Literature DB >> 28071815

Effect of glenohumeral elevation on subacromial supraspinatus compression risk during simulated reaching.

Rebekah L Lawrence1, Dustin M Schlangen1, Katelyn A Schneider1, Jonathan Schoenecker1, Andrea L Senger1, William C Starr1, Justin L Staker1, Jutta M Ellermann2, Jonathan P Braman3, Paula M Ludewig1.   

Abstract

Mechanical subacromial rotator cuff compression is one theoretical mechanism in the pathogenesis of rotator cuff disease. However, the relationship between shoulder kinematics and mechanical subacromial rotator cuff compression across the range of humeral elevation motion is not well understood. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of humeral elevation on subacromial compression risk of the supraspinatus during a simulated functional reaching task. Three-dimensional anatomical models were reconstructed from shoulder magnetic resonance images acquired from 20 subjects (10 asymptomatic, 10 symptomatic). Standardized glenohumeral kinematics from a simulated reaching task were imposed on the anatomic models and analyzed at 0, 30, 60, and 90° humerothoracic elevation. Five magnitudes of humeral retroversion were also imposed on the models at each angle of humerothoracic elevation to investigate the impact of retroversion on subacromial proximities. The minimum distance between the coracoacromial arch and supraspinatus tendon and footprint were quantified. When contact occurred, the magnitude of the intersecting volume between the supraspinatus tendon and coracoacromial arch was also quantified. The smallest minimum distance from the coracoacromial arch to the supraspinatus footprint occurred between 30 and 90°, while the smallest minimum distance to the supraspinatus tendon occurred between 0 and 60°. The magnitude of humeral retroversion did not significantly affect minimum distance to the supraspinatus tendon except at 60 or 90° humerothoracic elevation. The results of this study provide support for mechanical rotator cuff compression as a potential mechanism for the development of rotator cuff disease.
© 2017 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 35:2329-2337, 2017. © 2017 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  kinematics; shoulder; subacromial impingement; supraspinatus

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28071815      PMCID: PMC5503805          DOI: 10.1002/jor.23515

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  36 in total

1.  Acromiohumeral distance in a seated position in persons with impingement syndrome.

Authors:  Luc J Hébert; Hélène Moffet; Marie Dufour; Christian Moisan
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 2.  The relationship of acromial architecture to rotator cuff disease.

Authors:  L U Bigliani; J B Ticker; E L Flatow; L J Soslowsky; V C Mow
Journal:  Clin Sports Med       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 2.182

3.  Impingement of the deep surface of the supraspinatus tendon on the posterosuperior glenoid rim: An arthroscopic study.

Authors:  G Walch; P Boileau; E Noel; S T Donell
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2009-02-19       Impact factor: 3.019

4.  Determination of a reference system for the three-dimensional study of the glenohumeral relationship.

Authors:  Tom R G M Verstraeten; Ellen Deschepper; Matthijs Jacxsens; Stig Walravens; Brecht De Coninck; Nicole Pouliart; Lieven F De Wilde
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Effects of scapular dyskinesis and scapular assistance test on subacromial space during static arm elevation.

Authors:  Amee L Seitz; Philip W McClure; Stephanie S Lynch; Jessica M Ketchum; Lori A Michener
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2011-03-27       Impact factor: 3.019

6.  Reliability and diagnostic accuracy of 5 physical examination tests and combination of tests for subacromial impingement.

Authors:  Lori A Michener; Matthew K Walsworth; William C Doukas; Kevin P Murphy
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.966

7.  In vivo assessment of scapulohumeral rhythm during unconstrained overhead reaching in asymptomatic subjects.

Authors:  Jonathan P Braman; Sean C Engel; Robert F Laprade; Paula M Ludewig
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 3.019

Review 8.  Anatomical and biomechanical mechanisms of subacromial impingement syndrome.

Authors:  Lori A Michener; Philip W McClure; Andrew R Karduna
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.063

9.  Clinical and ultrasonographic correlation between scapular dyskinesia and subacromial space measurement among junior elite tennis players.

Authors:  R T Silva; L G Hartmann; C F de Souza Laurino; J P Rocha Biló
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 13.800

10.  Magnetic resonance imaging of rotator cuff tears in shoulder impingement syndrome.

Authors:  Magdalena Freygant; Ewa Dziurzyńska-Białek; Wiesław Guz; Antoni Samojedny; Andrzej Gołofit; Agnieszka Kostkiewicz; Krzysztof Terpin
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2014-11-03
View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Shoulder kinematics impact subacromial proximities: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Rebekah L Lawrence; Jonathan P Braman; Paula M Ludewig
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  The Impact of Decreased Scapulothoracic Upward Rotation on Subacromial Proximities.

Authors:  Rebekah L Lawrence; Jonathan P Braman; Paula M Ludewig
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 4.751

3.  The effect of glenohumeral plane of elevation on supraspinatus subacromial proximity.

Authors:  Rebekah L Lawrence; William C Sessions; Megan C Jensen; Justin L Staker; Aya Eid; Ryan Breighner; Nathaniel E Helwig; Jonathan P Braman; Paula M Ludewig
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Is the angular onset of pain during arm elevation associated to functioning in individuals with rotator cuff related shoulder pain?

Authors:  Gustavo Ricci Noés; Melina Nevoeiro Haik; Henrique Pott-Junior; Rodrigo Py Gonçalves Barreto; Larissa Pechincha Ribeiro; Dayana Patricia Rosa; Paula Rezende Camargo
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 4.762

5.  Development of shoulder pain with job-related repetitive load: mechanisms of tendon pathology and anxiety.

Authors:  Federico Pozzi; Catarina O Sousa; Hillary A Plummer; Brittany Andrade; Daniel Awokuse; Naoko Kono; Wendy J Mack; Shawn C Roll; Lori A Michener
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2021-10-14       Impact factor: 3.507

6.  Differences in scapular motion and parascapular muscle activities among patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic rotator cuff tears, and healthy individuals.

Authors:  Hiroaki Ishikawa; Takayuki Muraki; Shuhei Morise; Nobuyuki Yamamoto; Eiji Itoi; Shin-Ichi Izumi
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-12-15

7.  Supraspinatus-to-Glenoid Contact Occurs During Standardized Overhead Reaching Motion.

Authors:  Gaura Saini; Rebekah L Lawrence; Justin L Staker; Jonathan P Braman; Paula M Ludewig
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-10-06

8.  Adapting a fatigue model for shoulder flexion fatigue: Enhancing recovery rate during intermittent rest intervals.

Authors:  John M Looft; Laura A Frey-Law
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 2.712

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.