Literature DB >> 25713805

Pancreatic cancer surgery and nutrition management: a review of the current literature.

Cheguevara Afaneh1, Deborah Gerszberg1, Eoin Slattery1, David S Seres1, John A Chabot1, Michael D Kluger1.   

Abstract

Surgery remains the only curative treatment for pancreaticobiliary tumors. These patients typically present in a malnourished state. Various screening tools have been employed to help with preoperative risk stratification. Examples include the subjective global assessment (SGA), malnutrition universal screening tool (MUST), and nutritional risk index (NRI). Adequate studies have not been performed to determine if perioperative interventions, based on nutrition risk assessment, result in less morbidity and mortality. The routine use of gastric decompression with nasogastric sump tubes may be unnecessary following elective pancreatic resections. Instead, placement should be selective and employed on a case-by-case basis. A wide variety of feeding modalities are available, oral nutrition being the most effective. Artificial nutrition may be provided by temporary nasal tube (nasogastric, nasojejunal, or combined nasogastrojejunal tube) or surgically placed tube [gastrostomy (GT), jejunostomy (JT), gastrojejunostomy tubes (GJT)], and intravenously (parenteral nutrition, PN). The optimal tube for enteral feeding cannot be determined based on current data. Each is associated with a specific set of complications. Dual lumen tubes may be useful in the presence of delayed gastric emptying (DGE) as the stomach may be decompressed while feeds are delivered to the jejunum. However, all feeding tubes placed in the small intestine, except direct jejunostomies, commonly dislodge and retroflex into the stomach. Jejunostomies are associated with less frequent, but more serious complications. These include intestinal torsion and bowel necrosis. PN is associated with septic, metabolic, and access-related complications and should be the feeding strategy of last-resort. Enteral feeds are clearly preferred over parental nutrition. A sound understanding of perioperative nutrition may improve patient outcomes. Patients undergoing pancreatic cancer surgery should undergo multidisciplinary nutrition screening and intervention, and the surgical/oncological team should include nutrition professionals in managing these patients in the perioperative period.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complications; enteral feeding tubes; nutrition; pancreatic cancer surgery

Year:  2015        PMID: 25713805      PMCID: PMC4318958          DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2304-3881.2014.08.07

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr        ISSN: 2304-3881            Impact factor:   7.293


  84 in total

1.  Nutritional risk screening in surgery: valid, feasible, easy!

Authors:  Ana Isabel Almeida; Marta Correia; Maria Camilo; Paula Ravasco
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 7.324

2.  The effect of clinical pathways for bariatric surgery on perioperative quality of care.

Authors:  Ulrich Ronellenfitsch; Matthias Schwarzbach; Anne Kring; Peter Kienle; Stefan Post; Till Hasenberg
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  One thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies.

Authors:  John L Cameron; Taylor S Riall; JoAnn Coleman; Kenneth A Belcher
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Postoperative complications in gastrointestinal cancer patients: the joint role of the nutritional status and the nutritional support.

Authors:  Federico Bozzetti; Luca Gianotti; Mario Braga; Valerio Di Carlo; Luigi Mariani
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 7.324

5.  Artificial nutrition after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  L Gianotti; M Braga; O Gentilini; G Balzano; A Zerbi; V Di Carlo
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.327

6.  Evaluation of an inflammation-based prognostic score in patients with inoperable pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Paul Glen; Nigel B Jamieson; Donald C McMillan; Ross Carter; Clem W Imrie; Colin J McKay
Journal:  Pancreatology       Date:  2006-07-13       Impact factor: 3.996

7.  The abridged patient-generated subjective global assessment is a useful tool for early detection and characterization of cancer cachexia.

