| Literature DB >> 23358158 |
A Versace1, A C Andreazza2, L T Young2, J C Fournier1, J R C Almeida1, R S Stiffler1, J C Lockovich1, H A Aslam1, M H Pollock1, H Park2, V L Nimgaonkar1, D J Kupfer1, M L Phillips3.
Abstract
Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) studies consistently reported abnormalities in fractional anisotropy (FA) and radial diffusivity (RD), measures of the integrity of white matter (WM), in bipolar disorder (BD), that may reflect underlying pathophysiologic processes. There is, however, a pressing need to identify peripheral measures that are related to these WM measures, to help identify easily obtainable peripheral biomarkers of BD. Given the high lipid content of axonal membranes and myelin sheaths, and that elevated serum levels of lipid peroxidation are reported in BD, these serum measures may be promising peripheral biomarkers of underlying WM abnormalities in BD. We used DTI and probabilistic tractography to compare FA and RD in ten prefrontal-centered WM tracts, 8 of which are consistently shown to have abnormal FA (and/or RD) in BD, and also examined serum lipid peroxidation (lipid hydroperoxides, LPH and 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal, 4-HNE), in 24 currently euthymic BD adults (BDE) and 19 age- and gender-matched healthy adults (CONT). There was a significant effect of group upon FA in these a priori WM tracts (BDE<CONT: F[1,41]=6.8; P=0.013) and RD (BDE>CONT: F[1,41]=10.3; P=0.003), and a significant between-group difference in LPH (BDE>CONT: t[40]=2.4; P=0.022), but not in 4-HNE. Multivariate multiple regression analyses revealed that LPH variance explained, respectively, 59 and 51% of the variance of FA and RD across all study participants. This is the first study to examine relationships between measures of WM integrity and peripheral measures of lipid peroxidation. Our findings suggest that serum LPH may be useful in the development of a clinically relevant, yet easily obtainable and inexpensive, peripheral biomarkers of BD.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23358158 PMCID: PMC3640681 DOI: 10.1038/mp.2012.188
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Psychiatry ISSN: 1359-4184 Impact factor: 15.992
Figure 13-D anatomical representation of reconstructed WM tracts and graphical representation of between group differences in FA, RD and LPH
Panel A. The posterior distribution of each WM tract is displayed in isosurface mode. The forceps minor and major are represented in red; the anterior thalamic radiation in yellow, the angular bundle of the cingulum in light green; the cingulate gyrus of the cingulum in emerald green; the cortico-spinal tract in purple; the inferior longitudinal fasciculus in orange; the arcuate bundle of the superior longitudinal fasciculus in aquamarine; the III bundle of the superior longitudinal fasciculus in gray and uncinate fasciculus in blue. All fibers were thresholded at 20% of their maximum. The background image depicts the FA image in color-code convention in one of our participants: voxels with a red color define left-to-rightly oriented fibers; voxels with a blue color define inferior-to- superiorly oriented fibers and voxels with a green color define anterior-to-posteriorly oriented fibers. The isosurface superimposed on the sagittal view of the colored FA image shows the characteristic anterior-posterior alignment of the cingulum (green voxels) and the origin of the forceps minor and major (red voxels in the genu and splenium of the corpus callosum).
Panel B. Error-Bars graphs depict the between group differences in central measures (top; FA in the left corner and RD in the right corner) across all WM tracts, and in peripheral measures (bottom; LPH in the left corner and 4-HNE in the right corner) in 24 BDE and 19 CONT.
Panel C. Scatter plot graphs represent the linear relationship between mean FA (left) and mean RD (right) and LPH across all study participants in the forceps minor
Demographic and clinical variables in 24 BDE and 19 CONT
| GROUP | N | MEAN | [SD] | Statistics | df | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BDE | 24 | 33.2 | [7.7] | t= −0.4 | 41 | 0.658 | |
| CONT | 19 | 34.0 | [4.4] | ||||
| BDE | 8/16 | c2= 0.874 | 1 | 0.35 | |||
| CONT | 9/10 | ||||||
| BDE | 24 | 112.7 | [9.6] | t= 0.2 | 41 | 0.84 | |
| CONT | 19 | 112.1 | [8.5] | ||||
| BDE | 24 | 6.4 | [1.1] | t= 0.0 | 41 | 0.991 | |
| CONT | 19 | 6.4 | [1.3] | ||||
| BDE | 24 | 8.2 | [5.9] | ||||
| CONT | 19 | 1.8 | [1.9] | ||||
| BDE | 24 | 2.3 | [2.3] | ||||
| CONT | 19 | 0.3 | [0.7] | ||||
| BDE | 17 | 39.9 | [9.0] | ||||
| CONT | 18 | 26.6 | [6.6] | ||||
| BDE | 24 | 19.4 | [6.2] | ||||
| BDE | 24 | 13.8 | [7.4] | ||||
| BDE | 24 | 4.0 | [1.4] | ||||
| BDE | 24 | 26.8 | [29.9] | ||||
| BDE | 12/ 12 | ||||||
| BDE | 10/ 14 | ||||||
| BDE | 6/ 18 | ||||||
| BDE | 21/ 3 | ||||||
missing information in 1 CONT and 7 BD euthymic.
