Literature DB >> 31965594

Thinking outside the glenohumeral box: Hierarchical shape variation of the periarticular anatomy of the scapula using statistical shape modeling.

Matthijs Jacxsens1,2,3, Shireen Y Elhabian4, Sarah E Brady5, Peter N Chalmers1, Andreas M Mueller2, Robert Z Tashjian1, Heath B Henninger1,4,5.   

Abstract

Variation in the shape of the glenoid and periarticular anatomy of the scapula has been associated with shoulder pathology. The goal of this study was to identify the modes of shape variation of periarticular scapular anatomy in relation to the glenoid in nonpathologic shoulders. Computed tomography scans of 31 cadaveric scapulae, verified to be free of pathology, were three-dimensionally reconstructed. Statistical shape modeling and principal component analysis identified the modes of shape variation across the population. Corresponding linear and angular measurements quantified the morphometric variance identified by the modes. Linear measures were normalized to the radius of the inferior glenoid to account for differences in the scaling of the bones. Five modes captured 89.7% of total shape variation of the glenoid and periarticular anatomy. Apart from size differences (mode 1: 33.0%), acromial anatomy accounted for the largest variation (mode 2: 32.0%). Further modes described variation in glenoid inclination (mode 3: 11.8%), coracoid orientation and size (mode 4: 9.0%), and variation in coracoacromial (CA) morphology (mode 5: 3.1%). The average scapula had a mean acromial tilt of 49 ± 7°, scapular spine angle of 61 ± 6°, the glenoid inclination of 84 ± 4°, coracoid deviation angle of 26 ± 4°, coracoid length of 3.7 ± 0.3 glenoid radii, and a CA base length of 5.6 ± 0.5 radii. In this study, the identified shape modes explain almost all of the variance in scapular anatomy. The acromion exhibited the highest variance of all periarticular anatomic structures of the scapula in relation to the glenoid, which may play a role in many shoulder pathologies.
© 2020 Orthopaedic Research Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bone morphology; glenoid; scapular anatomy; shoulder; statistical shape modeling

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31965594      PMCID: PMC7375008          DOI: 10.1002/jor.24589

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  49 in total

1.  An anatomic study of the coracoid process as it relates to bone transfer procedures.

Authors:  Christopher M Dolan; Sanaz Hariri; Nathan D Hart; Timothy R McAdams
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 3.019

2.  Inclination-dependent changes of the critical shoulder angle significantly influence superior glenohumeral joint stability.

Authors:  B K Moor; R Kuster; G Osterhoff; D Baumgartner; C M L Werner; M A Zumstein; S Bouaicha
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 2.063

3.  A larger critical shoulder angle requires more rotator cuff activity to preserve joint stability.

Authors:  Arnd F Viehöfer; Christian Gerber; Philippe Favre; Elias Bachmann; Jess G Snedeker
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 3.494

4.  Correlation between glenoid inclination and critical shoulder angle: a radiographic and computed tomography study.

Authors:  Matthew Daggett; Birgit Werner; Philipp Collin; Marc-Olivier Gauci; Jean Chaoui; Gilles Walch
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2015-09-06       Impact factor: 3.019

5.  The effect of the conjoined tendon of the short head of the biceps and coracobrachialis on shoulder stability and kinematics during in-vitro simulation.

Authors:  Joshua W Giles; Harm W Boons; Louis M Ferreira; James A Johnson; George S Athwal
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2011-03-05       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  The critical shoulder angle is associated with rotator cuff tears and shoulder osteoarthritis and is better assessed with radiographs over MRI.

Authors:  Ulrich J Spiegl; Marilee P Horan; Sean W Smith; Charles P Ho; Peter J Millett
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-03-29       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  The critical acromial point: the anatomic location of the lateral acromion in the critical shoulder angle.

Authors:  Michael R Karns; Matthijs Jacxsens; William J Uffmann; Dane C Todd; Heath B Henninger; Robert T Burks
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 3.019

8.  Developing criteria for establishing interrater reliability of specific items: applications to assessment of adaptive behavior.

Authors:  D V Cicchetti; S A Sparrow
Journal:  Am J Ment Defic       Date:  1981-09

9.  Virtual reconstruction of glenoid bone defects using a statistical shape model.

Authors:  Katrien Plessers; Peter Vanden Berghe; Christophe Van Dijck; Roel Wirix-Speetjens; Philippe Debeer; Ilse Jonkers; Jos Vander Sloten
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 3.019

10.  Relationship between the lateral acromion angle and rotator cuff disease.

Authors:  M P Banas; R J Miller; S Totterman
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  1995 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.019

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.