PURPOSE: To determine the precision and accuracy of hepatic fat-fraction measured with a chemical shift-based MRI fat-water separation method, using single-voxel MR spectroscopy (MRS) as a reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 42 patients, two repeated measurements were made using a T(1) -independent, T 2*-corrected chemical shift-based fat-water separation method with multi-peak spectral modeling of fat, and T(2) -corrected single voxel MR spectroscopy. Precision was assessed through calculation of Bland-Altman plots and concordance correlation intervals. Accuracy was assessed through linear regression between MRI and MRS. Sensitivity and specificity of MRI fat-fractions for diagnosis of steatosis using MRS as a reference standard were also calculated. RESULTS: Statistical analysis demonstrated excellent precision of MRI and MRS fat-fractions, indicated by 95% confidence intervals (units of absolute percent) of [-2.66%,2.64%] for single MRI ROI measurements, [-0.81%,0.80%] for averaged MRI ROI, and [-2.70%,2.87%] for single-voxel MRS. Linear regression between MRI and MRS indicated that the MRI method is highly accurate. Sensitivity and specificity for detection of steatosis using averaged MRI ROI were 100% and 94%, respectively. The relationship between hepatic fat-fraction and body mass index was examined. CONCLUSION: Fat-fraction measured with T(1) -independent T 2*-corrected MRI and multi-peak spectral modeling of fat is a highly precise and accurate method of quantifying hepatic steatosis.
PURPOSE: To determine the precision and accuracy of hepatic fat-fraction measured with a chemical shift-based MRI fat-water separation method, using single-voxel MR spectroscopy (MRS) as a reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 42 patients, two repeated measurements were made using a T(1) -independent, T 2*-corrected chemical shift-based fat-water separation method with multi-peak spectral modeling of fat, and T(2) -corrected single voxel MR spectroscopy. Precision was assessed through calculation of Bland-Altman plots and concordance correlation intervals. Accuracy was assessed through linear regression between MRI and MRS. Sensitivity and specificity of MRI fat-fractions for diagnosis of steatosis using MRS as a reference standard were also calculated. RESULTS: Statistical analysis demonstrated excellent precision of MRI and MRSfat-fractions, indicated by 95% confidence intervals (units of absolute percent) of [-2.66%,2.64%] for single MRI ROI measurements, [-0.81%,0.80%] for averaged MRI ROI, and [-2.70%,2.87%] for single-voxel MRS. Linear regression between MRI and MRS indicated that the MRI method is highly accurate. Sensitivity and specificity for detection of steatosis using averaged MRI ROI were 100% and 94%, respectively. The relationship between hepatic fat-fraction and body mass index was examined. CONCLUSION:Fat-fraction measured with T(1) -independent T 2*-corrected MRI and multi-peak spectral modeling of fat is a highly precise and accurate method of quantifying hepatic steatosis.
Authors: Hero K Hussain; Thomas L Chenevert; Frank J Londy; Vikas Gulani; Scott D Swanson; Barbara J McKenna; Henry D Appelman; Saroja Adusumilli; Joel K Greenson; Hari S Conjeevaram Journal: Radiology Date: 2005-10-19 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Okka W Hamer; Diego A Aguirre; Giovanna Casola; Joel E Lavine; Matthias Woenckhaus; Claude B Sirlin Journal: Radiographics Date: 2006 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 5.333
Authors: Mark Bydder; Takeshi Yokoo; Gavin Hamilton; Michael S Middleton; Alyssa D Chavez; Jeffrey B Schwimmer; Joel E Lavine; Claude B Sirlin Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2008-02-21 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: Antonio Cuadrado; Aitor Orive; Covadonga García-Suárez; Agustín Domínguez; Jose Carlos Fernández-Escalante; Javier Crespo; Fernando Pons-Romero Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Scott B Reeder; Charles A McKenzie; Angel R Pineda; Huanzhou Yu; Ann Shimakawa; Anja C Brau; Brian A Hargreaves; Garry E Gold; Jean H Brittain Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Huanzhou Yu; Charles A McKenzie; Ann Shimakawa; Anthony T Vu; Anja C S Brau; Philip J Beatty; Angel R Pineda; Jean H Brittain; Scott B Reeder Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: An Tang; Justin Tan; Mark Sun; Gavin Hamilton; Mark Bydder; Tanya Wolfson; Anthony C Gamst; Michael Middleton; Elizabeth M Brunt; Rohit Loomba; Joel E Lavine; Jeffrey B Schwimmer; Claude B Sirlin Journal: Radiology Date: 2013-02-04 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Gavin Hamilton; Alexandra N Schlein; Michael S Middleton; Catherine A Hooker; Tanya Wolfson; Anthony C Gamst; Rohit Loomba; Claude B Sirlin Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2016-08-29 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Jennifer L Rehm; Peter M Wolfgram; Diego Hernando; Jens C Eickhoff; David B Allen; Scott B Reeder Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2015-04-28 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Ruiyang Zhao; Yuxin Zhang; Xiaoke Wang; Timothy J Colgan; Jennifer L Rehm; Scott B Reeder; Kevin M Johnson; Diego Hernando Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2020-04-03 Impact factor: 4.668