Wei Zhou1, Xiaowu Xu, Jaifei Yan, Yiping Mou. 1. Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The relationship between nutritional risk and postoperative recovery of patients with major laparoscopic abdominal surgery is still unclear. The present study was designed to assess the value of the nutritional risk screening in predicting the postoperative outcomes in this cohort of patients. METHODS: Data from a consecutive series of 75 patients undergoing various elective major laparoscopic abdominal operations was prospectively collected. Nutritional risk was defined by the Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS 2002) score and correlated to the incidence of postoperative complications and hospital stay. Multivariate regression identified factors associated with 30-day complications [odds ratio (95 % confidence interval)]. RESULTS: The overall incidence of nutritional risk was 34.7 %. There was a significantly higher infectious complication rate of 38.5 % in patients at nutritional risk, compared to 12.2 % in patients at no risk (p = 0.008). No significant difference of postoperative hospital stay and overall complications was found in patients at nutritional risk or not. Nutritional risk was identified as an independent predictor of postoperative infectious complications (odds ratio 4.87 [1.33-17.84]; p = 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: The present study reinforces the value of the NRS 2002 to identify patients at higher risk of infectious complications after major laparoscopic abdominal surgery. In the era of minimally invasive surgery, the problem of nutritional risk still deserves our attention and concern.
BACKGROUND: The relationship between nutritional risk and postoperative recovery of patients with major laparoscopic abdominal surgery is still unclear. The present study was designed to assess the value of the nutritional risk screening in predicting the postoperative outcomes in this cohort of patients. METHODS: Data from a consecutive series of 75 patients undergoing various elective major laparoscopic abdominal operations was prospectively collected. Nutritional risk was defined by the Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS 2002) score and correlated to the incidence of postoperative complications and hospital stay. Multivariate regression identified factors associated with 30-day complications [odds ratio (95 % confidence interval)]. RESULTS: The overall incidence of nutritional risk was 34.7 %. There was a significantly higher infectious complication rate of 38.5 % in patients at nutritional risk, compared to 12.2 % in patients at no risk (p = 0.008). No significant difference of postoperative hospital stay and overall complications was found in patients at nutritional risk or not. Nutritional risk was identified as an independent predictor of postoperative infectious complications (odds ratio 4.87 [1.33-17.84]; p = 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: The present study reinforces the value of the NRS 2002 to identify patients at higher risk of infectious complications after major laparoscopic abdominal surgery. In the era of minimally invasive surgery, the problem of nutritional risk still deserves our attention and concern.
Authors: F Bozzetti; C Gavazzi; R Miceli; N Rossi; L Mariani; L Cozzaglio; G Bonfanti; S Piacenza Journal: JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr Date: 2000 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 4.016
Authors: Raghunandan Venkat; Barish H Edil; Richard D Schulick; Anne O Lidor; Martin A Makary; Christopher L Wolfgang Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Marc Schiesser; Sven Müller; Philipp Kirchhoff; Stefan Breitenstein; Markus Schäfer; Pierre-Alain Clavien Journal: Clin Nutr Date: 2008-03-17 Impact factor: 7.324
Authors: Cheguevara Afaneh; Deborah Gerszberg; Eoin Slattery; David S Seres; John A Chabot; Michael D Kluger Journal: Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr Date: 2015-02 Impact factor: 7.293
Authors: Eli Skeie; Anne Mette Koch; Stig Harthug; Unni Fosse; Kari Sygnestveit; Roy Miodini Nilsen; Randi J Tangvik Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-05-15 Impact factor: 3.240