Literature DB >> 33893853

Comparison of compressed SENSE and SENSE for quantitative liver MRI in children and young adults.

Alexander C Boyarko1, Jonathan R Dillman2,3, Jean A Tkach2,3, Amol S Pednekar2,3, Andrew T Trout2,3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Compressed SENSE (C-SENSE) allows more rapid MRI acquisition through incoherent, pseudorandom k-space undersampling. The purpose of our study was to compare conventional sensitivity encoded imaging (SENSE) quantitative MR images to those obtained using C-SENSE for measurement of liver proton density fat fraction (PDFF), T2*, and stiffness. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Clinical liver MRI examinations that included SENSE and C-SENSE quantitative MRI sequences were retrospectively identified. Patient age, gender, liver PDFF (%), T2* (ms), and stiffness (kPa) were recorded. Spearman's rank-order correlation (r) was used to evaluate association between methods, and Bland-Altman analysis was used to determine the mean bias and 95% limits of agreement.
RESULTS: Clinical liver MRI examinations that included SENSE and C-SENSE quantitative MRI sequences were retrospectively identified. Patient age, gender, liver PDFF (%), T2* (ms), and stiffness (kPa) were recorded. Spearman's rank-order correlation (r) was used to evaluate association between methods, and Bland-Altman analysis was used to determine the mean bias and 95% limits of agreement. Thirty-six examinations met the inclusion criteria. Mean patient age was 15.7 ± 7.7 years; twelve exams (33%) were in female patients. Liver PDFF showed very strong positive correlation (r = 0.98) between sequences, with a mean bias of 0.28% (95% LOA: -0.85, 1.41%). T2* showed moderate positive correlation (r = 0.53), with a mean bias of - 3.0 ms (95% LOA: - 12.0, 6.0 ms). Stiffness showed very strong positive correlation (r = 0.97), with a mean bias of 0.13 kPa (95% LOA: - 0.37, 0.63 kPa) that increased with increasing liver stiffness.
CONCLUSION: There were strong positive correlations between SENSE and C-SENSE MRI measurements of liver PDFF and stiffness, with no to minimal bias. However, there was moderate correlation and greater negative mean bias between T2* measurements. Our results demonstrate the potential of compressed sensing to reliably measure PDFF and stiffness in the clinic.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Compressed sensing; Liver; Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE); Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); Proton density fat fraction (PDFF); T2*

Year:  2021        PMID: 33893853     DOI: 10.1007/s00261-021-03092-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)


  17 in total

1.  Sparse MRI: The application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging.

Authors:  Michael Lustig; David Donoho; John M Pauly
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 2.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the pediatric liver: imaging of steatosis, iron deposition, and fibrosis.

Authors:  Alexander J Towbin; Suraj D Serai; Daniel J Podberesky
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2013-08-09       Impact factor: 2.266

3.  MR elastography: high rate of technical success in pediatric and young adult patients.

Authors:  Madalsa Joshi; Jonathan R Dillman; Alexander J Towbin; Suraj D Serai; Andrew T Trout
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2017-04-03

4.  Comparison of navigator-gated and breath-held image acquisition techniques for multi-echo quantitative dixon imaging of the liver in children and young adults.

Authors:  Leah A Gilligan; Jonathan R Dillman; Jean A Tkach; Andrew T Trout
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2019-06

5.  Magnetic resonance imaging and liver histology as biomarkers of hepatic steatosis in children with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

Authors:  Jeffrey B Schwimmer; Michael S Middleton; Cynthia Behling; Kimberly P Newton; Hannah I Awai; Melissa N Paiz; Jessica Lam; Jonathan C Hooker; Gavin Hamilton; John Fontanesi; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 17.425

6.  Correlation between liver histology and novel magnetic resonance imaging in adult patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease - MRI accurately quantifies hepatic steatosis in NAFLD.

Authors:  Z Permutt; T-A Le; M R Peterson; E Seki; D A Brenner; C Sirlin; R Loomba
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 8.171

7.  Quantitative Liver MRI-Biopsy Correlation in Pediatric and Young Adult Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Can One Be Used to Predict the Other?

Authors:  Jonathan R Dillman; Andrew T Trout; Emma N Costello; Suraj D Serai; Kristin S Bramlage; Rohit Kohli; Stavra A Xanthakos
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Hepatic MR Elastography: Clinical Performance in a Series of 1377 Consecutive Examinations.

Authors:  Meng Yin; Kevin J Glaser; Jayant A Talwalkar; Jun Chen; Armando Manduca; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Accuracy of Liver Fat Quantification With Advanced CT, MRI, and Ultrasound Techniques: Prospective Comparison With MR Spectroscopy.

Authors:  Harald Kramer; Perry J Pickhardt; Mark A Kliewer; Diego Hernando; Guang-Hong Chen; James A Zagzebski; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 10.  Elastography in Chronic Liver Disease: Modalities, Techniques, Limitations, and Future Directions.

Authors:  Aparna Srinivasa Babu; Michael L Wells; Oleg M Teytelboym; Justin E Mackey; Frank H Miller; Benjamin M Yeh; Richard L Ehman; Sudhakar K Venkatesh
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 5.333

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Magnetic resonance elastography of the liver: everything you need to know to get started.

Authors:  Kay M Pepin; Christopher L Welle; Flavius F Guglielmo; Jonathan R Dillman; Sudhakar K Venkatesh
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-11-01
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.