| A. 2-way Repeated Measure ANOVA of effects of group ( | ||
|---|---|---|
| FACTORS$ | F [1,41] | Sig. |
| GROUP | ||
| GROUP * WM TRACT | 1.4 | 0.237 |
There was no effect of age (F[39]=1.7; p=0.203) or gender (F[39]=0.001; p=0.977) in the comparison of central FA between BDE and CONT, therefore these factors were not entered in the model.
Mauchly's test of non-sphericity was significant, as such Greenhouse-Geisser corrections were used, corrected degrees of freedom=(2, 68).
Equal variances not assumed (Levene's test)
There was no effect of age (F[39]=0.2; p=0.658) or gender (F[39]=0.4; p=0.555) in the comparison of peripheral markers between BDE and CONT, therefore these factors were not entered in the model
Mauchly's test of non-sphericity was significant, as such Greenhouse-Geisser corrections were used, corrected degrees of freedom=(2, 81).
Equal variances not assumed (Levene's test)
| A. 2-way Repeated Measure ANOVA of effects of group ( | ||
|---|---|---|
| FACTORS | F[1,39] | Sig. |
| 0.2 | 0.652 | |
There was no effect of age (F[38]=1.8; p=0.192) or gender (F[38]=1.4; p=0.250) in the comparison of peripheral markers between BDE and CONT, therefore these factors were not entered in the model
Given the different unit between LPH and 4-HNE, the three peripheral markers were centered on the mean (data range between −1 and +1) before being entered in the model.
Mauchly's test of non-sphericity was significant, as such Greenhouse-Geisser corrections were used, corrected degrees of freedom=(2, 68).
Equal variances not assumed (Levene's test)
Original (not centered on the mean) descriptives of peripheral markers are reported.
Relationships between WM measures and peripheral measures of lipid peroxidation across all study participants.
| 0.4 | |||||||||
| 0.5 | |||||||||
| .033 | .837 | 42 | −.028 | .859 | 42 | ||||
| .137 | .525 | 24 | −.160 | .454 | 24 | ||||
| .216 | .390 | 18 | −.139 | .581 | 18 | ||||
| −.295 | .161 | 24 | .284 | .179 | 24 | ||||
| −.445 | .064 | 18 | |||||||
| −.005 | .973 | 42 | −.008 | .961 | 42 | ||||
| .115 | .593 | 24 | −.162 | .450 | 24 | ||||
| .006 | .981 | 18 | −.056 | .826 | 18 | ||||
| −.121 | .574 | 24 | .109 | .612 | 24 | ||||
| −.265 | .090 | 42 | .285 | .067 | 42 | ||||
| −.129 | .548 | 24 | .089 | .679 | 24 | ||||
| −.310 | .211 | 18 | .375 | .125 | 18 | ||||
| −.185 | .242 | 42 | .166 | .293 | 42 | ||||
| −.305 | .147 | 24 | .266 | .210 | 24 | ||||
| .130 | .607 | 18 | −.019 | .942 | 18 | ||||
| −.150 | .342 | 42 | .175 | .268 | 42 | ||||
| .167 | .435 | 24 | −.114 | .595 | 24 | ||||
| 18 | |||||||||
| −.089 | .573 | 42 | .062 | .698 | 42 | ||||
| .167 | .434 | 24 | −.174 | .415 | 24 | ||||
| −.098 | .699 | 18 | .131 | .604 | 18 | ||||
| −.086 | .588 | 42 | .087 | .585 | 42 | ||||
| .144 | .502 | 24 | −.171 | .425 | 24 | ||||
| −.289 | .245 | 18 | .433 | .073 | 18 | ||||
| −.266 | .089 | 42 | .273 | .080 | 42 | ||||
| −.048 | .824 | 24 | .055 | .799 | 24 | ||||
| 18 | |||||||||
Significance level was set at p<0.005 (p<0.05/10), to control for the ten parallel tests for individual tracts. Trend-level significance was set between 0.05 and 0.005.
Given the overall non-normality of the data (Levene's test < 200), Spearman's coefficients were reported between LPH and FA (and RD) in BDE, CONT and across the whole sample.