Samir D Sharma1, Houchun H Hu, Krishna S Nayak. 1. Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA; Ming Hsieh Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To develop a T2*-compensated parallel imaging and compressed sensing framework for water-fat separation, and to demonstrate accelerated quantitative imaging of proton density fat fraction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The proposed method extends a previously developed framework for water-fat separation by additionally compensating for T2* decay. A two-stage estimation was formulated that first determines an approximation of the B0 field map and then jointly estimates and refines the R2* (=1/T2*) and B0 field maps, respectively. The method was tested using a set of water-fat phantoms as well as liver datasets that were acquired from seven asymptomatic adult volunteers. The fat fraction estimates were compared to those from a commonly used nonaccelerated water-fat imaging method and also to a sequential parallel imaging and water-fat imaging method. RESULTS: The proposed method properly compensated for T2* decay to yield accurate fat fraction estimates in the water-fat phantoms. Further, linear regression analysis from the liver datasets showed that the proposed method accurately estimated fat fraction at acceleration factors that were higher than those achievable by the sequential parallel imaging and water-fat imaging method. Accurate fat fraction estimates were demonstrated at acceleration factors up to 4×, although some image artifacts were observed. CONCLUSION: The proposed T2*-compensated parallel imaging and compressed sensing framework demonstrates the potential to further accelerate water-fat imaging while maintaining accurate estimates of proton density fat fraction.
PURPOSE: To develop a T2*-compensated parallel imaging and compressed sensing framework for water-fat separation, and to demonstrate accelerated quantitative imaging of proton density fat fraction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The proposed method extends a previously developed framework for water-fat separation by additionally compensating for T2* decay. A two-stage estimation was formulated that first determines an approximation of the B0 field map and then jointly estimates and refines the R2* (=1/T2*) and B0 field maps, respectively. The method was tested using a set of water-fat phantoms as well as liver datasets that were acquired from seven asymptomatic adult volunteers. The fat fraction estimates were compared to those from a commonly used nonaccelerated water-fat imaging method and also to a sequential parallel imaging and water-fat imaging method. RESULTS: The proposed method properly compensated for T2* decay to yield accurate fat fraction estimates in the water-fat phantoms. Further, linear regression analysis from the liver datasets showed that the proposed method accurately estimated fat fraction at acceleration factors that were higher than those achievable by the sequential parallel imaging and water-fat imaging method. Accurate fat fraction estimates were demonstrated at acceleration factors up to 4×, although some image artifacts were observed. CONCLUSION: The proposed T2*-compensated parallel imaging and compressed sensing framework demonstrates the potential to further accelerate water-fat imaging while maintaining accurate estimates of proton density fat fraction.
Authors: Mariya Doneva; Peter Börnert; Holger Eggers; Alfred Mertins; John Pauly; Michael Lustig Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2010-09-21 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Catherine D G Hines; Alex Frydrychowicz; Gavin Hamilton; Dana L Tudorascu; Karl K Vigen; Huanzhou Yu; Charles A McKenzie; Claude B Sirlin; Jean H Brittain; Scott B Reeder Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Sina Meisamy; Catherine D G Hines; Gavin Hamilton; Claude B Sirlin; Charles A McKenzie; Huanzhou Yu; Jean H Brittain; Scott B Reeder Journal: Radiology Date: 2011-01-19 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Huanzhou Yu; Ann Shimakawa; Charles A McKenzie; Ethan Brodsky; Jean H Brittain; Scott B Reeder Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2008-11 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Felix Lugauer; Dominik Nickel; Jens Wetzl; Berthold Kiefer; Joachim Hornegger; Andreas Maier Journal: MAGMA Date: 2016-11-07 Impact factor: 2.310
Authors: Li Feng; Thomas Benkert; Kai Tobias Block; Daniel K Sodickson; Ricardo Otazo; Hersh Chandarana Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2016-12-16 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Mikell Yuhasz; Michael J Hoch; Mari Hagiwara; Mary T Bruno; James S Babb; Esther Raithel; Christoph Forman; Abbas Anwar; J Thomas Roland; Timothy M Shepherd Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2018-12 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Eric G Stinson; Joshua D Trzasko; Norbert G Campeau; James F Glockner; John Huston; Phillip M Young; Stephen J Riederer Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2018-02-27 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Fabian K Lohöfer; Georgios A Kaissis; Christina Müller-Leisse; Daniela Franz; Christoph Katemann; Andreas Hock; Johannes M Peeters; Ernst J Rummeny; Dimitrios Karampinos; Rickmer F Braren Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-11-15 Impact factor: 3.240