Naoya Kozono1, Takamitsu Okada2, Naohide Takeuchi1, Satoshi Hamai1, Hidehiko Higaki3, Satoru Ikebe3, Takeshi Shimoto4, Go Miake1, Yoshitaka Nakanishi1, Yukihide Iwamoto1. 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka City, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan. 2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka City, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan. t-okada@ortho.med.kyushu-u.ac.jp. 3. Department of Biorobotics, Faculty of Engineering, Kyushu Sangyo University, 2-3-1, Matsukadai, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka City, Fukuoka, 813-8503, Japan. 4. Department of Information and System Engineering, Faculty of Information Engineering, Fukuoka Institute of Technology, 3-30-1 Wajiro-higashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka City, Fukuoka, 811-0295, Japan.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the kinematics of healthy shoulders during dynamic full axial rotation and scapular plane full abduction using three-dimensional (3D)-to-two-dimensional (2D) model-to-image registration techniques. METHODS: Dynamic glenohumeral kinematics during axial rotation and scapular plane abduction were analysed in 10 healthy participants. Continuous radiographic images of axial rotation and scapular plane abduction were taken using a flat panel radiographic detector. The participants received a computed tomography scan to generate virtual digitally reconstructed radiographs. The density-based digitally reconstructed radiographs were then compared with the serial radiographic images acquired using image correlations. These 3D-to-2D model-to-image registration techniques determined the 3D positions and orientations of the humerus and scapula during dynamic full axial rotation and scapular plane full abduction. RESULTS: The humeral head centre translated an average of 2.5 ± 3.1 mm posteriorly, and 1.4 ± 1.0 mm superiorly in the early phase, then an average of 2.0 ± 0.8 mm inferiorly in the late phase during external rotation motion. The glenohumeral external rotation angle had a significant effect on the anterior/posterior (A/P) and superior/inferior (S/I) translation of the humeral head centre (both p < 0.05). 33.6 ± 15.6° of glenohumeral external rotation occurred during scapular plane abduction. The humeral head centre translated an average of 0.6 ± 0.9 mm superiorly in the early phase, then 1.7 ± 2.6 mm inferiorly in the late phase, and translated an average of 0.4 ± 0.5 mm medially in the early phase, then 1.6 ± 1.0 mm laterally in the late phase during scapular plane abduction. The humeral abduction angle had a significant effect on the S/I and lateral/medial (L/M) translation of the humeral head centre (both p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study investigated 3D translations of the humerus relative to the scapula: during scapular plane full abduction, the humerus rotated 33.6° externally relative to the scapula, and during external rotation motion in the adducted position, the humeral head centre translated an average of 2.5 mm posteriorly. Kinematic data will provide important insights into evaluating the kinematics of pathological shoulders. For clinical relevance, quantitative assessment of dynamic healthy shoulder kinematics might be a physiological indicator for the assessment of pathological shoulders.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the kinematics of healthy shoulders during dynamic full axial rotation and scapular plane full abduction using three-dimensional (3D)-to-two-dimensional (2D) model-to-image registration techniques. METHODS: Dynamic glenohumeral kinematics during axial rotation and scapular plane abduction were analysed in 10 healthy participants. Continuous radiographic images of axial rotation and scapular plane abduction were taken using a flat panel radiographic detector. The participants received a computed tomography scan to generate virtual digitally reconstructed radiographs. The density-based digitally reconstructed radiographs were then compared with the serial radiographic images acquired using image correlations. These 3D-to-2D model-to-image registration techniques determined the 3D positions and orientations of the humerus and scapula during dynamic full axial rotation and scapular plane full abduction. RESULTS: The humeral head centre translated an average of 2.5 ± 3.1 mm posteriorly, and 1.4 ± 1.0 mm superiorly in the early phase, then an average of 2.0 ± 0.8 mm inferiorly in the late phase during external rotation motion. The glenohumeral external rotation angle had a significant effect on the anterior/posterior (A/P) and superior/inferior (S/I) translation of the humeral head centre (both p < 0.05). 33.6 ± 15.6° of glenohumeral external rotation occurred during scapular plane abduction. The humeral head centre translated an average of 0.6 ± 0.9 mm superiorly in the early phase, then 1.7 ± 2.6 mm inferiorly in the late phase, and translated an average of 0.4 ± 0.5 mm medially in the early phase, then 1.6 ± 1.0 mm laterally in the late phase during scapular plane abduction. The humeral abduction angle had a significant effect on the S/I and lateral/medial (L/M) translation of the humeral head centre (both p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study investigated 3D translations of the humerus relative to the scapula: during scapular plane full abduction, the humerus rotated 33.6° externally relative to the scapula, and during external rotation motion in the adducted position, the humeral head centre translated an average of 2.5 mm posteriorly. Kinematic data will provide important insights into evaluating the kinematics of pathological shoulders. For clinical relevance, quantitative assessment of dynamic healthy shoulder kinematics might be a physiological indicator for the assessment of pathological shoulders.
Authors: Matthijs Jacxsens; Alexander Van Tongel; Laurent B Willemot; Andreas M Mueller; Victor Valderrabano; Lieven De Wilde Journal: J Shoulder Elbow Surg Date: 2014-10-22 Impact factor: 3.019
Authors: Tom R G M Verstraeten; Ellen Deschepper; Matthijs Jacxsens; Stig Walravens; Brecht De Coninck; Nicole Pouliart; Lieven F De Wilde Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2013-01-31 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: Ruediger M O von Eisenhart-Rothe; Alwin Jäger; Karl-Hans Englmeier; Thomas J Vogl; Heiko Graichen Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2002 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Satoshi Hamai; Taka-aki Moro-oka; Nicholas J Dunbar; Hiromasa Miura; Yukihide Iwamoto; Scott A Banks Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2012-12-23 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Gerald A Ferrer; R Matthew Miller; Jason P Zlotnicki; Scott Tashman; James J Irrgang; Volker Musahl; Richard E Debski Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2017-09-01 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Meghan E Vidt; Anthony C Santago; Anthony P Marsh; Eric J Hegedus; Christopher J Tuohy; Gary G Poehling; Michael T Freehill; Michael E Miller; Katherine R Saul Journal: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) Date: 2018-10-04 Impact factor: 2.063