Authors:  Antonio L Vigano; Jonathan di Tomasso; Robert D Kilgour; Barbara Trutschnigg; Enriqueta Lucar; José A Morais; Manuel Borod
Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 4.910

8.  Malnutrition and pancreatic surgery: prevalence and outcomes.

Authors:  Marco La Torre; Vincenzo Ziparo; Giuseppe Nigri; Marco Cavallini; Genoveffa Balducci; Giovanni Ramacciato
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 3.454

9.  Enhanced recovery after surgery pathway in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Marco Braga; Nicolò Pecorelli; Riccardo Ariotti; Giovanni Capretti; Massimiliano Greco; Gianpaolo Balzano; Renato Castoldi; Luigi Beretta
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Assessing surgical quality: comparison of general and procedure-specific morbidity estimation models for the risk adjustment of pancreaticoduodenectomy outcomes.

Authors:  C Ansorge; P Lindström; L Strömmer; J Blomberg; L Lundell; A Andrén-Sandberg; M Del Chiaro; R Segersvärd
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.352

View more
  19 in total

1.  Detours on the Road to Recovery: What Factors Delay Readiness to Return to Intended Oncologic Therapy (RIOT) After Liver Resection for Malignancy?

Authors:  Heather A Lillemoe; Rebecca K Marcus; Bradford J Kim; Nisha Narula; Catherine H Davis; Thomas A Aloia
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Implementation and Evaluation of a Clinical Pathway for Pancreaticoduodenectomy Procedures: a Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Marion van der Kolk; Mark van den Boogaard; Femke Becking-Verhaar; Hettie Custers; Hans van der Hoeven; Peter Pickkers; Kees van Laarhoven
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Anthropometric Changes in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer Undergoing Preoperative Therapy and Pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Jordan M Cloyd; Graciela M Nogueras-González; Laura R Prakash; Maria Q B Petzel; Nathan H Parker; An T Ngo-Huang; David Fogelman; Jason W Denbo; Naveen Garg; Michael P Kim; Jeffrey E Lee; Ching-Wei D Tzeng; Jason B Fleming; Matthew H G Katz
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 4.  Does the Ileal Brake Contribute to Delayed Gastric Emptying After Pancreatoduodenectomy?

Authors:  Savio G Barreto; John A Windsor
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Results from a UK-wide survey: the nutritional assessment and management of pancreatic resection patients is highly variable.

Authors:  Thomas B Russell; Paula Murphy; Andrei Tanase; Gourab Sen; Somaiah Aroori
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 4.884

6.  A Study on the Dietary Intake and the Nutritional Status among the Pancreatic Cancer Surgical Patients.

Authors:  Jimin Kang; Joon Seong Park; Dong Sup Yoon; Woo Jeong Kim; Hae-Yun Chung; Song Mi Lee; Namsoo Chang
Journal:  Clin Nutr Res       Date:  2016-10-31

7.  WT1-associated protein is a novel prognostic factor in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Bing-Qi Li; Shuai Huang; Qian-Qian Shao; Jian Sun; Li Zhou; Lei You; Tai-Ping Zhang; Quan Liao; Jun-Chao Guo; Yu-Pei Zhao
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 2.967

8. 

Authors:  Adébayo Cossi Alassani; Adrien Montcho Hodonou; Albert Comlan Dovonou; Gaspard Dansou Gbessi; Séraphin Ahoui; Francis Moïse Dossou; Delphin Kouassi Mêhinto
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2018-01-09

Review 9.  Introduction and practical approach to exocrine pancreatic insufficiency for the practicing clinician.

Authors:  Mohamed O Othman; Diala Harb; Jodie A Barkin
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  Plasma inflammatory cytokines and survival of pancreatic cancer patients.

Authors:  A Babic; N Schnure; N P Neupane; M M Zaman; N Rifai; M W Welch; L K Brais; D A Rubinson; V Morales-Oyarvide; C Yuan; S Zhang; E M Poole; B M Wolpin; M H Kulke; D A Barbie; K Wong; C S Fuchs; K Ng
Journal:  Clin Transl Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 4.488

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.