Literature DB >> 23385106

Dynamic data during hypotensive episode improves mortality predictions among patients with sepsis and hypotension.

Louis Mayaud1, Peggy S Lai, Gari D Clifford, Lionel Tarassenko, Leo Anthony Celi, Djillali Annane.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine if a prediction rule for hospital mortality using dynamic variables in response to treatment of hypotension in patients with sepsis performs better than current models.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
SETTING: All ICUs at a tertiary care hospital. PATIENTS: Adult patients admitted to ICUs between 2001 and 2007 of whom 2,113 met inclusion criteria and had sufficient data.
INTERVENTIONS: None.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We developed a prediction algorithm for hospital mortality in patients with sepsis and hypotension requiring medical intervention using data from the Multiparameter Intelligent Monitoring in Intensive Care II. We extracted 189 candidate variables, including treatments, physiologic variables and laboratory values collected before, during, and after a hypotensive episode. Thirty predictors were identified using a genetic algorithm on a training set (n=1500) and validated with a logistic regression model on an independent validation set (n=613). The final prediction algorithm used included dynamic information and had good discrimination (area under the receiver operating curve=82.0%) and calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow C statistic=10.43, p=0.06). This model was compared with Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation IV using reclassification indices and was found to be superior with an Net Reclassification Improvement of 0.19 (p<0.001) and an Integrated Discrimination Improvement of 0.09 (p<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Hospital mortality predictions based on dynamic variables surrounding a hypotensive event is a new approach to predicting prognosis. A model using these variables has good discrimination and calibration and offers additional predictive prognostic information beyond established ones.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23385106      PMCID: PMC3609896          DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182772adb

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  39 in total

Review 1.  New strategies for clinical trials in patients with sepsis and septic shock.

Authors:  J Cohen; G Guyatt; G R Bernard; T Calandra; D Cook; D Elbourne; J Marshall; A Nunn; S Opal
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 7.598

2.  CT attenuation of paired HRCT scans obtained at full inspiratory/expiratory position: comparison with pulmonary function tests.

Authors:  Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Jochem Hast; Claus Peter Heussel; Jens Schlegel; Peter Mildenberger; Manfred Thelen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2002-06-14       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Genetic polymorphisms in sepsis and septic shock: role in prognosis and potential for therapy.

Authors:  Cheryl L Holmes; James A Russell; Keith R Walley
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 9.410

4.  Extensions of net reclassification improvement calculations to measure usefulness of new biomarkers.

Authors:  Michael J Pencina; Ralph B D'Agostino; Ewout W Steyerberg
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-11-05       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  A prospective study of the use of a dobutamine stress test to identify outcome in patients with sepsis, severe sepsis, or septic shock.

Authors:  A Rhodes; F J Lamb; I Malagon; P J Newman; R M Grounds; E D Bennett
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 7.598

6.  A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Clinician blood pressure documentation of stable intensive care patients: an intelligent archiving agent has a higher association with future hypotension.

Authors:  Caleb W Hug; Gari D Clifford; Andrew T Reisner
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  Evaluating the performance of an institution using an intensive care unit benchmark.

Authors:  Bekele Afessa; Mark T Keegan; Rolf D Hubmayr; James M Naessens; Ognjen Gajic; Kirsten Hall Long; Steve G Peters
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 7.616

9.  Assessing the calibration of mortality benchmarks in critical care: The Hosmer-Lemeshow test revisited.

Authors:  Andrew A Kramer; Jack E Zimmerman
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 7.598

10.  Effect of treatment with low doses of hydrocortisone and fludrocortisone on mortality in patients with septic shock.

Authors:  Djillali Annane; Véronique Sébille; Claire Charpentier; Pierre-Edouard Bollaert; Bruno François; Jean-Michel Korach; Gilles Capellier; Yves Cohen; Elie Azoulay; Gilles Troché; Philippe Chaumet-Riffaud; Philippe Chaumet-Riffaut; Eric Bellissant
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-08-21       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  24 in total

1.  Predictive modeling of risk factors and complications of cataract surgery.

Authors:  Gregory L Gaskin; Suzann Pershing; Tyler S Cole; Nigam H Shah
Journal:  Eur J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 2.597

2.  "Big data" in the intensive care unit. Closing the data loop.

Authors:  Leo Anthony Celi; Roger G Mark; David J Stone; Robert A Montgomery
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 21.405

Review 3.  Applying machine learning to continuously monitored physiological data.

Authors:  Barret Rush; Leo Anthony Celi; David J Stone
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2018-11-11       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  Predictive modeling of inpatient mortality in departments of internal medicine.

Authors:  Naama Schwartz; Ali Sakhnini; Naiel Bisharat
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2017-12-30       Impact factor: 3.397

5.  An Interpretable Machine Learning Model for Accurate Prediction of Sepsis in the ICU.

Authors:  Shamim Nemati; Andre Holder; Fereshteh Razmi; Matthew D Stanley; Gari D Clifford; Timothy G Buchman
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 6.  Optimal data systems: the future of clinical predictions and decision support.

Authors:  Leo A Celi; Marie Csete; David Stone
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.687

7.  Assessing Contribution of Higher Order Clinical Risk Factors to Prediction of Outcome in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Patients.

Authors:  Azade Tabaie; Shamim Nemati; Jason W Allen; Charlotte Chung; Flavia Queiroga; Won-Jun Kuk; Adam B Prater
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2020-03-04

8.  Serial Daily Organ Failure Assessment Beyond ICU Day 5 Does Not Independently Add Precision to ICU Risk-of-Death Prediction.

Authors:  Andre L Holder; Elizabeth Overton; Peter Lyu; Jordan A Kempker; Shamim Nemati; Fereshteh Razmi; Greg S Martin; Timothy G Buchman; David J Murphy
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 7.598

9.  Making ICU prognostication patient centered: is there a role for dynamic information?

Authors:  William J Ehlenbach; Colin R Cooke
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 7.598

10.  A physiological time series dynamics-based approach to patient monitoring and outcome prediction.

Authors:  Li-wei H Lehman; Ryan P Adams; Louis Mayaud; George B Moody; Atul Malhotra; Roger G Mark; Shamim Nemati
Journal:  IEEE J Biomed Health Inform       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 5.772

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.