes progression from pseudoprogression.

Maxwell Lewis Neal1, Andrew D Trister, Sunyoung Ahn, Anne Baldock, Carly A Bridge, Laura Guyman, Jordan Lange, Rita Sodt, Tyler Cloke, Albert Lai, Timothy F Cloughesy, Maciej M Mrugala, Jason K Rockhill, Russell C Rockne, Kristin R Swanson.   

Abstract

Glioblastoma multiforme is the most aggressive type of primary brain tumor. Glioblastoma growth dynamics vary widely across patients, making it difficult to accurately gauge their response to treatment. We developed a model-based metric of therapy response called Days Gained that accounts for this heterogeneity. Here, we show in 63 newly diagnosed patients with glioblastoma that Days Gained scores from a simple glioblastoma growth model computed at the time of the first postradiotherapy MRI scan are prognostic for time to tumor recurrence and overall patient survival. After radiation treatment, Days Gained also distinguished patients with pseudoprogression from those with true progression. Because Days Gained scores can be easily computed with routinely available clinical imaging devices, this model offers immediate potential to be used in ongoing prospective studies. ©2013 AACR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23400596      PMCID: PMC3740772          DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-3588

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  25 in total

Review 1.  The evolution of mathematical modeling of glioma proliferation and invasion.

Authors:  Hana L P Harpold; Ellsworth C Alvord; Kristin R Swanson
Journal:  J Neuropathol Exp Neurol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.685

2.  Response criteria for phase II studies of supratentorial malignant glioma.

Authors:  D R Macdonald; T L Cascino; S C Schold; J G Cairncross
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  The robustness of the "binormal" assumptions used in fitting ROC curves.

Authors:  J A Hanley
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1988 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.583

4.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis.

Authors:  Caroline A Schneider; Wayne S Rasband; Kevin W Eliceiri
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 28.547

6.  Continuous growth of mean tumor diameter in a subset of grade II gliomas.

Authors:  Emmanuel Mandonnet; Jean-Yves Delattre; Marie-Laure Tanguy; Kristin R Swanson; Antoine F Carpentier; Hugues Duffau; Philippe Cornu; Rémy Van Effenterre; Ellsworth C Alvord; Laurent Capelle
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 10.422

Review 7.  OsiriX: an open-source software for navigating in multidimensional DICOM images.

Authors:  Antoine Rosset; Luca Spadola; Osman Ratib
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2004-06-29       Impact factor: 4.056

8.  A quantitative model for differential motility of gliomas in grey and white matter.

Authors:  K R Swanson; E C Alvord; J D Murray
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 6.831

9.  Incidence of early pseudo-progression in a cohort of malignant glioma patients treated with chemoirradiation with temozolomide.

Authors:  Walter Taal; Dieta Brandsma; Hein G de Bruin; Jacoline E Bromberg; Annemarie T Swaak-Kragten; Peter A E Sillevis Smitt; Corine A van Es; Martin J van den Bent
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Velocity of radial expansion of contrast-enhancing gliomas and the effectiveness of radiotherapy in individual patients: a proof of principle.

Authors:  K R Swanson; H L P Harpold; D L Peacock; R Rockne; C Pennington; L Kilbride; R Grant; J M Wardlaw; E C Alvord
Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 4.126

View more
  24 in total

Review 1.  Clinical implications of in silico mathematical modeling for glioblastoma: a critical review.

Authors:  Maria Protopapa; Anna Zygogianni; Georgios S Stamatakos; Christos Antypas; Christina Armpilia; Nikolaos K Uzunoglu; Vassilis Kouloulias
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2017-10-28       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  Pseudo progression identification of glioblastoma with dictionary learning.

Authors:  Jian Zhang; Hengyong Yu; Xiaohua Qian; Keqin Liu; Hua Tan; Tielin Yang; Maode Wang; King Chuen Li; Michael D Chan; Waldemar Debinski; Anna Paulsson; Ge Wang; Xiaobo Zhou
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 4.589

3.  Distinct Phenotypic Clusters of Glioblastoma Growth and Response Kinetics Predict Survival.

Authors:  Corbin A Rayfield; Fillan Grady; Gustavo De Leon; Russell Rockne; Eduardo Carrasco; Pamela Jackson; Mayur Vora; Sandra K Johnston; Andrea Hawkins-Daarud; Kamala R Clark-Swanson; Scott Whitmire; Mauricio E Gamez; Alyx Porter; Leland Hu; Luis Gonzalez-Cuyar; Bernard Bendok; Sujay Vora; Kristin R Swanson
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2018-12

Review 4.  The biology and mathematical modelling of glioma invasion: a review.

Authors:  J C L Alfonso; K Talkenberger; M Seifert; B Klink; A Hawkins-Daarud; K R Swanson; H Hatzikirou; A Deutsch
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 5.  The mathematics of cancer: integrating quantitative models.

Authors:  Philipp M Altrock; Lin L Liu; Franziska Michor
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 60.716

6.  Gene therapy enhances chemotherapy tolerance and efficacy in glioblastoma patients.

Authors:  Jennifer E Adair; Sandra K Johnston; Maciej M Mrugala; Brian C Beard; Laura A Guyman; Anne L Baldock; Carly A Bridge; Andrea Hawkins-Daarud; Jennifer L Gori; Donald E Born; Luis F Gonzalez-Cuyar; Daniel L Silbergeld; Russell C Rockne; Barry E Storer; Jason K Rockhill; Kristin R Swanson; Hans-Peter Kiem
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 14.808

7.  Tumor growth rate is an early indicator of antitumor drug activity in phase I clinical trials.

Authors:  Charles Ferté; Marianna Fernandez; Antoine Hollebecque; Serge Koscielny; Antonin Levy; Christophe Massard; Rastislav Balheda; Brian Bot; Carlos Gomez-Roca; Clarisse Dromain; Samy Ammari; Jean-Charles Soria
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 8.  Patient-specific mathematical neuro-oncology: using a simple proliferation and invasion tumor model to inform clinical practice.

Authors:  Pamela R Jackson; Joseph Juliano; Andrea Hawkins-Daarud; Russell C Rockne; Kristin R Swanson
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 1.758

9.  Evaluation of pseudoprogression in patients with glioblastoma.

Authors:  Michael Jonathan Kucharczyk; Sameer Parpia; Anthony Whitton; Jeffrey Noah Greenspoon
Journal:  Neurooncol Pract       Date:  2016-11-04

Review 10.  Current advances in mathematical modeling of anti-cancer drug penetration into tumor tissues.

Authors:  Munju Kim; Robert J Gillies; Katarzyna A Rejniak
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.