PURPOSE: Despite the intra- and intertumoral heterogeneity seen in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), there is little definitive data on the underlying cause of the differences in patient survivals. Serial imaging assessment of tumor growth allows quantification of tumor growth kinetics (TGK) measured in terms of changes in the velocity of radial expansion seen on imaging. Because a systematic study of this entire TGK phenotype-growth before treatment and during each treatment to recurrence -has never been coordinately studied in GBMs, we sought to identify whether patients cluster into discrete groups on the basis of their TGK. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From our multi-institutional database, we identified 48 patients who underwent maximally safe resection followed by radiotherapy with imaging follow-up through the time of recurrence. The patients were then clustered into two groups through a k-means algorithm taking as input only the TGK before and during treatment. RESULTS: There was a significant survival difference between the clusters ( P = .003). Paradoxically, patients among the long-lived cluster had significantly larger tumors at diagnosis ( P = .027) and faster growth before treatment ( P = .003) but demonstrated a better response to adjuvant chemotherapy ( P = .048). A predictive model was built to identify which cluster patients would likely fall into on the basis of information that would be available to clinicians immediately after radiotherapy (accuracy, 90.3%). CONCLUSION: Dichotomizing the heterogeneity of GBMs into two populations-one faster growing yet more responsive with increased survival and one slower growing yet less responsive with shorter survival-suggests that many patients who receive standard-of-care treatments may get better benefit from select alternative treatments.
PURPOSE: Despite the intra- and intertumoral heterogeneity seen in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), there is little definitive data on the underlying cause of the differences in patient survivals. Serial imaging assessment of tumor growth allows quantification of tumor growth kinetics (TGK) measured in terms of changes in the velocity of radial expansion seen on imaging. Because a systematic study of this entire TGK phenotype-growth before treatment and during each treatment to recurrence -has never been coordinately studied in GBMs, we sought to identify whether patients cluster into discrete groups on the basis of their TGK. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From our multi-institutional database, we identified 48 patients who underwent maximally safe resection followed by radiotherapy with imaging follow-up through the time of recurrence. The patients were then clustered into two groups through a k-means algorithm taking as input only the TGK before and during treatment. RESULTS: There was a significant survival difference between the clusters ( P = .003). Paradoxically, patients among the long-lived cluster had significantly larger tumors at diagnosis ( P = .027) and faster growth before treatment ( P = .003) but demonstrated a better response to adjuvant chemotherapy ( P = .048). A predictive model was built to identify which cluster patients would likely fall into on the basis of information that would be available to clinicians immediately after radiotherapy (accuracy, 90.3%). CONCLUSION: Dichotomizing the heterogeneity of GBMs into two populations-one faster growing yet more responsive with increased survival and one slower growing yet less responsive with shorter survival-suggests that many patients who receive standard-of-care treatments may get better benefit from select alternative treatments.
Authors: Roel G W Verhaak; Katherine A Hoadley; Elizabeth Purdom; Victoria Wang; Yuan Qi; Matthew D Wilkerson; C Ryan Miller; Li Ding; Todd Golub; Jill P Mesirov; Gabriele Alexe; Michael Lawrence; Michael O'Kelly; Pablo Tamayo; Barbara A Weir; Stacey Gabriel; Wendy Winckler; Supriya Gupta; Lakshmi Jakkula; Heidi S Feiler; J Graeme Hodgson; C David James; Jann N Sarkaria; Cameron Brennan; Ari Kahn; Paul T Spellman; Richard K Wilson; Terence P Speed; Joe W Gray; Matthew Meyerson; Gad Getz; Charles M Perou; D Neil Hayes Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2010-01-19 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Maxwell Lewis Neal; Andrew D Trister; Sunyoung Ahn; Anne Baldock; Carly A Bridge; Laura Guyman; Jordan Lange; Rita Sodt; Tyler Cloke; Albert Lai; Timothy F Cloughesy; Maciej M Mrugala; Jason K Rockhill; Russell C Rockne; Kristin R Swanson Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2013-02-11 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: K R Swanson; H L P Harpold; D L Peacock; R Rockne; C Pennington; L Kilbride; R Grant; J M Wardlaw; E C Alvord Journal: Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) Date: 2008-03-04 Impact factor: 4.126
Authors: Charles Ferté; Marianna Fernandez; Antoine Hollebecque; Serge Koscielny; Antonin Levy; Christophe Massard; Rastislav Balheda; Brian Bot; Carlos Gomez-Roca; Clarisse Dromain; Samy Ammari; Jean-Charles Soria Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2013-11-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Akash Kumar; Evan A Boyle; Mari Tokita; Andrei M Mikheev; Michelle C Sanger; Emily Girard; John R Silber; Luis F Gonzalez-Cuyar; Joseph B Hiatt; Andrew Adey; Choli Lee; Jacob O Kitzman; Donald E Born; Daniel L Silbergeld; James M Olson; Robert C Rostomily; Jay Shendure Journal: Genome Biol Date: 2014-12-03 Impact factor: 13.583
Authors: Anne L Baldock; Sunyoung Ahn; Russell Rockne; Sandra Johnston; Maxwell Neal; David Corwin; Kamala Clark-Swanson; Greg Sterin; Andrew D Trister; Hani Malone; Victoria Ebiana; Adam M Sonabend; Maciej Mrugala; Jason K Rockhill; Daniel L Silbergeld; Albert Lai; Timothy Cloughesy; Guy M McKhann; Jeffrey N Bruce; Robert C Rostomily; Peter Canoll; Kristin R Swanson Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-10-28 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Ji Hyun Lee; Ho Yun Lee; Myung-Ju Ahn; Keunchil Park; Jin Seok Ahn; Jong-Mu Sun; Kyung Soo Lee Journal: Cancer Imaging Date: 2016-03-16 Impact factor: 3.909
Authors: A L Baldock; R C Rockne; A D Boone; M L Neal; A Hawkins-Daarud; D M Corwin; C A Bridge; L A Guyman; A D Trister; M M Mrugala; J K Rockhill; K R Swanson Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2013-04-02 Impact factor: 6.244
Authors: Benjamin M Ellingson; Elizabeth R Gerstner; Andrew B Lassman; Caroline Chung; Howard Colman; Patricia E Cole; David Leung; Joshua E Allen; Manmeet S Ahluwalia; Jerrold Boxerman; Matthew Brown; Jonathan Goldin; Edjah Nduom; Islam Hassan; Mark R Gilbert; Ingo K Mellinghoff; Michael Weller; Susan Chang; David Arons; Clair Meehan; Wendy Selig; Kirk Tanner; W K Alfred Yung; Martin van den Bent; Patrick Y Wen; Timothy F Cloughesy Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2022-08-01 Impact factor: 13.029
Authors: Sara Ranjbar; Kyle W Singleton; Pamela R Jackson; Cassandra R Rickertsen; Scott A Whitmire; Kamala R Clark-Swanson; J Ross Mitchell; Kristin R Swanson; Leland S Hu Journal: J Digit Imaging Date: 2020-04 Impact factor: 4.056
Authors: Michael L Maitland; Julia Wilkerson; Sanja Karovic; Binsheng Zhao; Jessica Flynn; Mengxi Zhou; Patrick Hilden; Firas S Ahmed; Laurent Dercle; Chaya S Moskowitz; Ying Tang; Dana E Connors; Stacey J Adam; Gary Kelloff; Mithat Gonen; Tito Fojo; Lawrence H Schwartz; Geoffrey R Oxnard Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2020-09-28 Impact factor: 12.531