Literature DB >> 30417258

Applying machine learning to continuously monitored physiological data.

Barret Rush1, Leo Anthony Celi2,3, David J Stone4.   

Abstract

The use of machine learning (ML) in healthcare has enormous potential for improving disease detection, clinical decision support, and workflow efficiencies. In this commentary, we review published and potential applications for the use of ML for monitoring within the hospital environment. We present use cases as well as several questions regarding the application of ML to the analysis of the vast amount of complex data that clinicians must interpret in the realm of continuous physiological monitoring. ML, especially employed in bidirectional conjunction with electronic health record data, has the potential to extract much more useful information out of this currently under-analyzed data source from a population level. As a data driven entity, ML is dependent on copious, high quality input data so that error can be introduced by low quality data sources. At present, while ML is being studied in hybrid formulations along with static expert systems for monitoring applications, it is not yet actively incorporated in the formal artificial learning sense of an algorithm constantly learning and updating its rules without external intervention. Finally, innovations in monitoring, including those supported by ML, will pose regulatory and medico-legal challenges, as well as questions regarding precisely how to incorporate these features into clinical care and medical education. Rigorous evaluation of ML techniques compared to traditional methods or other AI methods will be required to validate the algorithms developed with consideration of database limitations and potential learning errors. Demonstration of value on processes and outcomes will be necessary to support the use of ML as a feature in monitoring system development: Future research is needed to evaluate all AI based programs before clinical implementation in non-research settings.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial intelligence; Intensive care; Machine learning; Monitoring; Patient monitoring; Physiological

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30417258      PMCID: PMC6511324          DOI: 10.1007/s10877-018-0219-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  29 in total

1.  Sensor fusion methods for reducing false alarms in heart rate monitoring.

Authors:  Gabriel Borges; Valner Brusamarello
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Preparing a New Generation of Clinicians for the Era of Big Data.

Authors:  Ari Moskowitz; Jakob McSparron; David J Stone; Leo Anthony Celi
Journal:  Harv Med Stud Rev       Date:  2015-01

3.  Real alerts and artifact classification in archived multi-signal vital sign monitoring data: implications for mining big data.

Authors:  Marilyn Hravnak; Lujie Chen; Artur Dubrawski; Eliezer Bose; Gilles Clermont; Michael R Pinsky
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  Prediction of severe sepsis using SVM model.

Authors:  Shu-Li Wang; Fan Wu; Bo-Hang Wang
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.622

5.  Dynamic data during hypotensive episode improves mortality predictions among patients with sepsis and hypotension.

Authors:  Louis Mayaud; Peggy S Lai; Gari D Clifford; Lionel Tarassenko; Leo Anthony Celi; Djillali Annane
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 6.  Critical care telemedicine: evolution and state of the art.

Authors:  Craig M Lilly; Marc T Zubrow; Kenneth M Kempner; H Neal Reynolds; Sanjay Subramanian; Evert A Eriksson; Crystal L Jenkins; Teresa A Rincon; Benjamin A Kohl; Robert H Groves; Elizabeth R Cowboy; Kamana E Mbekeani; Mark J McDonald; Dominick A Rascona; Michael H Ries; Herbert J Rogove; Ahmed E Badr; Isabelle C Kopec
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 7.598

7.  Using Supervised Machine Learning to Classify Real Alerts and Artifact in Online Multisignal Vital Sign Monitoring Data.

Authors:  Lujie Chen; Artur Dubrawski; Donghan Wang; Madalina Fiterau; Mathieu Guillame-Bert; Eliezer Bose; Ata M Kaynar; David J Wallace; Jane Guttendorf; Gilles Clermont; Michael R Pinsky; Marilyn Hravnak
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  Automatic Classification of Sedation Levels in ICU Patients Using Heart Rate Variability.

Authors:  Sunil B Nagaraj; Lauren M McClain; David W Zhou; Siddharth Biswal; Eric S Rosenthal; Patrick L Purdon; M Brandon Westover
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 7.598

9.  Effect of a multiple-site intensive care unit telemedicine program on clinical and economic outcomes: an alternative paradigm for intensivist staffing.

Authors:  Michael J Breslow; Brian A Rosenfeld; Martin Doerfler; Gene Burke; Gary Yates; David J Stone; Paige Tomaszewicz; Rod Hochman; David W Plocher
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 7.598

10.  Insights into the problem of alarm fatigue with physiologic monitor devices: a comprehensive observational study of consecutive intensive care unit patients.

Authors:  Barbara J Drew; Patricia Harris; Jessica K Zègre-Hemsey; Tina Mammone; Daniel Schindler; Rebeca Salas-Boni; Yong Bai; Adelita Tinoco; Quan Ding; Xiao Hu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Clinical and methodological challenges for assessing freezing of gait: Future perspectives.

Authors:  Martina Mancini; Bastiaan R Bloem; Fay B Horak; Simon J G Lewis; Alice Nieuwboer; Jorik Nonnekes
Journal:  Mov Disord       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 10.338

2.  Automated anesthesia artifact analysis: can machines be trained to take out the garbage?

Authors:  Allan F Simpao; Olivia Nelson; Luis M Ahumada
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2020-09-12       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  An awakening in medicine: the partnership of humanity and intelligent machines.

Authors:  Leo Anthony Celi; Benjamin Fine; David J Stone
Journal:  Lancet Digit Health       Date:  2019-09-26

4.  A novel artificial intelligence based intensive care unit monitoring system: using physiological waveforms to identify sepsis.

Authors:  Maximiliano Mollura; Li-Wei H Lehman; Roger G Mark; Riccardo Barbieri
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2021-10-25       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Early Detection of Sepsis With Machine Learning Techniques: A Brief Clinical Perspective.

Authors:  Daniele Roberto Giacobbe; Alessio Signori; Filippo Del Puente; Sara Mora; Luca Carmisciano; Federica Briano; Antonio Vena; Lorenzo Ball; Chiara Robba; Paolo Pelosi; Mauro Giacomini; Matteo Bassetti
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-02-12

6.  Hypotension Prediction Index with non-invasive continuous arterial pressure waveforms (ClearSight): clinical performance in Gynaecologic Oncologic Surgery.

Authors:  Luciano Frassanito; Pietro Paolo Giuri; Francesco Vassalli; Alessandra Piersanti; Alessia Longo; Bruno Antonio Zanfini; Stefano Catarci; Anna Fagotti; Giovanni Scambia; Gaetano Draisci
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 1.977

Review 7.  Current Status and Future Directions of Neuromonitoring With Emerging Technologies in Neonatal Care.

Authors:  Gabriel Fernando Todeschi Variane; João Paulo Vasques Camargo; Daniela Pereira Rodrigues; Maurício Magalhães; Marcelo Jenné Mimica
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 3.418

Review 8.  Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing end of year summary 2019: hemodynamic monitoring and management.

Authors:  Bernd Saugel; Lester A H Critchley; Thomas Kaufmann; Moritz Flick; Karim Kouz; Simon T Vistisen; Thomas W L Scheeren
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2020-03-14       Impact factor: 2.502

9.  Preprocessing surface EMG data removes voluntary muscle activity and enhances SPiQE fasciculation analysis.

Authors:  J Bashford; A Wickham; R Iniesta; E Drakakis; M Boutelle; K Mills; C E Shaw
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 10.  Artificial intelligence in telemetry: what clinicians should know.

Authors:  David M Maslove; Paul W G Elbers; Gilles Clermont
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 17.440

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.