Literature DB >> 11517362

Glenoid size, inclination, and version: an anatomic study.

R S Churchill1, J J Brems, H Kotschi.   

Abstract

Three hundred forty-four human scapular bones (172 matched pairs) were measured for their glenoid height, width, inclination, and version. The sample consisted of 50 black men, 50 white men, 50 black women, and 22 white women, all of whom were aged 20 to 30 years at the time of death. The mean age of the study group was 25.6 years. No difference in glenoid size was noted between black and white patients. The overall glenoid version for the entire study group was 1.23 degrees of retroversion. The difference in glenoid version between black and white patients was statistically significant. The average glenoid version for black and white patients measured 0.20 degrees and 2.65 degrees of retroversion, respectively (P =.000014). Specifically, the glenoid version for black and white men measured 0.11 degrees and 2.87 degrees of retroversion, respectively (P =.00034). The glenoid version for black and white women measured 0.30 degrees and 2.16 degrees of retroversion, respectively (P =.034). No statistical difference in glenoid version was found between men and women of the same race. No difference was found between measuring the glenoid version based on the transverse axis of the scapula and measuring the glenoid version perpendicular to the glenohumeral joint. No statistical difference was found in the glenoid inclination based on race or sex. The relationships between glenoid size, inclination, and version are important to understand when a surgeon prepares to resurface the glenoid during total shoulder arthroplasty. The knowledge of these values, their variation, and racial differences should help reproduce a more anatomical result.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11517362     DOI: 10.1067/mse.2001.115269

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  77 in total

1.  About the variability of the shape of the glenoid cavity.

Authors:  L F De Wilde; B M Berghs; E Audenaert; G Sys; G O Van Maele; E Barbaix
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2003-09-19       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  3D morphometric analysis of 43 scapulae.

Authors:  Xavier Ohl; Fabien Billuart; Pierre-Yves Lagacé; Olivier Gagey; Nicola Hagemeister; Wafa Skalli
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  Reliability of a set of protractors for direct anatomical measurements around the glenoid and humeral head rims.

Authors:  Hippolite O Amadi; Quentin A Fogg; Ukadike C Ugbolue; Roger J H Emery; Anthony M J Bull
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  Computed tomography morphological analysis of the scapula and its implications in shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Catarina N Damas; Joana Silva; Márcia C Sá; João Torres
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2015-11-14

5.  A stochastic analysis of glenoid inclination angle and superior migration of the humeral head.

Authors:  Nicholas G Flieg; Christopher J Gatti; Lisa Case Doro; Joseph E Langenderfer; James E Carpenter; Richard E Hughes
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 2.063

6.  Normal glenoid rim anatomy and the reliability of shoulder instability measurements based on intrasite correlation.

Authors:  Hans-Christian Jeske; Martina Oberthaler; Michael Klingensmith; Christian Dallapozza; Vinzenz Smekal; Markus Wambacher; Franz Kralinger
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2009-03-28       Impact factor: 1.246

7.  Trends in the diagnosis of SLAP lesions in the US military.

Authors:  Brian R Waterman; Kenneth L Cameron; Mark Hsiao; Joseph R Langston; Nicholas J Clark; Brett D Owens
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Age-dependent variation of glenohumeral anatomy: a radiological study.

Authors:  Benjamin Bockmann; Sonja Soschynski; Philipp Lechler; Steffen Ruchholtz; Florian Debus; Tim Schwarting; Michael Frink
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Glenoid version and size: does gender, ethnicity, or body size play a role?

Authors:  Hristo Ivanov Piponov; David Savin; Neal Shah; Domenic Esposito; Brian Schwartz; Vincent Moretti; Benjamin Goldberg
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  An optimised method for quantifying glenoid orientation.

Authors:  Hippolite O Amadi; Sughran Banerjee; Ulrich N Hansen; Andrew L Wallace; Anthony M J Bull
Journal:  Int J Shoulder Surg       Date:  2008-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.